Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T12:05:18.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acting Irrespective of Hope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2020

Fabian Freyenhagen
Fabian Freyenhagen*
Affiliation:
University of Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Must we ascribe hope for better times to those who (take themselves to) act morally? Kant and later theorists in the Frankfurt School tradition thought we must. In this article, I disclose that it is possible – and ethical – to refrain from ascribing hope in all such cases. I draw on two key examples of acting irrespective of hope: one from a recent political context and one from the life of Jean Améry. I also suggest that, once we see that it is possible to make sense of (what I call) ‘merely expressive acts’, we can also see that the early Frankfurt School was not guilty of a performative contradiction in seeking to enlighten Enlightenment about its (self-)destructive tendencies, while rejecting the (providential) idea of progress.

Keywords

AméryFrankfurt SchoolKanthopeprogressBernard Williams
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 25 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue on Kant and the Frankfurt School , December 2020 , pp. 605 - 630
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. (1966) Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Trans. Dennis Redmond (2001): https://www.academia.edu/39707967/Negative_Dialectics.Google Scholar
Allen, Amy (2016) The End of Progress. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/alle17324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Amy, Jaeggi, Rahel, and von Redecker, Eva (2018) ‘Progress, Normativity, and the Dynamics of Social Change: An Exchange between Rahel Jaeggi and Amy Allen (Conducted by Eva von Redecker)’. In Amy, Allen and Eduardo, Mendieta (eds), From Alienation to Forms of Life: The Critical Theory of Rahel Jaeggi (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press), 156–87.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1994) Eichmann in Jerusalem. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Améry, Jean (1980) At the Mind’s Limits. Bloomington, IN, and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter ([1940] 2005) ‘On the Concept of History’. Trans. Dennis Redmond: https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/benjamin/1940/history.htm Google Scholar
Celikates, Robin (2018) ‘Forms of Life, Progress, and Social Struggle: On Rahel Jaeggi’s Critical Theory’. In Amy, Allen and Eduardo, Mendieta (eds), From Alienation to Forms of Life: The Critical Theory of Rahel Jaeggi (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press), 137–55.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1982) ‘The Entwinement of Myth and Enlightenment: Re-Reading Dialectic of Enlightenment ’. New German Critique, 26, 13–30.10.2307/488023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel (2007) ‘The Irreducibility of Progress: Kant’s Account of the Relationship between Morality and History’. Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory, 8 (1), 1–17.10.1558/crit.v8i1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel (2014) Freedom’s Right. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/honn16246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horkheimer, Max (1987) Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, ‘Dialektik der Aufklärung’ und Schriften 1940–1950. Ed. Schmidt, Alfred and Schmid Noerr, Gunzelin. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, Rahel (2018a) ‘“Resistance to the Perpetual Danger of Relapse”: Moral Progress and Social Change’. In Amy, Allen and Eduardo, Mendieta (eds), From Alienation to Forms of Life: The Critical Theory of Rahel Jaeggi (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press), 15–40.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, Rahel (2018b) ‘Reply to my Critics’. In Amy, Allen and Eduardo, Mendieta (eds), From Alienation to Forms of Life: The Critical Theory of Rahel Jaeggi (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press), 188–235.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Primo ([1986] 2013) The Drowned and the Saved. Trans. Raymond Rosenthal. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas (2009) Race, Empire, and the Idea of Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511814044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John (2000) Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Ed. Herman, Barbara. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, Paul, and Herlinde, Pauer-Studer (2011) ‘Distortions of Normativity’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 14 (3), 329–56.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1981) Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1993) Shame and Necessity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig ([1931] 1979) Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough. Trans. A. C. Miles, ed and rev. Rush Rhees, Nottinghamshire: Brynmill.Google Scholar