Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Do Good Things Come in Small Packages? Bottle Size Effects on Willingness to Pay for Pomegranate Wine and Grape Wine*

  • Andreas C. Drichoutis (a1), Stathis Klonaris (a2) and Georgia S. Papoutsi (a3)
Abstract

We evaluate the claim that bottle size formats signal quality changes by performing a controlled laboratory experiment in which we simultaneously auction two different sweet wines: a pomegranate wine and a grape wine. We vary the size of the bottle from 500 mL to 750 mL between participants, but we keep the amount of wine constant across the bottle sizes. We also explore the effect of expectations for the wines, blind tasting, and information about wine attributes on people's willingness to pay (WTP). For both wines, we find evidence consistent with diminishing marginal utility; for the pomegranate wine, we find a premium for the smaller bottle size, which is consistent with changes in the wine's perceived quality. We also find that information is adequate in offsetting the negative effect of the tasting treatment. (JEL Classifications: C23, C24, C91, D12, M31)

Copyright
Corresponding author
e-mail: adrihout@aua.gr (corresponding author)
Footnotes
Hide All
*

We would like to thank the Editor and an anonymous reviewer for valuable suggestions. We would also like to thank Angelos Lagoudakis, Varvara Kechagia, Markella Bakalarou, Giorgos Koutsaftakis, and Dafni Papapanagiotou for excellent research assistance. Data collection was financially supported by the municipality of Athens through the grant Innovation and Entrepreneurship – Valorization of Research by the Agricultural University of Athens (Reference no 464052).

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Allison, R.I., and Uhl, K.P. (1964). Influence of beer brand identification on taste perception. Journal of Marketing Research, 1(3), 3639.
Bagwell, K., and Riordan, M.H. (1991). High and declining prices signal product quality. American Economic Review, 81(1), 224239.
Banerji, A., and Gupta, N. (2014). Detection, identification, and estimation of loss aversion: Evidence from an auction experiment. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(1), 91133.
Bazoche, P., Deola, C., and Soler, L.-G. (2008). An experimental study of wine consumers’ willingness to pay for environmental characteristics. 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists, August 26–29, Ghent, Belgium.
Boudreaux, C.A., and Palmer, S.E. (2007). A charming little Cabernet: Effects of wine label design on purchase intent and brand personality. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 19(3), 170186.
Brunke, H., Thiemann, F., Mueller, R., and Albrechts, C. (2009). Odd prices for odd bottles at VDP auctions? Paper presented at Enometrics XVI Conference of the Vineyard Data Quantification Society, May 20–23, Namur, Belgium.
Charness, G., Gneezy, U., and Kuhn, M.A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 81(1), 18.
Combris, P., Bazoche, P., Giraud-Hraud, E., and Issanchou, S. (2009). Food choices: What do we learn from combining sensory and economic experiments? Food Quality and Preference, 20(8), 550557.
Corgnet, B., Hernán-González, R., Kujal;, P. and Porter, D. (2014). The effect of earned versus house money on price bubble formation in experimental asset markets. Review of Finance, 19(4), 14551488.
Corrigan, J.R., Drichoutis, A.C., Lusk, J.L., Nayga, J.R.M., and Rousu, M.C. (2012). Repeated rounds with price feedback in experimental auction valuation: An adversarial collaboration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94(1), 97115.
Deaton, A., and Cartwright, N. (2016). Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 22595.
de Mello, L., and Pires, R. (2009). Message on the bottle: Colours and shapes of wine labels. American Association of Wine Economics Working Paper No. 42.
Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10(2), 171178.
Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32(200), 675701.
Friedman, M. (1939). A correction: The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 34(205), 109.
Goldstein, R., Almenberg, J., Dreber, A., Emerson, J.W., Herschkowitsch, A., and Katz, J. (2008). Do more expensive wines taste better? Evidence from a large sample of blind tastings. Journal of Wine Economics 3, 19.
Granato, D., Katayama, F.C.U., and de Castro, I.A. (2011). Phenolic composition of South American red wines classified according to their antioxidant activity, retail price and sensory quality. Food Chemistry, 129(2), 366373.
Ho, D.E., Imai, K., King, G., and Stuart, E.A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15(3), 199236.
Jacquemet, N., Joule, R.-V., Luchini, S., and Shogren, J.F. (2009). Earned wealth, engaged bidders? Evidence from a second-price auction. Economics Letters, 105(1), 3638.
Johansson, L., Haglund, R., Berglund, L., Lea, P., and Risvik, E. (1999). Preference for tomatoes, affected by sensory attributes and information about growth conditions. Food Quality and Preference, 10(45), 289298.
Kruskal, W.H., and Wallis, W.A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583621.
Lecocq, S., Magnac, T., Pichery, M.-C., and Visser, M. (2005). The impact of information on wine auction prices: Results of an experiment. Annales d'E´conomie et de Statistique 77, 3757.
Lecocq, S., and Visser, M. (2006). What determines wine prices: Objective vs. sensory characteristics. Journal of Wine Economics, 1(1), 4256.
Lesschaeve, I. (2007). Sensory evaluation of wine and commercial realities: Review of current practices and perspectives. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 58(2), 252258.
Lusk, J.L., and Shogren, J.F. (2007). Experimental auctions, methods and applications in economic and marketing research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mathur, S., and Qiu, C. (2012). Single package size as a signal of quality: Theory and evidence. Working paper available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1799703.
Mood, A.M. (1954). On the asymptotic efficiency of certain nonparametric two-sample tests. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25(3), 514522.
Mutz, D.C., and Pemantle, R. (2015). Standards for experimental research: Encouraging a better understanding of experimental methods. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 192215.
Outreville, J.F. (2011). Does the bottle size matter? An investigation into differences between posted and market price. American Association of Wine Economics Working Paper No. 86.
Rao, A.R., and Monroe, K.B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 351357.
Rivard, D. (2009). The ultimate fruit winemaker's guide. Bacchus Enterprises Ltd.
Rosato, A., and Tymula, A.A. (2016). Loss aversion and competition in Vickrey auctions: Money ain't no good. University of Sydney, Economics Working Paper Series 2016-09.
Schneider, D. (July 20, 2007). Ripe time for fruit wine. San Francisco Chronicle. Available at http://www.sfgate.com/wine/article/RIPE-TIME-FOR-FRUIT-WINE-2551791.php. Accessed on March 4, 2017.
Shiv, B., Carmon, Z., and Ariely, D. (2005). Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 383393.
Shogren, J.F., Margolis, M., Koo;, C. and List, J.A. (2001). A random nth-price auction. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46(4), 409421.
Shreay, S., Chouinard, H.H., and McCluskey, J.J. (2016). Product differentiation by package size. Agribusiness, 32(1), 315.
Siegrist, M., and Cousin, M.-E. (2009). Expectations influence sensory experience in a wine tasting. Appetite, 52(3), 762765.
Stone, H., and Sidel, J.L. (2004). Sensory evaluation practices. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Thomas, A. (2000). Elements influencing wine purchasing: A New Zealand view. International Journal of Wine Marketing, 12(2), 4762.
Toussaint-Samat, M. (2009). A history of food. (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Vecchio, R. (2013). Determinants of willingness-to-pay for sustainable wine: Evidence from experimental auctions. Wine Economics and Policy, 2(2), 8592.
Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16(1), 837.
Wine America. (2012). Wine comes from … crabapples, pineapples and other adventures. Available at http://wineamerica.org/news/wine-comes-from. Accessed on March 4, 2017.
Yan, D., Sengupta, J., and Wyer, R.S. Jr. (2014). Package size and perceived quality: The intervening role of unit price perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 417.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Wine Economics
  • ISSN: 1931-4361
  • EISSN: 1931-437X
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-wine-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Drichoutis supplementary material
Drichoutis supplementary material

 PDF (3.0 MB)
3.0 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 75 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 273 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th May 2017 - 19th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.