Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-xnzfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-08T23:40:32.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Didn’t Brazilian Democracy Die?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2024

Marcus André Melo Open the ORCID record for Marcus André Melo [Opens in a new window]  and
Carlos Pereira Open the ORCID record for Carlos Pereira [Opens in a new window]
Marcus André Melo
Affiliation:
Marcus André Melo is a professor at the Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, Brazil. marcus.cmelo@gmail.com.
Carlos Pereira
Affiliation:
Carlos Pereira is a professor at the Professor, Getúlio Vargas Foundation (FGV), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. carlos.pereira@fgv.br.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Brazil, for many scholars and pundits, showcased the risk of democratic breakdown with the election of a far-right populist like Jair Bolsonaro. Against pessimistic expectations, however, not only has Brazilian democracy survived but politics has returned to business as usual. What can explain this supposedly unanticipated outcome? This article provides an analytical assessment of this this puzzle and offers an alternative explanation. We argue that both the diagnoses of Brazilian institutions and the predictions made were misguided. We explore the role played by the Supreme Court, party system, media, and congressional politics in restricting Bolsonaro’s illiberal initiatives.

Keywords

democratic resiliencedemocratic backslidingBrazilpopulismBolsonaro

Information

Type
Country Notes
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , November 2024 , pp. 133 - 152
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Miami

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

A previous version of this manuscript was presented to the panel “Democracy, Law and Populism in Latin America” at the 27th World Congress of the International Political Science Association (IPSA) that took place in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on July 19 2023. We are grateful to Adam Przeworski, Wendy Hunter, Barry Ames, Alfred Montero, Gabriel Negretto, Ivan Jucá, Gregory Michener, Matthew Taylor, Sérgio Abranches, Diego Arguelhes, Daniel Brinks, Lucas Novaes, and three anonymous referees for their valuable comments on and suggestions. This article is also part of our book manuscript entitled Por que a democracia brasileira não morreu? due to be published in May 2024.

References

Arguelhes, Diego W. 2022. Public Opinion, Criminal Procedure, and Legislative Shields: How Supreme Court Judges Have Checked President Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2022/04/25/public-opinion-criminal-procedures-and-legislative-shields-how-supreme-court-judges-have-checked-president-jair-bolsonaro-in-brazil/. Accessed July 10, 2023.Google Scholar
Arguelhes, Diego, and Recondo, Felipe. 2023. Nem carta branca, nem ditadura judicial. https://www.jota.info/opiniao-e-analise/artigos/nem-carta-branca-nem-ditadura-judicial-27012023. Accessed January 27, 2023.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Ana Laura, Vilhena, Oscar, and Glezer, Rubens. 2022. Bolsonaro tem recorde de vetos derrubados e menor taxa de aprovação de projetos aprovados. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/2022/12/bolsonaro-tem-recorde-de-vetos-derrubados-e-menor-taxa-de-projetos-aprovados.shtml. Accessed December 24, 2022.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. On Democratic Backsliding. Journal of Democracy 27: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2022. Questioning backsliding. Journal of Democracy 33, 4: 155–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beramendi, Pablo, Boix, Charles, and Stegmueller, Daniel. 2023. “Resilient Democracies”. Unpublished Manuscript presented in the research seminar of the Department of Political Science at UCSD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boese, Vanessa, Edgell, Amanda, Hellmeier, Sebastian, Maerz, Seraphine, and Lindbergh, Staffan. 2021. How democracies prevail: democratic resilience in two-stage process. Democratization 28, 5: 885–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brownlee, Jason, and Miao, Kenny. 2022. Why democracies survive. Journal of Democracy 33, 4: 133–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael, Edgell, Amanda, Knutsen, Carl, and Lidberg, Staffan. 2022. Causal Sequences and Long-term Democratic Development and Decline. In Why Democracies Develop and Decline, ed. Coppedge, Michael, Edgell, Amanda, Knutsen, Carl, and Lidberg, Staffan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 219–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Ros, Luciano, and Taylor, Matthew. 2022. Bolsonaro and the Judiciary: Between Accommodation and Confrontation. Ibero-Amerikanisches Institut Preußischer Kulturbesitz. https://publications.iai.spk-berlin.de/receive/iai_mods_00000132. Accessed March 01, 2022.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2014. Democracy’s Deepening Recession. The Atlantic, May 2. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/05/the-deepening-recession-of-democracy/361591/. Accessed May 02, 2014.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2015. Facing up to the Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy 26, 1: 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2022. Democracy’s Arch: From Resurgent to Imperiled. Journal of Democracy 33, 1: 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry, and Plattner, Mark. 2021. Democracy in Decline? Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gamboa, Laura. 2022. Resisting Backsliding: Opposition Strategies against the Erosion of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Huq, Azia. 2018. Democracy’s Near Misses. The Journal of Democracy 20, 4:16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Versteeg, Mila. 2020. Biding the Unbound Executive: Balances in Time of Pandemic. Public Law and legal Theory Research Paper Series #52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Versteeg, Mila. 2021. The bound executive: Emergency powers during the pandemic. International Journal of Constitutional Law 19, 5:1498–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Mark, Levinson, Stanford, and Tushnet, Mark. 2018. Constitutional Democracy Crisis? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert. 2021. Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen, Baltz, Samuel, and Vasselai, Fabricio. 2022. Political Institutions and Democracy. In Why Democracies Develop and Decline, ed. Coppedge, Michael, Edgell, Amanda, Knutsen, Carl, and Lidberg, Staffan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 163–84.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, and Power, Timothy. 2019. Bolsonaro and Brazil’s Backlash. Journal of Democracy 30, 1: 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, and Power, Timothy. 2023. Lula’s Second Act. Journal of Democracy 34, 1: 126–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, and Vega, Diego. 2022. Populism and the military: symbiosis and tension in Bolsonaro’s Brazil. Democratization 29, 2: 337–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsen, Carl, Kyle Marquardt, Brigitte Seim, Michael Coppedge, Amanda Edgell, Juraj Medzihorsky, Daniel Pemstein, Teorell, Jan, Gerring, John, and Lidberg, Staffan. 2023. Conceptual and Measurement Issues in Assessing Democratic Backsliding. Working Paper Series 140. The Variety of Democracy Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, Jordan, and Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The Populist Harm to Democracy: An Empirical Assessment. Washington, DC: Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan. 2023. Democracy’s Surprising Resilience. Journal of Democracy 34, 4: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, David. 2018. How Democracies Die. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Little, Andrew, and Meng, Anne. 2023. Subjective and Objective Measurement of Democratic Backsliding. Mimeo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llanos, Mariana, and Weber, Cordula T.. 2023. Court-Executive Relations during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Business as Usual or Democratic Backsliding? In Latin America in Times of Turbulence: Presidentialism under Stress, ed. Llanos, Mariana and Marsteintredet, Leiv. New York: Routledge, 128–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Zhaotian, and Przeworski, Adam. 2023. Democracy and its Vulnerabilities: Dynamics of Democratic Backsliding. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 18, 1: 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, Marcus. 2016. Latin America’s New Turbulence: Crisis and Integrity in Brazil. Journal of Democracy 27, 2: 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, Marcus, Negretto, Gabriel, and Pereira, Carlos. 2023. “Why Do Autocrats not always Succeed in Weakening Democracy? A Comparative Assessment of Democratic Resilience in Latin America.” Paper presented at the Four Decades of the Third wave of Democratization in Latin America Conference, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, November 27–28.Google Scholar
Melo, Marcus, and Pereira, Carlos. 2013. Making Brazil Work: Checking the President in a Multiparty System. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, Marcus, and Pereira, Carlos, (forthcoming 2024) Por que a democracia brasileira não morreu? Rio de Janeiro: Companhia das Letras Press.Google Scholar
Michener, Gregory. 2023. Transparency Versus Populism. Administration & Society 55, 4: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. 2018. The People vs. Democracy: Why our Freedom is in Danger and how to Save it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Carlos, Medeiros, Amanda, and Bertholini, Frederico. 2020. Fear of Death and Polarization: Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Revista de Administração Pública 54, 4: 952–68.Google Scholar
Pereira, Carlos, and Melo, Marcus. 2012. The Surprising Success of Multiparty Presidential Regimes. Journal of Democracy 23, 3: 156–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Carlos, and Mueller, Bernardo. 2003. Weak Parties in the Electoral Arena and Strong Parties in the Legislative Arena: The Electoral Connection in Brazil. Dados 46, 4: 735–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Linãn, Aníbal, Schmidt, Nicholás, and Vairo, Daniela. 2019. Presidential Hegemony and Democratic Backsliding in Latin America. Democratization 26, 4: 606–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Timothy. 2000. The Political Right in Post-Authoritarian Brazil: Elites, Institutions and Democratization. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2019. Crises of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Amy Erica. 2020. Covid vs. Democracy: Brazil’s Populist Playbook. Journal of Democracy 31, 4: 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2023. How Great Is the Current Danger to Democracy: Assessing the Risk with Historical Data. Comparative Political Studies 56, 12: 1924–1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2017. A Political-Strategic Approach. In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul A., Espejo, Paulina Ochoa and Ostiguy, Pierre. Oxford University Press, 48–73.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2020. Populism’s Threat to Democracy: Comparative Lessons for the United States. Perspective on Politics 18, 2: 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2022. How Populism Dies: Political Weakness of Personalistic Plebiscitarian Leadership. Political Science Quarterly 137, 1: 9–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar