Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-npccv Total loading time: 0.652 Render date: 2022-10-05T10:22:54.961Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Clientelism and Social Funds: Evidence from Chávez's Misiones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Abstract

The latest president in Latin America to adopt social funds on a large scale as an integral part of his government program has been Hugo Chávez Frías of Venezuela. Based on the literature on clientelism and social funds in Latin America, this article finds that Venezuela's latest experiments with social funds were influenced by political variables. It uses empirical data from the distribution of resources for some of the subnational misiones programs to show how, given increased levels of electoral competition and weak institutional constraints, the government used these funds clientelistically, even while distributing oil income to the very poor. Chávez's misiones served two very different purposes: to manipulate the political context and to distribute funds directly to the low-income population.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfredo Keller, Consultores. 2005. Escenarios Políticos. Foro de Perspectivas Económicas. Venamcham. Power Point Presentation. Caracas, December.Google Scholar
Birdsall, Nancy, and Miguel, Szekely. 2003. Bootstraps, Not Band-aids: Poverty, Equity, and Social Policy. In After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America, ed. Pedro-Pablo, Kuczynski and John, Williamson. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics. 4973.Google Scholar
Bloomberg Market Data. Oil Price Series. Venezuela: 1999–2006. Excel Data Sheet. New York: Bloomberg.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1996. Social Spending and Political Support: the “Lessons” of the National Solidarity Programme in Mexico. Comparative Politics 28, 2: 151–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusco, Valeria, Marcelo, Nazareno, and Susan, Stokes. 2004. Vote Buying in Argentina. Latin American Research Review 39, 2: 66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and María Victoria, Murillo. 2004. Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market. American Journal of Political Science 48, 4: 742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chávez Frías, Hugo. 2004. Speech, Fuerte Tiuna. November 12. Transcript. Caracas: Ministry of Defense.Google Scholar
Consejo Nacional Electoral (CNE). 2004. Estadísticas Electorales. Resultados Referéndum Revocatario 2004. Caracas.Google Scholar
Contraloría General de la República. 2002. Informe definitivo de la evaluación selectiva de aspectos de formulación, ejecución y resultados del proyecto de acción e integración social del Proyecto Bolívar 2000. Caracas: Contraloría General. Mss.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidential Partyarchy and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornia, Giovanni, and Sanjay, Reddy. 2001. The Impact of Adjustment Related Social Funds on Income Distribution and Poverty. Discussion Paper 2001/1. Helsinki: World Institute for Development Economics Research.Google Scholar
DATOS. 2004. El consumidor venezolano. Foro de perspectivas sociales. Power Point Presentation. Venamcham, June.Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, and John, Londregan. 1996. The Determinants of Success of Special Interest in Redistributive Politics. Journal of Politics 58, 4: 1132–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecoanalítica (Caracas). 2006. ?Qué está pasando en Pdvsa? aǹo 2, no. 10: 1–5.Google Scholar
Hausmann, Ricardo. 2003. Venezuela Growth Implosion: A Neoclassical Story? In In Search of Prosperity, ed. Dani, Rodrik. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hausmann, Ricardo, and Roberto, Rigobón. 2002. An Alternative Interpretation of the “Resource Curse”: Theory and Policy Implications. Working Paper. Cambridge: Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
González-Pacheco, Rosa Amelia. 2004. Las organizaciones de ciudadanos y la política en Venezuela. Caracas: IESA.Google Scholar
Graham, Carol, and Cheikik, Kane. 1998. Opportunistic Government or Sustaining Reform? Electoral Trends and Public Expenditure Patterns in Peru, 1990–1995. Latin American Research Review 33, 1: 67–104.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IADB). 2004. Key Areas of Bank Action. Annual Report. Washington DC: IADB.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, Robert R., and Alex, Segura-Ubiergo. 2001. Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Social Spending in Latin America. World Politics 53, 4: 553–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, Miriam. 2005. Elections versus Democracy. Journal of Democracy 16, 1: 124–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Lista: un pueblo bajo sospecha . 2006. Film. Directed by Oscar Lucien. Distributed by Ciudadania Activa, Caracas.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, Alberto Díaz, Cayeros, and Federico, Estévez. 2002. The Erosion of Party Hegemony, Clientelism, and Portfolio Diversification: the Programa Nacional de Solidaridad (Pronasol) in Mexico. Paper delivered in the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 20.Google Scholar
Misión, Mercal. Information on number of stores in states and municipalities in Venezuela. http://www.mercal.gob.ve Accessed November 2004.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Planificación y Desarrollo. 2001. Sistema Integrado de Indicadores Sociales de Venezuela (Sisov). Dataset. http://www.sisov.gob.ve Accessed March 2006.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Planificación y Desarrollo. Fundación Escuela de Gerencia Social. 2004. Base de Datos Social. Spreadsheet.Google Scholar
Molinar, Juan, and Jeffrey, Weldon. 1994. Electoral Determinants and Consequences of National Solidarity. In Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy, ed. Wayne, Cornelius, Ann, Craig, and Jonathan, Fox. La Jolla: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Morley, Samuel, and David, Coady. 2003. From Social Assistance to Social Development: Targeted Education Subsidies in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
Obuchi, Richard, Rosa Amelia, González-Pacheco, Francisco, Monaldi, and Michael, Penfold. 2004. Political Institutions, Policy Making Processes and Policy Outcomes in Venezuela. Washington, DC: Research Department, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Penfold, Michael. 1999. Sistema de partidos, presidencialismo y cambio electoral. Debates IESA no. 11. Caracas: IESA. October.Google Scholar
Penfold, Michael, and José Manuel, Puente. 2000. Mitos y realidades del gasto social en Venezuela. Debates IESA vol. 6. Caracas: IESA.Google Scholar
Riutort, Matías. 2002. La pobreza en el trienio 1999–2001. Caracas: Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales, Universidad Católica Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth. 1995. Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America: the Peruvian Case. World Politics 48: 82116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James, and Thierry, Verdier. 2003. The Political Economy of Clientelism. Working Paper. Berkeley: Department of Political Science, University of California.Google Scholar
Rocha-Menocal, Alina. 2001. Do Old Habits Die Hard? a Statistical Exploration of the Politicisation of Progresa, Mexico's Latest Federal Poverty Alleviation Programme, under the Zedillo Administration. Journal of Latin American Studies 33, 3: 513–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schady, Norbert R. 2000. The Political Economy of Expenditures by the Peruvian Social Fund, 1991–1995. American Political Science Review 94, 2: 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siri, Gabriel. 2000. Employment and Social Investment Funds in Latin America. Socio-Economic Technical Papers (Setp) no. 7. International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Szekely, Miguel. 2001. The 1990s in Latin America: Another Decade of Persistent Inequality, But with Somewhat Lower Poverty. Research Department Working Paper 409. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Trinkunas, Harold. 2002. The Crisis in Venezuelan Civil-Military Relations: from Punto Fijo to the Fifth Republic. Latin American Research Review 37, 1: 41–76.Google Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2005. Partisanship and Protest: The Politics of Workfare Distribution in Argentina. Working Paper. New York: Department of Political Science, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 1999. Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics 31, 4: 379–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Clientelism and Social Funds: Evidence from Chávez's Misiones
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Clientelism and Social Funds: Evidence from Chávez's Misiones
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Clientelism and Social Funds: Evidence from Chávez's Misiones
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *