Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Eating together multimodally: Collaborative eating in mukbang, a Korean livestream of eating

  • Hanwool Choe (a1)

Abstract

Mukbang is a Korean livestream where a host eats while interacting with viewers. The eater ‘speaks’ to the viewers while eating and the viewers ‘type’ to each other and to the eater through a live chat room. Using interactional sociolinguistics along with insights from conversation analysis (CA) studies, the present study examines how sociable eating is jointly and multimodally achieved in mukbang. Analyzing sixty-seven mukbang clips, I find that mukbang participants coordinate their actions through speech, written text, and embodied acts, and that this coordination creates involvement and, by extension, establishes both community and social agency. Specifically, recruitments are the basic joint action of eating, as participants, who are taking turns, assume footings of the recruit and the recruiter. The host embodies viewers’ text recruitments through embodied animating and puppeteering. As in street performance, the viewers often offer voluntary donations, and the host shows entertaining gratitude in response. (Mukbang, footing, recruitments, agency, involvement, constructed action, multimodal interaction, computer-mediated discourse)*

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Hanwool Choe, Linguistics Department, Georgetown University, 1421 37th Street NW Poulton, Hall 240, Box 571051, Washington, DC 20057-1051, USAhc563@georgetown.edu

Footnotes

Hide All
*

This article began as a paper written for seminars taught by Mark Sicoli. I am grateful to him for the feedback he provided at that stage. I am also grateful to Cynthia Gordon and Deborah Tannen for detailed feedback on several revised versions, and to Jen McFadden for editing assistance. I would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor, Jenny Cheshire, for their helpful suggestions. All remaining errors are my own.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
AFP/Relaxnews (2013). Meok-bang trend in South Korea turns binge eating into spectator sport. Huffington Post, December. Online: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/12/18/meok-bang-trend_n_4467240.html.
Ahearn, Laura M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30:109–37.
Akiyama, Yuka (2016). Learner beliefs and corrective feedback in telecollaboration: A longitudinal investigation. System 64:5873.
Al Zidjaly, Najma (2009). Agency as an interactive achievement. Language in Society 38(2):177200.
Aoki, Hiromi (2011). Some functions of speaker head nods. In Streeck, Goodwin, & LeBaron, 93–105.
Birdwhistell, Ray L. (1970). Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1993). ‘You gotta know how to tell a story’: Telling, tales, and tellers in American and Israeli narrative events at dinner. Language in Society 22(3):361402.
Buccini, Anthony F. (2013). Linguistics and food studies: Structural and historical connections. In Albala, Ken (ed.), Routledge international handbook of food studies, 146–58. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Campbell, John Edward (2003). Always use a modem: Analyzing frames of erotic play, performance, and power in cyberspace. Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronique de Communication 13(1). Online: www.cios.org/www/ejc/v13n1.htm; accessed August 10, 2008.
Choi, Jiwon (2015). South Korea's passion for watching strangers eat goes mainstream. ABC news, April. Online: http://abcnews.go.com/International/south-koreas-passion-watching-strangers-eat-mainstream/story?id=30124160.
Clark, Hubert H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Hubert H. (2006). Social actions, social commitments. In Levinson, Stephen & Enfield, Nick (eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and human interaction, 126–50. Oxford: Berg Press.
Clayman, Steven E., & Heritage, John (2014). Benefactors and beneficiaries: Benefactive status and stance in the management of offers and requests. In Drew, Paul & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (eds.), Requesting in social interaction, 5586. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Drew, Paul, & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2014). Requesting: From speech act to recruitment. In Drew, Paul & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (eds.), Requesting in social interaction, 134. Philadelphia. PA: John Benjamins.
Erickson, Frederick (1982). Money tree, lasagna bush, salt and pepper: Social construction of topical cohesion in a conversation among Italian-Americans. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text & talk, 4370. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Erickson, Frederick, & Shultz, Jeffrey (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interview. New York: Academic Press.
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Good, Jeffrey S., & Beach, Wayne A. (2005). Opening up gift-openings: Birthday parties as situated activity systems. Text & Talk 25(5):565–93.
Goodwin, Charles, & Goodwin, Marjorie H. (2004). Participation. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 222–44. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Goodwin, Marjorie H., & Cekaite, Asta (2014). Orchestrating directive trajectories in communicative projects in family interaction. In Drew, Paul & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (eds.), Requesting in social interaction, 185214. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Gordon, Cynthia (2009). Making meanings, creating family: Intertextuality and framing in family interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gordon, Cynthia (2015). ‘I would suggest you tell this ^^^ to your doctor’: Online narrative problem-solving regarding face-to-face patient interaction about body weight. In Gygax, Franziska & Locher, Miriam A. (eds.), Narrative matters in medical contexts across disciplines, 117–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gordon, Cynthia, & İkizoğlu, Didem (2017). ‘Asking for another’ online: Membership categorization and identity construction on a food and nutrition discussion board. Discourse Studies 19(3):253–71.
Gough, Brendan (2007). Real men don't diet: An analysis of contemporary newspaper representations of men, food and health. Social Science & Medicine 62(2):326–37.
Gumperz, John J. (1982). Discourse strategies: Studies in interactional sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herring, Susan C. (2015). New frontiers in interactive multimodal communication. In Georgakopoulou, Alexandra & Spilioti, Tereza (eds.), Routledge handbook of language and digital communication, 398402. London: Routledge.
Herring, Susan C., & Demarest, Bradford (2017). ‘I'm the first video voicethread–it's pretty sweet, I'm pumped’: Gender and self-expression on an interactive multimodal platform. ALSIC: Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d'information et de Communication 20(1). Online: http://journals.openedition.org/alsic/3007.
Hua, Zhu; Wei, Li; & Yuan, Qian (2000). The sequential organization of gift offering and acceptance in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 32:81103.
Keating, Elizabeth, & Sunakawa, Chiho (2010). Participation cues: Coordinating activity and collaboration in complex online gaming worlds. Language in Society 39(3):331–56.
Kendon, Adam (1981). Nonverbal communication, interaction, and gesture. The Hague: Mouton.
Kendon, Adam (2009). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kendrick, Kobin H., & Drew, Paul (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1):119.
Kim, Sohee, & Lee, Joyce (2014). Korea Inc targets ‘golden singles’ amid consumer slump. Routers, October. Online: http://www.reuters.com/article/southkorea-economy-singles-idUSL3N0R20Z920141029#CjQcMyeFCPjQXImO.97.
MacMartin, Clare; Coe, Jason B.; & Adams, Cindy L. (2014). Treating distressed animals as participants: I know responses in veterinarians’ pet-directed talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 47(2):151–74.
Mapes, Gwynne E. (2015). The construction of an elite-middle class: Foodie discourse in Bon Appétit Magazine. Washington, DC: Georgetown University master's thesis.
Morrow, Phillip R. (2012). Online advice in Japanese: Giving advice in an internet discussion forum. In Limberg, Holger & Locher, Miriam A. (eds.), Advice in discourse, 255–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Roberts, Felicia (2004). Speaking to and for animals in a veterinary clinic: A practice for managing interpersonal interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(4):421–46.
Robles, Jessica S. (2012). Troubles with assessments in gifting occasions. Discourse Studies 14(6):753–77.
Rosaldo, Michelle Z. (1982). The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11:203–37.
Sicoli, Mark A. (2018). Saying and doing in Zapotec: Language and joint actions in a Oaxacan village. Charlottesville: University of Virginia, ms.
Scheflen, Albert E. (1972). Body language and the social order. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Stommel, Wyke (2008). Conversation analysis and community of practice as approaches to studying online community. Language@Internet 5(5). Online: http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1537.
Streeck, Jürgen; Goodwin, Charles; & LeBaron, Curtis (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szatrowski, Polly E. (2014). Language and food: Verbal and non-verbal experiences. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Tannen, Deborah (1986). Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative. In Coulmas, Florian (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 311–32. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tannen, Deborah (1989/2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tannen, Deborah (2004). Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(4):399420.
Tannen, Deborah (2005). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. New York: Oxford University Press.
van Leeuwen, Theo (2015). Multimodality. In Tannen, Deborah, Hamilton, Heidi, & Schiffrin, Deborah (eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis, 447–65. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
Vásquez, Camilla, & Chik, Alice (2015). ‘I am not a foodie’: Culinary capital in online reviews of Michelin restaurants. Food and Foodways 23(4):231–50.
Ware, Paige D., & Kramsch, Claire (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal 89(2):190205.
Wiggins, Sally (2002). Talking with your mouth full: Gustatory mmms and the embodiment of pleasure. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35(3):311–36.
Wiggins, Sally (2013). The social life of ‘eugh’: Disgust as assessment in family mealtimes. British Journal of Social Psychology 52(3):489509.
Wiggins, Sally (2014). Family mealtimes, yuckiness and the socialization of disgust responses by preschool children. In Polly E. Szatrowski (ed.), Language and food: Verbal and nonverbal experiences, 211–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wiggins, Sally; Potter, Jonathan; & Wildsmith, Aimee (2001). Eating your words: Discursive psychology and the reconstruction of eating practices. Journal of Health Psychology 6(1):515.
Zappavigna, Michele (2014). Coffeetweets: Bonding around the bean on Twitter. In Seargeant, Philip & Tagg, Caroline (eds.), The language of social media: Identity and community on the internet, 139–60. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zinken, Jörg, & Rossi, Giovanni (2016). Assistance and other forms of cooperative engagement. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(1):2026.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language in Society
  • ISSN: 0047-4045
  • EISSN: 1469-8013
  • URL: /core/journals/language-in-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed