Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:52:03.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant's Non-Voluntarist Conception of Political Obligations: Why Justice is Impossible in the State of Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Helga Varden
Helga Varden
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper, I present and defend Kant's non-voluntarist conception of political obligations. I argue that civil society is not primarily a prudential requirement for justice; it is not merely a necessary evil or a moral response to combat our corrupting nature or our tendency to act viciously, thoughtlessly or in a biased manner. Rather, civil society is constitutive of rightful relations among persons because only in civil society can we interact in ways reconcilable with each person's innate right to freedom. Civil society is the means through which we can rightfully interact even on the ideal assumption that no one ever succumbs to immoral temptation. Kant's account, therefore, provides ideal reasons to support the claim that voluntarism cannot be the liberal ideal of political obligations.

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , July 2008 , pp. 1 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Flikschuh, Katrin (2000) Kant and Modern Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregor, Mary J. (1963) Laws of Freedom (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2000) Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness (Cambridge:Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. (2006) Kant (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höffe, Otfried (1992) ‘Even a nation of devils needs the state’: The dilemma of natural justice. In Williams, H. L. (ed.) Essays on Kant's Political Philosophy, pp. 120–42 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried. (2006) Kan''s Cosmopolitan Theory of War and Peace (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried (1994) lmmanuel Kant. Translated by Marshall, Farrier (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Holtman, Sarah Williams (2002) Revolution, contradiction, and Kantian citizenship. In M., Timmons (ed.) Kant's Metaphysics of Morals, pp. 209–32 (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, lmmanuel (1983) On the Proverb: That May be True in Theory, But is of No Practical Use. Prussian Academy pagination: 8: 273–313. In Perpetual Peace and Other Essays, translated by T., Humphrey, 61–92 (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Kant, lmmanuel. (1996) Metaphysics of Morals. Prussian Academy pagination: 6: 203–491. Translated and edited by Mary, Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kant, lmmanuel(2001) Notes on the lectures of Mr. Kant on the metaphysics of morals. Prussian Academy pagination 27: 479–732. Notes taken by Johann Friedrich Vigilantius. In Heath, P. and Schneewind, J. B. (eds) Lectures on Ethics, pp. 249–452 (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kaufman, Alexander (1999) Welfare in the Kantian State (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kersting, Wolfgang (1992a) Kant's concept of the state. In Williams, H. L. (ed.) Essays on Kant's Political Philosophy, pp. 143–66 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Kersting, Wolfgang. (1992b) Politics, freedom, and order: Kant's political philosophy. In P., Guyer (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
LaVaque-Manty, Mika (2006) Kant's children. Social Theory and Practice, 32, 3 (July): 365–88.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1998) Two Treatises of Government (1690). Edited by Peter, Laslett (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Ludwig, Bernd (2002) Whence public right? In M., Timmons (ed.) Kant's Metaphysics of Morals, pp. 159–84 (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Murphy, Jeffrie G. (1994) Kant: The Philosophy of Right. ROSE edition (Macon, GA: Mercer University Press).Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora (2000) Bounds of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas (2002) Is Kant's Rechtslehre a ‘comprehensive liberalism’? In Timmons, M. (ed.) Kant's Metaphysics of Morals, pp. 133–58 (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1996) Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (1999) A Theory of Justice. Revised edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Patrick (1999) Will and Political Legitimacy. A Critical Exposition of Social Contract Theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Hegel (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur (2004) Authority and coercion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32: 2–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. (2006) Private right, private order and public justice: Kant and Rawls. Virginia Law Review, 92, 7: 1391–38.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John (2001) Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Varden, Helga (2007) A Kantian conception of rightful sexual relations: Sex, (gay) marriage and prostitution. Social Philosophy Today, 22 (“Science, Technology and Social Justice”): 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varden, Helga. (2008) Diversity and unity. An attempt at drawing a justifiable line. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie/Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (ARSP), 94, Heft 1: 1–25.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. (1992) Law as idea of reason. In Williams, H. L. (ed.) Essays on Kant's Political Philosophy, pp. 15–49 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth (2002) A Kantian justification of possession. In Kant's Metaphysics of Morals, edited by M., Timmons, pp. 89–109 (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, Howard (1983) Kant's Political Philosophy (New York: St. Martin's Press).Google Scholar
Williams, Howard (1994) Kant on the Social Contract. In D., Boucher and P., Kelly (eds) The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, pp. 132–47 (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Howard (2003) Kant's Critique of Hobbes (Cardiff: University of Wales Press).Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul (1998) The completion of Kant's moral theory. In J., Kneller and S., Axinn (eds) Autonomy and Community, pp. 39–61 (Albany: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1998) Kant's historical materialism. In J., Kneller and S., Axinn (eds) Autonomy and Community: Readings in Contemporary Kantian Social Philosophy, pp. 15–37 (New York: SUNY Press).Google Scholar