Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 135
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Anders, Gerrit Seebach, Hella Steghöfer, Jan-Philipp Reif, Wolfgang André, Elisabeth Hähner, Jörg Müller-Schloer, Christian and Ungerer, Theo 2016. Trustworthy Open Self-Organising Systems.


    Anders, Gerrit Siefert, Florian Schiendorfer, Alexander Seebach, Hella Steghöfer, Jan-Philipp Eberhardinger, Benedikt Kosak, Oliver and Reif, Wolfgang 2016. Trustworthy Open Self-Organising Systems.


    Ansari, Javad Gholami, Amin and Kazemi, Ahad 2016. Multi-agent systems for reactive power control in smart grids. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 83, p. 411.


    Beigi, Akram and Mozayani, Nasser 2016. Dialogue strategy for horizontal communication in MAS organization. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 161.


    Bergenti, Federico Poggi, Agostino and Tomaiuolo, Michele 2016. Encyclopedia of E-Health and Telemedicine.


    Corkill, Daniel D. Garant, Daniel and Lesser, Victor R. 2016. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Normes in Agent Systems XI.


    Garcia, Emilia Giret, Adriana and Botti, Vicente 2016. Designing normative open virtual enterprises. Enterprise Information Systems, Vol. 10, Issue. 3, p. 303.


    Gliwa, Bogdan Koźlak, Jarosław Zygmunt, Anna and Demazeau, Yves 2016. Advances in Practical Applications of Scalable Multi-agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection.


    HolmesParker, Chris Agogino, Adrian K. and Tumer, Kagan 2016. Combining reward shaping and hierarchies for scaling to large multiagent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 31, Issue. 01, p. 3.


    Kantert, Jan Edenhofer, Sarah Tomforde, Sven Hähner, Jörg and Müller-Schloer, Christian 2016. Trustworthy Open Self-Organising Systems.


    Liang, Xin Shen, Geoffrey Qiping and Bu, Shanshan 2016. Multiagent Systems in Construction: A Ten-Year Review. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, p. 04016016.


    Schatten, Markus Ševa, Jurica and Tomičić, Igor 2016. A roadmap for scalable agent organizations in the Internet of Everything. Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 115, p. 31.


    von Mammen, Sebastian Schellmoser, Stefan Jacob, Christian and Hähner, Jörg 2016. The Digital Patient.


    Widmer, Tobias Premm, Marc and Kirn, Stefan 2016. Business Information Systems.


    Wu, Guohua Pedrycz, Witold Li, Haifeng Ma, Manhao and Liu, Jin 2016. Coordinated Planning of Heterogeneous Earth Observation Resources. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, Vol. 46, Issue. 1, p. 109.


    Alqithami, Saad 2015. 2015 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS). p. 464.

    Alqithami, Saad and Hexmoor, Henry 2015. 2015 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS). p. 98.

    Banerjee, Chayan and Deepthi, Navya 2015. 2015 International Conference on Robotics, Automation, Control and Embedded Systems (RACE). p. 1.

    Basiry, Imane and Ghasem-Aghaee, Nasser 2015. 2015 2nd International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation (KBEI). p. 872.

    De La Torre, Gerardo and Yucelen, Tansel 2015. 2015 American Control Conference (ACC). p. 3410.

    ×

A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms

  • BRYAN HORLING (a1) and VICTOR LESSER (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269888905000317
  • Published online: 01 December 2004
Abstract

Many researchers have demonstrated that the organizational design employed by an agent system can have a significant, quantitative effect on its performance characteristics. A range of organizational strategies have emerged from this line of research, each with different strengths and weaknesses. In this article we present a survey of the major organizational paradigms used in multi-agent systems. These include hierarchies, holarchies, coalitions, teams, congregations, societies, federations, markets, and matrix organizations. We will provide a description of each, discuss their advantages and disadvantages, and provide examples of how they may be instantiated and maintained. This summary will facilitate the comparative evaluation of organizational styles, allowing designers to first recognize the spectrum of possibilities, and then guiding the selection of an appropriate organizational design for a particular domain and environment.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Knowledge Engineering Review
  • ISSN: 0269-8889
  • EISSN: 1469-8005
  • URL: /core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×