Hostname: page-component-6b88cc9666-vmb8t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-12T07:35:54.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tone assignment in Hong Kong English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Lian-Hee Wee
Lian-Hee Wee*
Affiliation:
Hong Kong Baptist University
*
Department of English Language and Literature, Hong Kong Baptist University, Waterloo Road, Kowloon Tong, KL Hong Kong SAR, China [lianhee@hkbu.edu.hk]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article provides an argument for Hong Kong English being a tonal language and informs the growing literature on word- and phrase-level prosody interactions. By teasing apart tonal effects that come from intonation and those that come from the word boundary, a clear picture emerges that H tones are assigned in all combinations to HKE di- and trisyllabic words. Tone spreading and blocking across words can also be seen in HKE, but syllables lexically specified for H never give up their tones. Complexity in HKE tone patterns arises when the H tones interact with boundary tones, such as the declarative final L% and the word-initial M.

Keywords

toneboundaryintonationHong KongEnglish

Information

Type
Phonological Analysis
Information
Language , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. e67 - e87
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Boersma, Paul, and Weenink, David. 2012. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.23. Online: http://www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley. 2002. Hong Kong English: Autonomy and creativity. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley. 2003. Chinese Englishes: A sociolinguistic history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley, and Lim, Shirley. 2000. Futures for Hong Kong English. World Englishes 19. 429–43. DOI: 10.1111/1467-971X.00191.Google Scholar
Chan, Yuen-Ying. 2000. The English-language media in Hong Kong. World Englishes 19. 323–35. DOI: 10.1111/1467-971X.00182.Google Scholar
Chen, Shuwen, and Mok, Peggy P. К.. 2015. Question intonation in Hong Kong English: Interaction between Cantonese and English. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Glasgow. Online: http://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0272.pdf.Google Scholar
Cheung, Winnie H. Y. 2009. Span of high tones in Hong Kong English. Berkeley Linguistics Society 35. 72–82. DOI: 10.3765/bls.v35i1.3599.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul. 1999. Tone and prominence. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, ms. Online: http://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/343.Google Scholar
de Lacy, Paul. 2002. The interaction of tone and stress in optimality theory. Phonology 19. 1–32. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675702004220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, San. 2008. A two-accent model of Japanese word prosody. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 28. 29–48. Online: http://twpl.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/twpl/article/view/6134.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2014. Disentangling stress and pitch accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. Word stress: Theoretical and typological issues, ed. by van, Harry Hulst, der, 83–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2012. Tone and intonation in Cantonese English. Proceedings of the third international symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL-2012), paper O3-04. Online: http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/tal_2012/tl12_O3-04.html.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2014. On the intonation of tonal varieties of English. The Oxford handbook of world Englishes, ed. by Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, and Sharma, Devyani. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199777716.013.29.Google Scholar
Herman, Rebecca. 1996. Final lowering in Kipare. Phonology 13. 171–96. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675700002098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, Tony T. N. 2000. Towards a phonology of Hong Kong English. World Englishes 19. 337–56. DOI: 10.1111/1467-971X.00183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, Tony T. N. 2005. Word stress in Hong Kong English: A preliminary study. HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies 9. 29–40. Online: http://lc.hkbu.edu.hk/book/pdfv09_03.pdf.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry Μ. 2006. Word-prosodic typology. Phonology 23. 225–57. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675706000893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry Μ. 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31. 213–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, Shunichi. 2000. Continuous linguistic tonetic representation using polynomial residuals. Proceedings of the 8th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, ed. by Michael Barlow, 218–23.Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert Keith. 1994. Language policy and planning in Hong Kong. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 14. 177–99. DOI: 10.1017/S0267190500002889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 2008. Intonationalphonology. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laniran, Yetunde. 1992. Intonation in tone languages: The phonetic implementation of tones in Yoruba. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.Google Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2009. Revisiting English prosody: (Some) New Englishes as tone languages? English World-Wide (Special issue: The typology of Asian Englishes, ed. by Lim, Lisa and Gisborne, Nikolas) 30.2.218–39. DOI: 10.1075/eww.30.2.06lim.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2011. Tone in Singlish: Substrate features from Sinitic and Malay. Creoles, their substrates and language typology (Typological studies in language 95), ed. by Lefebvre, Claire, 271–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa. 2014. Yesterday’s founder population, today’s Englishes: The role of the Peranakans in the (continuing) evolution of Singapore English. The evolution of Englishes, ed. by Buschfeld, Sarah, Hoffmann, Thomas, Huber, Magnus, and Kautzsch, Alexander, 401–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lo, Lo Anna Wing. 2015. Impact of lexical prosody on word identification by Hong Kong English users. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Baptist University honors project.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang Kwong. 2000. Phonological re-interpretation: The assignment of Cantonese tones to English words. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics (ICCL), National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Luke, Kang Kwong, and Richards, Jack С.. 1982. English in Hong Kong: Function and status. English World-Wide 3. 47–64. DOI: 10.1075/eww.3.1.04kan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. 1992. Describing the phonology of non-native varieties of a language. World Englishes 11. 111–28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.1992.tb00056.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, E-Ching. 2011. Reconciling stress and tone in Singaporean English. Asian Englishes: Changing perspectives in a globalised world, ed. by Zhang, Lawrence J., Rubdy, Rani, and Alsagoff, Lubna, 48–59. Singapore: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Ng, E-Ching. 2012. Chinese meets Malay meets English: Origins of Singaporean English word-final high tone. International Journal of Bilingualism (Special issue: New perspectives on transfer among bilinguals and L2 users, ed. by Treffers-Daller, Jeanine and Sakel, Jeanette) 16.1.83–100. DOI: 10.1177/1367006911403216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, Terence T. T. 2003. Hong Kong English: A stillborn variety? English Today 19.1218. DOI: 10.1017/S0266078403002037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B., and Beckman, Mary E.. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, Shih, Chi-lin; and Nibert, Holly. 1996. Pitch downtrend in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 24. 445–73. DOI: 10.1006/jpho.1996.0024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setter, Jane, Wong, Cathy S. P.; and Chan, Brian H. S.. 2010. Dialects of English: Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel. 1992. Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9. 289–328. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675700001627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tay, Mary W. J. 1991. Southeast Asia and Hong Kong. English around the world: Sociolinguistic perspectives, ed. by Cheshire, Jenny, 319–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2004. Final lowering in non-final position. Journal of Phonetics 32. 313–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2003.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, Lian-Hee. 2008. Phonological patterns in the Englishes of Singapore and Hong Kong. World Englishes 27. 480–501. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.00580.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, Lian-Hee. 2013. Comparison of F0 profiles in Hong Kong Cantonese and Hong Kong English. Poster presented at the Annual Research Forum (ARF 2013), Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 31 November. Online: http://arts.hkbu.edu.hk/phonlab/Projects/ARF2013.pdf.Google Scholar
Wee, Lian-Hee, and Cheung, Winnie H. Y.. 2015. The Chinese-English instructor’s lesson for Hong Kong English. Capturing phonological shades within and across languages, ed. by Hsiao, Yuchau E. and Wee, Lian-Hee, 342–88. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Wee, Lian-Hee, and Liang, Yuan. 2015. Cong yueying jipin bijiao kan gangshiyingyu shengdiaode xingzhi [The nature of Hong Kong English tones as seen through a comparison of F0 profiles with Hong Kong Cantonese]. Yuyanxue Luncong, to appear.Google Scholar
Wells, J. С. 1990. Longman pronunciation dictionary. New York: Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. С. 2006. English intonation: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi. 2012. ProsodyPro.praat. [Praat script] Online: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/yi/ProsodyPro/, accessed August 2012.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yiu, Suki S. Y. 2015. Intonation of statements and questions in Cantonese English: Acoustic evidence from a smoothing spline analysis of variance. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Glasgow. Online: http://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS1018.pdf.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie. 2001. The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution—Typological survey and formal analysis. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar
Zhu, Xiaonong. 1999. Shanghai tonetics. (LINCOM studies in Asian linguistics 32.) Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar