Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kl59c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-24T07:27:30.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grammatical Change in a dying dialect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Nancy C. Dorian
Nancy C. Dorian*
Affiliation:
Bryn Mawr College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dying East Sutherland dialect of Scottish Gaelic shows grammatical change currently in progress in two syntactic environments, the passive and the case system. The rate of change has been rapid enough to show clear differences between the usage of the oldest and the youngest fluent speakers available, a span of just over 40 years. This permits the consideration of questions about the direction of change, the processes of change, and the rate of change, and of the utility of terminal speakers for systematic language description and historical reconstruction.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , June 1973 , pp. 413 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Linguistic Society of America 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Borgström, Carl Hj. 1968. Notes on Gaelic grammar. Celtic Studies, ed. by Carney, James and Greene, David, 12–21. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Breatnach, R. B. 1964. Characteristics of Irish dialects in process of extinction. Communications et rapports du Premier Congrès de Dialectologie Générale, 141–145. Louvain: Centre International de Dialectologie Générale.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1968. Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchat, Louis. 1905. L'unité phonétique dans le patois d'une commune. Aus romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen: Festschrift Heinrich Morf, 175–232. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Holmer, Nils. 1938. Studies on Argyllshire Gaelic. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell H. 1962. The ethnography of speaking. Anthropology and human behavior, ed. by Gladwin, T. and Sturtevant, William C., 13–53. Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington. Reprinted in Fishman, 99-138.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. Universals in linguistic theory, ed. by Bach, Emmon and Harms, Robert T., 171–204. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1964. Historical linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
MacLaren, James. n.d. Gaelic self-taught. Third edition. Glasgow: Alex MacLaren.Google Scholar
Oftedal, Magne. 1956. The Gaelic of Leurbost, Isle of Lewis. (A linguistic survey of the Gaelic dialects of Scotland, 3; Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap, supplementary vol. 4.) Oslo: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Stevick, Robert D. 1963. The biological model and historical linguistics. Lg. 39. 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zengel, Marjorie S. 1962. Literacy as a factor in language change. American Anthropologist 64.132–139. Reprinted in Fishman, 296-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar