Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police1

  • Marilyn R. Whalen (a1) and Don H. Zimmerman (a2)

Abstract

In this article, we examine the way citizens' descriptions of troublesome occurrences in reports to emergency dispatch personnel are vulnerable to suspicion and doubt. The vulnerability of description in these cases involves callers' categorization of, visual or aural access to, and involvement in the reported “trouble.” It is through displays of what we term practical epistemology – displays of how one has come to know about a particular event – that these vulnerabilites emerge and are tested and negotiated in the request for and dispatch of emergency assistance. (Conversation analysis, language in institutional settings, pragmatics)

Copyright

References

Hide All
Atkinson, J. M. (1982). Understanding formality: Notes on the categorization and production of “formal” interaction. British Journal of Sociology 33:86117.
Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organization of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.
Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (eds.) (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boden, D., & Zimmerman, D. H. (eds.) (in press). Talk and social structure. Cambridge: Polity.
Button, G., & Lee, J. (eds.) (1987). Talk and social organization. Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Cicourel, A. V. (1987). The interpenetration of communicative contexts: Examples from medical encounters. Social Psychology Quarterly 50:217–26.
Clayman, S. (1987). Generating news: The interactional organization of news interviews. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (eds.) (in press). Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frankel, R. M. (1989). “I wuz wondering - uhm, could Raid effect the brain permanently d'y'know?”: Some observations on the interaction of speaking and writing in calls to a poison control center. Western Journal of Speech Communication 53:195226.
Greatbatch, D. (1988). A turn taking System for British new interviews. Language in Society 17:401–30.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
Heritage, J. (1985a). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis. New York: Academic. 95117.
Heritage, J. (1985b). Recent developments in conversation analysis. Sociolinguistics Newsletter 15:118.
Heritage, J. (1988). Current developments in conversation analysis. In D. Roger & P. Bull (eds.), Conversation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 2147.
Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (in press). On the institutional character of institutional talk. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (eds.).
Le Carré, J. ([1962] 1979). Call for the dead. New York: Bantam.
Levinson, S. C. (1984). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maynard, D. W., & Wilson, T. P. (1980). On the reification of social structure. In McNall, S. G. (ed.), Current perspectives in social theory (Vol. 1.) New York: JAI. 287–22.
Meehan, A. J. (1983). For the record: Organizational and interactional practices for producing police records on juveniles. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University.
Meehan, A. J. (1984). Assessing the police-worthiness of citizens' complaints to the police: Accountability and the negotiation of “facts.” In Helm, D., Anderson, W. T., & Rawls, A. W. (eds.), The interaction order: New directions in the study of social order. New York: Irvington.
Mellinger, W. M. (1989). The production of Organizational records: The complaint-taker's construction of the “dispatch package.” Unpublished paper.
Moerman, M. (1988). Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Pomerantz, A. (1983). Giving a source or basis: The practice in conversation of telling “how I know.” Unpublished paper, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Wolfson College, Oxford, England.
Sacks, H. (1971). Unpublished lectures. University of California, Irvine.
Sacks, H. (1972a). On the analyzability of stories by children. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 325–45.
Sacks, H. (1972b). An initial investigation into the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction, New York: Free Press. 3174.
Sacks, H. (1972c). Notes on police assessment of moral character. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press. 280–93.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organizations of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:696735.
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on conversational practice: Formulating place. In Sudnow, D. (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press. 75102.
Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In Psathas, G. (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. Boston: Irvington. 2378.
Schegloff, E. A. (1981). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In Tannen, D. (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 7193.
Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as an achievement. Human Studies 9:111–51.
Schegloff, E. A. (1987a). Between macro and micro: Contexts and other connections. In Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., Muench, R., & Smelser, N. J. (eds.), The micro-macro link. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1987b). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly 50:101–14.
Schegloff, E. A. (in press). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (eds.).
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 7:289327.
Sharrock, W. W., & Turner, R. (1978). On a conversational environment for equivocality. In Schenkein, J. (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic. 173–97.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1982). Conversation analysis. In Scherer, K. R. & Ekman, P. (eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 506–41.
Whalen, J., Zimmerman, D. H., & Whalen, M. R. (1988). When words fail: A single case analysis. Social Problems 35:335–62.
Whalen, M. R., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly 50:172–85.
Wilson, T. P. (in press). Social structure and social interaction. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (eds.).
Zimmerman, D. H. (1969a). Tasks and troubles: The practical bases of work activities in a public assistance organization. In Hansen, D. A. (ed.), Explorations in sociology and counseling. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. 237–66.
Zimmerman, D. H. (1969b). Record-keeping and the intake process in a public welfare agency. In Wheeler, S. (ed.), On record: File and dossiers in American life. New York: Russel Sage Foundation. 319–54.
Zimmerman, D. H. (1978). Norms in everyday life. Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Sociologie und Socialpsychologie 30:8699.
Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Talk and ils occasion: The case of calling the police. In Schiffrin, D. (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications. (Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics 1984.) Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 201–08.
Zimmerman, D. H. (1988). On conversation: The conversation analytic perspective. Communication Yearbook 11:406–32.
Zimmerman, D. H. (in press). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (eds.), Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zimmerman, D. H., & Boden, D. (in press). Structure in action. In D. Boden & D. H. Zimmerman (eds.).

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed