Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 19
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ashton, Robert H. 2016. The Value of Expert Opinion in the Pricing of Bordeaux Wine Futures. Journal of Wine Economics, p. 1.

    Cardebat, Jean-Marie and Livat, Florine 2016. Wine experts’ rating: a matter of taste?. International Journal of Wine Business Research, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 43.

    Gergaud, Olivier Storchmann, Karl and Verardi, Vincenzo 2015. EXPERT OPINION AND PRODUCT QUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM NEW YORK CITY RESTAURANTS. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 53, Issue. 2, p. 812.

    Honoré-Chedozeau, Carole Ballester, Jordi Chatelet, Bertrand Lempereur, Valérie and Aurand, Jean-Marie 2015. Wine competition: from between-juries consistency to sensory perception of consumers. BIO Web of Conferences, Vol. 5, p. 03009.

    Hopfer, Helene Nelson, Jenny Ebeler, Susan and Heymann, Hildegarde 2015. Correlating Wine Quality Indicators to Chemical and Sensory Measurements. Molecules, Vol. 20, Issue. 5, p. 8453.

    Miller, Jon R. Stone, Robert W. and Stuen, Eric T. 2015. When is a wine a bargain? A comparison of popular and regression-based approaches. Journal of Wine Research, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 153.

    Cao, Jing 2014. Quantifying Randomness Versus Consensus in Wine Quality Ratings. Journal of Wine Economics, Vol. 9, Issue. 02, p. 202.

    Cardebat, Jean-Marie Figuet, Jean-Marc and Paroissien, Emmanuel 2014. Expert Opinion and Bordeaux Wine Prices: An Attempt to Correct Biases in Subjective Judgments. Journal of Wine Economics, Vol. 9, Issue. 03, p. 282.

    Fares, M'hand and Orozco, Luis 2014. Tournament Mechanism in Wine-Grape Contracts: Evidence from a French Wine Cooperative. Journal of Wine Economics, Vol. 9, Issue. 03, p. 320.

    Ginsburgh, V. and Weyers, Sheila 2014. Nominees, winners, and losers. Journal of Cultural Economics, Vol. 38, Issue. 4, p. 291.

    Hodgson, Robert and Cao, Jing 2014. Criteria for Accrediting Expert Wine Judges. Journal of Wine Economics, Vol. 9, Issue. 01, p. 62.

    Hopfer, Helene and Heymann, Hildegarde 2014. Judging wine quality: Do we need experts, consumers or trained panelists?. Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 32, p. 221.

    Ashton, Robert H. 2013. Is There Consensus Among Wine Quality Ratings of Prominent Critics? An Empirical Analysis of Red Bordeaux, 2004–2010. Journal of Wine Economics, Vol. 8, Issue. 02, p. 225.

    2013. Quantitative Sensory Analysis.

    Ashton, Robert H. 2012. Reliability and Consensus of Experienced Wine Judges: Expertise Within and Between?. Journal of Wine Economics, Vol. 7, Issue. 01, p. 70.

    Taber, George M. 2012. The Judgment of Princeton. Journal of Wine Economics, Vol. 7, Issue. 02, p. 143.

    Cross, Robin Plantinga, Andrew J. and Stavins, Robert N. 2011. The Value of Terroir: Hedonic Estimation of Vineyard Sale Prices. Journal of Wine Economics, Vol. 6, Issue. 01, p. 1.

    Storchmann, K. 2011. Wine Economics: Emergence, Developments, Topics. Agrekon, Vol. 50, Issue. 3, p. 1.

    Cao, Jing and Stokes, Lynne 2010. Evaluation of Wine Judge Performance through Three Characteristics: Bias, Discrimination, and Variation. Journal of Wine Economics, Vol. 5, Issue. 01, p. 132.


An Analysis of the Concordance Among 13 U.S. Wine Competitions*

  • Robert T. Hodgson (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 June 2012

An analysis of over 4000 wines entered in 13 U.S. wine competitions shows little concordance among the venues in awarding Gold medals. Of the 2,440 wines entered in more than three competitions, 47 percent received Gold medals, but 84 percent of these same wines also received no award in another competition. Thus, many wines that are viewed as extraordinarily good at some competitions are viewed as below average at others. An analysis of the number of Gold medals received in multiple competitions indicates that the probability of winning a Gold medal at one competition is stochastically independent of the probability of receiving a Gold at another competition, indicating that winning a Gold medal is greatly influenced by chance alone. (JEL Classification: D02, Q19)

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Gawel and P.W. Godden (2008). Evaluation of the consistency of wine quality assessments from expert wine tasters. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 14, 18.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Wine Economics
  • ISSN: 1931-4361
  • EISSN: 1931-437X
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-wine-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *