Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Dissecting biomass dynamics in a large Amazonian forest plot

  • Renato Valencia (a1), Richard Condit (a2), Helene C. Muller-Landau (a3), Consuelo Hernandez (a1) and Hugo Navarrete (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract:

Above-ground biomass (AGB) is increasing in most of the Amazon forests. One hypothesis is that forests are responding to widespread and intense human intervention prior to the European conquest (>500 y ago). In this study we confront this hypothesis with changes in AGB over 6.3 y in a large western Amazonian forest plot (>150 000 shrubs and trees and 1100 species with dbh ≥ 10 mm in 25 ha). We examined AGB flux in different habitats and across diameter classes. The forest lost small stems (4.6%), gained large trees (2.6%), and gained biomass (0.7%). The change in AGB stock was due entirely to this upward shift in size leading to more canopy trees and fewer saplings after just 6 y. Across habitats, the biggest increment in biomass was in the secondary-forest patch (3.4% y−1) which we know was cleared about 27 y ago, whereas mature forest on ridges and valleys had small increases (0.10% and 0.09% y−1, respectively). In both censuses, AGB stocks were >50% higher on the ridge than in the valley while relative growth and mortality were higher in the valley. Mean wood specific gravity (WSG) decreased with increasing diameter class; WSG did not change much between censuses in mature forests and did not contribute to the change in AGB stocks. Our forest increased its standing biomass, but far less than the average reported for other Amazonian forests (i.e. 0.30 vs. 0.98 Mg ha−1 y−1). We find no evidence to support the notion that this forest is recovering from long-past human intervention. Instead of a long-term recovery, we believe the forest changed in response to natural fluctuations of the environment (e.g. changes in precipitation, higher CO2), windstorms or other more recent events. The significant differences in AGB stocks between valley and ridge suggest that the terra firme forests are a mosaic of natural habitats, and that this mosaic is in part responsible for the variation in biomass stocks detected in Amazonian terra firme forests.

Resumen: La biomasa aérea de la mayoría de los bosques amazónicos está incrementando. Una hipótesis es que los bosques están respondiendo a un disturbio humano intenso y ampliamente distribuido, anterior a la llegada de los conquistadores europeos (>500 años atrás). En este estudio se confronta esta hipótesis con los cambios en biomasa encontrados en 6.3 años en una parcela de gran escala de la Amazonia occidental (>150.000 arbustos y árboles con diámetro a la altura del pecho ≥10 mm y 1100 especies en 25 ha). Los resultados se examinan por categorías de diámetro y hábitat. En este período el bosque perdió tallos pequeños (4.6%), ganó árboles grandes (2.6%) y ganó biomasa (0.7%). La ganancia en biomasa fue debida enteramente al incremento de árboles de gran tamaño que significó más árboles de dosel y menos juveniles en apenas 6 años. Entre los hábitats, el mayor incremento en biomasa se encontró en un parche de bosque secundario de colina (3.4%/año), cuya edad es de 27 años, mientras el bosque maduro de las colinas y los valles incrementó escasamente (0.10% y 0.09%/año, respectivamente). Tanto al inicio como al final del estudio, el stock de biomasa fue >50% más grande en la colina que en el valle mientras que el crecimiento y la mortalidad relativa fueron mayores en el valle. La media de la gravedad específica de la madera (GEM) fue menor a mayor clase diamétrica; en el bosque maduro, el cambio en la GEM fue insignificante y no contribuyó al aumento en stocks de biomasa. El bosque incrementó la biomasa aérea pero mucho menos que el promedio reportado para otros bosques amazónicos (i.e. 0.30 vs. 0.98 Mg ha−1/año). No se encontró evidencia que apoye la noción de que el bosque se está recuperando de un disturbio de gran escala ocurrido en el pasado. En su lugar, se cree que el bosque cambió en respuesta a fluctuaciones naturales del ambiente (e.g. cambios en precipitación, mayor concentración de CO2), vendavales u otro tipo de eventos más recientes. La diferencia significativa en los stocks de biomasa encontrada entre el valle y la colina sugiere que la tierra firme es un mosaico de hábitats naturales y que este mosaico podría explicar en parte la variación encontrada en los stocks de biomasa de bosques amazónicos de tierra firme.

Copyright
Corresponding author
1Email: lrvalencia@puce.edu.ec
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. S. ALVES , J. V. SOARES , S. AMARAL , E. M. K. MELLO , S. A. S. ALMEIDA , DA FERNANDES , O. SILVA & A. SILVEIRA 1997. Biomass of primary and secondary vegetation in Rondônia, Western Brazilian Amazon. Global Change Biology 3:451461.

T. R. BAKER , O. L. PHILLIPS , Y. MALHI , S. ALMEIDA , L. ARROYO , A. DI FIORE , T. ERWIN , N. HIGUCHI , T. J. KILLEEN , S. G. LAURENCE , W. F. LAURENCE , S. LEWIS , A. MONTEAGUDO , D. A. NEILL , P. NÚÑEZ , N. C. A. PITMAN , J. N. M. SILVA & R. VÁSQUEZ 2004. Increasing biomass in Amazonian forest plots. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 359:353365.

M. BUSH & M. SILMAN 2007. Amazonian exploitation revisited: ecological asymmetry and the policy pendulum. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 5:457465.

J. CHAVE , C. ANDALO , S. BROWN , M. A. CAIRNS , J. Q. CHAMBERS , D. EAMUS , H. FÖLSTER , F. FROMARD , N. HIGUCHI , T. KIRA , J.-P. LESCURE , W. NELSON , H. OGAWA , H. PUIG , B. RIÉRA & T. YAMAKURA 2005. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:8799.

J. CHAVE , R. CONDIT , H. C. MÜLLER-LANDAU , S. C. THOMAS , P. S. ASHTON , S. BUNYAVEJCHEWIN , L. L. CO , H. S. DATTARAJA , S. J. DAVIES , S. ESUFALI , C. E. N. EWANGO , K. J. FEELEY , R. B. FOSTER , N. GUNATILLEKE , S. GUNATILLEKE , P. HALL , T. B. HART , C. HERNÁNDEZ , S. P. HUBBELL , A. ITOH , S. KIRATIPRAYOON , J. V. LAFRANKIE , DE LOO , S. LAO , J.-R. MAKANA , M. N. S. NOOR , A. RAHMAN KASSIM , C. SAMPER , R. SUKUMAR , H. S. SURESH , S. TAN , J. THOMPSON , M. D. C. TONGCO , R. VALENCIA , M. VALLEJO , G. VILLA , T. YAMAKURA , J. K. ZIMMERMAN & E. C. LOSOS 2008. Assessing evidence for a pervasive alteration in tropical tree communities. PLOS Biology 6:455462.

R. CONDIT , S. P. HUBBELL & R. FOSTER 1995. Mortality rates of 205 neotropical tree and shrub species and the impact of a severe drought. Ecological Monographs 65:419439.

E. FICHTLER , D. A. CLARK & M. WORBES 2003. Age and long-term growth of trees in an old-growth tropical rain forest based on analyses of tree rings and 14C. Biotropica 35:306317.

J. GRACE , J. LLOYD , J. McINTYRE , A. C. MIRANDA , P. MEIR , H. S. MIRANDA , C. NOBRE , J. MONCRIEFF , J. MASSHEDER , Y. MALHI , I. WRIGHT & J. GASH 1995. Carbon dioxide uptake by an undisturbed tropical rain forest in southwest Amazonia 1992 to 1993s. Science 270:778780.

M. J. HECKENBERGER , J. CHRISTIAN RUSSELL , J. R. TONEY & M. J. SCHMIDT 2007. The legacy of cultural landscapes in the Brazilian Amazon: implications for biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 362:197208.

R. F. HUGHES , J. KAUFFMAN & V. J. JARAMILLO 1999. Biomass, carbon, and nutrient dynamics of secondary forests in a humid tropical region of Mexico. Ecology 80:18921907.

R. JOHN , J. W. DALLING , K. E. HARMS , J. B. YAVITT , R. F. STALLARD , M. MIRABELLO , S. P. HUBBELL , R. VALENCIA , H. NAVARRETE , M. VALLEJO & R. B. FOSTER 2007. Soil nutrients influence spatial distributions of tropical species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:864869.

S. L. LEWIS , Y. R. MALHI & O. L. PHILLIPS 2004. Fingerprinting the impacts of global change on tropical forests. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 359:437462.

L. NEWSON 1996. The population of the Amazon basin in 1492: a view from the Ecuadorian headwaters. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 21:526.

O. L. PHILLIPS , Y. MALHI , N. HIGUCHI , W. F. LAURENCE , P. V. NUÑEZ , R. M. VASQUEZ , S. G. LAURENCE , L. V. FERREIRA , M. STERN , S. BROWN & J. GRACE 1998. Changes in the carbon balance of tropical forests: evidence from long-term plots. Science 282:439442.

A. C. ROOSEVELT , R. A. HOUSLEY , DA IMAZIO , M. SILVEIRA , S. MARANCA & R. JONHNSON 1991. Eight millennium pottery from prehistoric shell midden in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 254:16211624.

F. N. SCATENA , S. MOYA , C. ESTRADA & J. D. CHINEA 1996. The first five years in the reorganization of aboveground biomass and nutrient use following hurricane Hugo in the Bisley Experimental Watersheds, Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Biotropica 28:424440.

M. STEININGER 2000. Secondary forest structure and biomass following short and extended land-use in central and southern Amazonia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 16:689708.

H. TUOMISTO , A. D. POULSEN , K. RUOKOLAINEN , R. C. MORAN , C. QUINTANA , J. CELI & G. CAÑAS 2003. Linking floristic patterns with soil heterogeneity and satellite imagery in Ecuadorian Amazonia. Ecological Applications 13:352371.

R. VALENCIA , R. FOSTER , G. VILLA , R. CONDIT , C. J. SVENNING , C. HERNÁNDEZ , K. ROMOLEROUX , E. LOSOS , E. MAGAARD & H. BALSLEV 2004. Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: a large forest plot in eastern Ecuador. Journal of Ecology 92:214229.

S. J. WRIGHT 2005. Tropical forests in a changing environment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:553560.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Tropical Ecology
  • ISSN: 0266-4674
  • EISSN: 1469-7831
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-tropical-ecology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: