Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-b7xgt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-13T13:43:46.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Till Hoeppner, Urteil und Anschauung. Kants metaphysische Deduktion der Kategorien, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021. Pp. xvii + 410. ISBN 9783110556278 (hbk) $126.99

Review products

Till Hoeppner, Urteil und Anschauung. Kants metaphysische Deduktion der Kategorien, Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021. Pp. xvii + 410. ISBN 9783110556278 (hbk) $126.99

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2023

Dennis Schulting
Dennis Schulting*
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar
*
Email: ds196901@googlemail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 2023 , pp. 640 - 644
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brandt, Reinhard (1991) Die Urteilstafel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft A67–76;B92–101. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Conant, James (2016) ‘Why Kant Is Not a Kantian’. Philosophical Topics, 44(1), 75–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (1998) Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proops, Ian (2003) ‘Kant’s Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 41(2), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Klaus (1932) Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Berlin: R. Schoetz.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael (1995) Die Vollständigkeit der kantischen Urteilstafel. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar