Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The relevance of repair for classroom correction

  • DOUGLAS MACBETH (a1)
Abstract

This article attempts to align a familiar task of classroom teaching, eliciting from students correct answers about their lessons, with a major organizational domain in studies of natural conversation, that of conversational repair. Numerous studies have analyzed correction sequences in classroom discourse, and our discussion pays special attention to McHoul's (1990) treatment of “repair in classroom talk.” McHoul directly measures the findings on repair in studies of natural conversation to the regularities of correction sequences in classroom lessons. It is argued, contra McHoul, that repair is a different, and prior, order of discursive work, and one that premises the very possibility of classroom correction. Further, the difference may have wider relevance for understanding repair and correction as “co-operating” organizations of talk-in-interaction more generally.

Copyright
References
Hide All

REFERENCES

Au, Kathryn, & Kawakami, Alice (1994). Cultural congruence in instruction. In E. Hollins et al. (eds.), Teaching diverse populations, 524. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Bateson, Gregory, & Mead, Margaret (1942). Balinese character. New York Academy of Sciences.
Bellack, A.; Kliebard, H. K.; Hyman, R.T.; & Smith, F. L., Jr. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Billig, Michael (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society 10:54358.
Bloome, David; Puro, Pamela; & Theodorou, Ernie (1989). Procedural display and classroom lessons. Curriculum Inquiry 19:26591.
Brown, John; Collins, Allan; & Duguid, Paul (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18:3242.
Bruner, Jerome (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cazden, Courtney (1988). Classroom discourse: The learning of teaching and learning. London: Heinmann Educational Books.
Chaiklin, Seth, & Lave, Jean (1993). Understanding practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cook-Gumperz, Jenny (1986). The social construction of literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, Judy (1984). Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J. M. Atkinson & J. C. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 10228. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, Paul (1981). Adults' corrections of children's mistakes. In French & Maclure, 24467.
Erickson, Frederick (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd ed., 11961. New York: Macmillan.
Fairclough, Norman (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
French, Peter, & Maclure, Margaret (1981). Adult–child conversation. New York: St. Martins.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Garfinkel, Harold, & Sacks, Harvey (1970). The formal properties of practical action. In J. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (eds.), Theoretical sociology, 33765. New York: Appleton-Crofts.
Gee, James (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology and discourses. 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis.
Goffman, Erving (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Green, Judith, & Wallat, Cynthia (1981). Ethnography and language in educational settings. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Greiffenhagen, Christian; Birmingham, Peter; & Watson, Rod (2003). An ethnomethodological take on ‘repair’: Pupils, corrections and computers. Paper presented to the International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Guiterrez, Kris; Larson, Joanne; & Kreuter, Betsy (1995). Cultural tensions in the scripted classroom: The value of the subjugated perspective. Urban Education 29:41042.
Gumperz, John (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
Hester, Stephen, & Eglin, Peter (1997). Culture in action: Studies in member categorisation analysis. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, and University Press of America.
Heap, James (1982). Understanding classroom events: A critique of Durkin, with an alternative. Journal of Reading Behavior 14:391411.
Heap, James (1985). Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: Reading lessons. Curriculum Inquiry 15:24579.
Heap, James (1990). Applied ethnomethodology: Looking for the local rationality of reading activities. Human Studies 13:3972.
Hindmarsh, Jon, & Heath, Christian (2000). Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32:185578.
Jefferson, Gail (1972). Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 294338. New York: Free Press.
Jefferson, Gail (1974). Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society 2:18199.
Jefferson, Gail (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization, 86100. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Kirshner, David, & Whitson, James (1997). Situated cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lave, Jean (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lave, Jean, & Wenger, Etienne (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, Carol (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly 30:60830.
Lee, Yo An (2001). Towards a respecification of L2 communicative competence: Interactional fluency and L2 instruction. Dissertation, School of Teaching and Learning, Ohio State University.
Lemke, Jay L. (1995). Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.
Lerner, Gene (1996). Finding ‘face’ in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 59:30321.
Levinson, Stephen (1983). Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Luke, Allan, & Freebody, Peter (1997). Shaping the social practices of reading. In S. Musprat et al. (eds.), Constructing critical literacies, 185225. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Lynch, Michael (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, Michael, & Bogen, David (1996). Spectacle of history: Speech, text and memory at the Iran–Contra hearings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Macbeth, Douglas (1990). Classroom order as practical action. British Journal of Sociology of Education 11:189214.
Macbeth, Douglas (1991). Teacher authority as practical action. Linguistics and Education 3:281314.
Macbeth, Douglas (2000). Classrooms as installations. In S. Hester & J. Hughes (eds.), The local education order, 2173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Macbeth, Douglas (2003). Learning lessons reconsidered: On the differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom discourse. American Educational Research Journal 40:23980.
McHoul, Alec (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society 7:182213.
McHoul, Alec (1990). The organization of repair in classrooms. Language in Society 19:34977.
Mehan, Hugh (1978). Structuring school structure. Harvard Educational Review 48:3264.
Mehan, Hugh (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Michaels, Sarah (1981). Sharing time: Children's narrative style and differential access to literacy. Language in Society 10:43242.
Mills, C. Wright (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review 5:90413.
Moerman, Michael, & Sacks, Harvey (1971 [1988]). On ‘understanding’ in the analysis of natural conversation. In M. Moerman, Talking culture, 18086. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Newman, Denis; Griffen, Peg; & Cole, Michael (1989). The construction zone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Payne, George, & Hustler, David (1980). Teaching the class: The practical management of a cohort. British Journal of Sociology of Education 1:4966.
Peterson, A. D. C. (1952). A hundred years of education. London: Gerald Duckworth.
Phillips, Susan (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom. In C. Cazden et al. (eds.), Functions of language in the classroom, 37094. New York: Teachers College Press.
Pomerantz, Anita (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, 79112. New York: Academic Press.
Pomerantz, Anita (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 57101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Resnick, Lauren; Levine, John; & Teasley, Stephanie (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rogoff, Barbara (1990). The cultural context of cognitive activity. In B. Rogoff (ed.), Apprenticeship in thinking, 4261. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ryle, Gilbert (1984). The concept of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sacks, Harvey (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In John Gumperz & Dell Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics, 32945. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Sacks, Harvey (1987). The preference for agreement and contiguity. In G. Button & R. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization, 5469. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation. 2 vols. Ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, & Schegloff, Emanuel (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 1521. New York: Irvington.
Sacks, Harvey; Schegloff, Emanuel; & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:696735.
Sacks, Harvey; Schegloff, Emanuel; Jefferson, Gail (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53:36182.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 75119. New York: Free Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. XII, 26188. New York: Academic Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1987a). Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation's turn-taking organization. In G. Button & R. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization, 7085. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1987b). Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics 25:21018.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1989). Reflections on language, development, and the interactional character of talk-in-interaction. In M. Bornstein & J. Bruner (eds.), Interaction in human development, 13953. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. Resnick et al. (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 15071. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97:12951345.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23:499545.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1998). Reply to Wetherell. Discourse and Society 9:41316.
Schegloff, Emanuel (1999). ‘Schegloff's texts’ as Billig's data: A critical reply. Discourse and Society 10:55872.
Searle, John (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharrock, Wes, & Anderson, Robert (1982). Talking and teaching: Reflective comments on in-classroom activities. In Payne &Hustler (eds.), Doing teaching, 17083. London: Batesford.
Sharrock, Wes (1986). The ethnomethodologists. London: Tavistock.
Sinclair, J. M, & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. London: Oxford University Press.
Van Lier, Leo (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
Weeks, Peter (1985). Error–correction techniques and sequences in instructional settings: Toward a comparative framework. Human Studies 8:195233.
Wells, Gordon (1993). Reevaluating the IRF Sequence. Linguistics and Education 5:137.
Wells, Gordon (1996). Using the tool-kit of discourse in the activity of learning and teaching. Mind, Culture and Activity 3(2):74101.
Wetherell, Margaret (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analyses and post–structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society 9:387412.
Wilson, Thomas (1971). Normative and interpretive paradigms in sociology. In J. Douglas (ed.), Understanding everyday life, 5779. Chicago: Aldine.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language in Society
  • ISSN: 0047-4045
  • EISSN: 1469-8013
  • URL: /core/journals/language-in-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 156 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 500 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 13th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.