Skip to main content
×
Home

Resource use by the two-toed sloth (Choloepus hoffmanni) and the three-toed sloth (Bradypus variegatus) differs in a shade-grown agro-ecosystem

  • Jorge E. Mendoza (a1), M. Zachariah Peery (a1), Gustavo A. Gutiérrez (a2), Geovanny Herrera (a1) and Jonathan N. Pauli (a1)...
Abstract:
Abstract:

Although resource specialization occurs along a continuum, species are often defined as either specialists or generalists. In general, specialists are more prone to extinction than generalists and, thus, are often the first species to be lost when habitats are modified. The two-toed sloth (Choloepus hoffmanni) and the three-toed sloth (Bradypus variegatus) are arboreal herbivores distributed across the Neotropics. The two-toed sloth is considered a generalist while the three-toed sloth is more specialized. Both species inhabit shade-grown agro-ecosystems but, at least at one study site, only the two-toed sloth was viable. To quantify specialization in sloth species and explore how it influences population viability, we characterized the resource use for 68 adult and 12 subadult sloths across 3 y. The two-toed sloth used 14 tree species relatively uniformly across habitats, while the three-toed sloth largely depended on only two species of tree regardless of habitat type. Both species selected for patches of intact tropical forest, strongly avoided monocultures regardless of spatial scale and generally used cocoa similarly in proportion to availability. However, the sloth species differed in their use of cattle pastures, with the two-toed sloth selecting for pastures and the three-toed sloth avoiding them. Overall, the two-toed sloth exhibited greater plasticity in tree and habitat use, which is likely contributing to its enhanced resilience within this modified agro-ecosystem.

Copyright
Corresponding author
1Corresponding author. Email: jnpauli@wisc.edu
References
Hide All
BOYLES J. G. & STORM J. J. 2007. The perils of picky eating: dietary breadth is related to extinction risk in insectivorous bats. PLoS ONE 2:e672.
BROUAT C., CHEVALLIER H., MEUSNIER S., NOBLECOURT T. & RASPLUS J.-Y. 2004. Specialization and habitat: spatial and environmental effects on abundance and genetic diversity of forest generalist and specialist Carabus species. Molecular Ecology 13:18151826.
BROWN S. & LUGO A. E. 1990. Tropical secondary forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6:132.
CASSANO C. R., KIERULFF M. C. M. & CHIARELLO A. G. 2011. The cacao agroforests of the Brazilian Atlantic forest as habitat for the endangered maned sloth Bradypus torquatus. Mammalian Biology 76:243250.
CHACÓN M. & HARVEY C. A. 2006. Live fences and landscape connectivity in a neotropical agricultural landscape. Agroforestry Systems 68:1526.
CHIARELLO A. G. 2008. Sloth ecology: an overview of field studies. Pp. 269280 in Vizcaíno S. F. & Loughry W. J. (eds.). The biology of the Xenarthra. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.
CLAVEL J., JULLIARD R. & DEVICTOR V. 2010. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9:222228.
CLOUGH Y., DWI PUTRA D., PITOPANG R. & TJITROSOEDIRDJO S. 2011. Conservation value of cacao agroforestry systems for terrestrial herbaceous species in central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biotropica 43:755762.
DELABIE J. H., JAHYNY B., CARDOSO DO NASCIMENTO I., MARIANO C. S. F., LACAU S., CAMPIOLO S., PHILPOTT S. M. & LEPONCE M. 2007. Contribution of cocoa plantations to the conservation of native ants (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with a special emphasis on the Atlantic Forest fauna of southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:23592384.
DELSUC F., FRANÇOIS M. C., STANHOPE M. J. & DOUZERY E. J. P. 2001. The evolution of armadillos, anteaters and sloths depicted by nuclear and mitochondrial phylogenies: implications for the status of the enigmatic fossil Eurotamandua. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 268:16051615.
DUNN R. R., HARRIS N. C., COLWELL R. K., KOH L. P. & SODHI N. S. 2009. The sixth mass coextinction: are most endangered species parasites and mutualists? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 276:30373045.
FUTUYMA D. J. & MORENO G. 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 19:207234.
GAUDIN T. J. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships among sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Tardigrada): the craniodental evidence. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 140:255305.
GILMORE D. P., DA COSTA C. P. & DUARTE D. P. F. 2001. Sloth biology: an update on their physiological ecology, behavior and role as vectors of arthropods and arboviruses. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 34:925.
HAMMEL B. E., GRAYUM M. H., HERRERA C. & ZAMORA N. 2003. Manual de plantas de Costa Rica. Vol. I. Introducción. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 97: 1299.
HOLDRIDGE L. R. 1967. Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica. 206 pp.
JANZEN D. H. 1983. Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 823 pp.
JOHNSON D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:6571.
JULLIARD R., CLAVEL J., DEVICTOR V., JIGUET F. & COUVET D. 2006. Spatial segregation of specialists and generalists in bird communities. Ecology Letters 9:12371244.
LAURANCE W. F. 1991. Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in Australian tropical rain-forest mammals. Conservation Biology 5:7989.
MACARTHUR R. H. 1972. Geographical ecology. Harper & Row, New York. 269 pp.
MANLY B. F. J., MCDONALD L. L., THOMAS D. L., MCDONALD T. L. & ERICKSON W. P. 2002. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. (Second edition). Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht. 222 pp.
MILLSPAUGH J. J. & MARZLUFF J. M. 2001. Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego. 474 pp.
MONTGOMERY G. G. & SUNQUIST M. E. 1975. Impact of sloths on Neotropical forest energy flow and nutrient cycling. Pp. 6998 in Golley F. B. & Medina E. (eds.). Tropical ecological systems. Springer, Berlin.
MONTGOMERY G. G. & SUNQUIST M. E. 1978. Habitat selection and use by two-toed and three-toed sloths. Pp. 329359 in Montgomery G. G. (ed.). The ecology of arboreal folivores. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
MYERS N. 1991. Tropical deforestation: the last situation. BioScience 41:282.
PARDINI R., FARIA D., ACCACIO G. M., LAPS R. R., MARIANO-NETO E., PACIENCIA M. L. B., DIXO M. & BAUMGARTEN J. 2009. The challenge of maintaining Atlantic forest biodiversity: a multi-taxa conservation assessment of specialist and generalist species in an agro-forestry mosaic in southern Bahia. Biological Conservation 142:11781190.
PAULI J. N., MENDOZA J. E., STEFFAN S. A., CAREY C. C., WEIMER P. J. & PEERY M. Z. 2014. A syndrome of mutualism reinforces the lifestyle of a sloth. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281:20133006.
PEERY M. Z. & PAULI J. N. 2014. Shade-grown cacao supports a self-sustaining population of two-toed but not three-toed sloths. Journal of Applied Ecology 51:162170.
ROLIM S. & CHIARELLO A. 2004. Slow death of Atlantic forest trees in cocoa agroforestry in southeastern Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 13:26792694.
SADER S. A. & JOYCE A. T. 1988. Deforestation rates and trends in Costa Rica, 1940 to 1983. Biotropica 20:1119.
SCHROTH G., HARVEY C. A. & VINCENT G. 2004. Complex agroforests: their structure, diversity, and potential role in landscape conservation. Pp. 227260 in Schroth T., da Fonseca G. A. B., Harvey C. A., Gascon C., Vasconcelos H. L. & Izac A.-M. N. (eds.). Agroforestry and conservation of biodiversity in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, DC.
SOL D., TIMMERMANS S. & LEFEBVRE L. 2002. Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Animal Behaviour 63:495502.
SUNQUIST M. E. & MONTGOMERY G. G. 1973. Activity patterns and rates of movement of two-toed and three-toed sloths (Choloepus hoffmanni and Bradypus infuscatus). Journal of Mammalogy 54:946954.
VAUGHAN C., RAMIREZ O., HERRERA G. & GURIES R. 2007. Spatial ecology and conservation of two sloth species in a cacao landscape in Limón, Costa Rica. Biodiversity Conservation 16:22932310.
ZUCHOWSKI W. 2007. Tropical plants of Costa Rica: a guide to native and exotic flora. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 529 pp.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Tropical Ecology
  • ISSN: 0266-4674
  • EISSN: 1469-7831
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-tropical-ecology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 54
Total number of PDF views: 256 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 653 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.