A history of modern linguistics: From the beginnings to World War II. By James McElvenny. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2024. Pp. ix, 202. ISBN 9781474470025. $29.95.
Review products
A history of modern linguistics: From the beginnings to World War II. By James McElvenny. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2024. Pp. ix, 202. ISBN 9781474470025. $29.95.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
01 January 2026
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Anderson, Stephen R.2021. Phonology in the twentieth century. 2nd edn.Berlin: Language Science. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5509618.Google Scholar
Bleaman, Isaac. 2017. Uriel Weinreich: Contact linguist, historical linguist, and Yiddishist par excellence. Journal of Jewish Languages5. 131–43. DOI: 10.1163/22134638-05021135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, William (ed.) 1966. Sociolinguistics: Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference, 1964. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience L., Webster, Anthony K.; and Woodbury, Anthony C.. 2017. A holistic humanities of speaking: Franz Boas and the continuing centrality of texts. International Journal of American Linguistics83. 41–78. DOI: 10.1086/689547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Andrew. 2023. The unnaming of Kroeber Hall: Language, memory, and Indigenous California. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchat, L.1902. L'unité phonétique dans le patois d'une commune. Aus romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen: Festschrift Heinrich Morf, 175–232. Halle: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules, and Edmont, Edmond. 1902–1912. Atlas linguistique de la France. 8 vols. Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
Gyarmathi, Sámuel. 1799. Affinitatis linguae Hungaricae cum linguis Fennicae originis grammatice demonstrata. Göttingen: Joann Christian Dieterich.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.1951. Methods in structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haylperin, F., and Vaynraykh, M.. 1928–1929. Praktishe gramatik fun der yidisher shprakh. Vilnius: B. Kletskin.Google Scholar
Jaberg, Karl, and Jud, Jakob. 1928–1940. Sprach- und Sachatlas Italiens und der Südschweiz. 8 vols. Bern: Zofingen.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K.2001. William Labov and the origins of sociolinguistics. Folia Linguistica Historica22. 1–40. DOI: 10.1515/flih.2001.22.1-2.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1939. Handbook of the linguistic geography of New England. With the collaboration of Marcus L. Hansen, Bernard Bloch, and Julia Bloch. Washington, DC: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word19. 273–309. DOI: 10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Guin, Ursula K.2019. Always coming home. Author's expanded edition, ed. by Attebery, Brian. New York: Library of America. (‘Written Kesh’, pp. 575–81; ‘Glossary’, pp. 593–615; ‘Kesh syntax’, pp. 682–87.).Google Scholar
Lowie, Robert. 1937. The history of ethnological theory. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.Google Scholar
McElvenny, James. 2018. Language and meaning in the age of modernism: C. K. Ogden and his contemporaries. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
McElvenny, James (ed.) 2023. The limits of structuralism: Forgotten texts in the history of modern linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 2004. Saussure and Indo-European linguistics. The Cambridge companion to Saussure, ed. by Sanders, Carol, 9–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CCOL052180051X.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osthoff, Hermann. 1878. Formassociation bei zahlwörtern. Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen1. 92–132. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139600101.004.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H.1967. A short history of linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1878. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indoeuropéenes. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique, ed. by Bally, Charles and Sechehaye, Albert. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes. 1872. Die Verwandtschaftsverhaltnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar
Stocking, George W.Jr.1995. After Tylor: British social anthropology, 1888–1951. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Moritz. 1880. Besprechungen einiger schulbücher nebst bemerkungen über die r-laute. Anglia3. 204–22.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact: Findings and problems. New York: Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110802177.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William; and Herzog, Marvin I.. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, ed. by Lehmann, Winfred P. and Malkiel, Yakov, 95–188. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Winteler, Jost. 1876. Die kerenzer Mundart des Kantons Glarus in ihren Grundzügen dargestellt. Leipzig: C. F. Winter.Google Scholar