Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Contributions of the Ombudsman to Human Rights in Latin America, 1982–2011

  • Erika Moreno (a1)
Abstract

Democratic institutions, ranging from constitutional provisions and electoral rules to judiciaries, have been important in improving the rights of citizens across the world. If institutions matter for human rights, then it stands to reason that institutions built specifically to protect human rights, like the human rights ombudsman, should matter too. Using a comparative case study approach, this article examines the effect of the human rights ombudsman at the regional level on several human rights measures in Latin America between 1982 and 2011. The results suggest that the presence of an ombudsman, and some of its design features, have had effects on some social and economic rights, in keeping with the broad mandate given to this office.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Andrews, Josephine T., and Montinola, Gabriella R.. 2004. Veto Players and the Rule of Law in Emerging Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 37, 1: 5587.
Beck, Thorsten, et al. 2001. New Tools and New Tests in Comparative Political Economy: the Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15 (September): 165–76.
Bormann, Nils-Christian, and Golder, Matt. 2013. Democratic Electoral Systems around the World, 1946–2011. Electoral Studies 32: 360–69.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Marie Cherif, Feryal, Downs, George W., and Smith, Alastair. 2005. Thinking inside the Box: a Closer Look at Democracy and Human Rights. International Studies Quarterly 49, 3: 439–58.
Cingranelli, David, and Filippov, Mikhail. 2010. Electoral Incentives to Protect Human Rights. Journal of Politics 72, 1: 115.
Davenport, Christian. 1995. Multidimensional Threat Perception and State Repression: an Inquiry into Why States Apply Negative Sanctions. American Journal of Political Science 39, 3 (August): 683713.
Dodson, Michael. 2006. The Human Rights Ombudsman in Central America: Honduras and El Salvador Case Studies. Essex Human Rights Review 3, 1: 2945.
Dull, Mathew, and Roberts, Patrick. 2009. Continuity, Competence, and the Succession of Senate-Confirmed Agency Appointees, 1989–2009. Presidential Studies Quarterly 39, 3: 432–53.
Escobar, Guillermo. 2011. VIII Informe sobre derechos humanos: seguridad cuidadana. Madrid: Federación Iberoamericana de Ombudsman.
Fariss, Christopher. 2014. Respect for Human Rights Has Improved over Time: Modeling the Standard of Accountability. American Political Science Review 109, 3: 122.
Finkel, Jodi. 2012. Explaining the Failure of Mexico's National Commission of Human Rights (Ombudsman's Office) after Democratization: Elections, Incentives, and Unaccountability in the Mexican Senate. Human Rights Review 13: 473–95.
Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko, Lawson-Remer, Terra, and Randolph, Susan. 2009. International SERF Index. Economic and Social Rights Empowerment Initiative, Social Science Research Council. www.serfindex.org/data.
Gale Research Co. 2010. Encyclopedia of Associations: International Organizations. Detroit: Gale Research.
Ginsburg, Tom, and Moustafa, Tamir. 2008. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
González Volio, Lorena. 2003. The Institution of the Ombudsman: the Latin American Experience. Revista IIDH 37: 219–48.
Hafner-Burton, Eilie, and Ron, James. 2007. Human Rights Institutions: Rhetoric and Efficacy, Introduction. Journal of Peace Research 44, 4: 379–83.
Hill, Larry. 2002. The Ombudsman Revisited: Thirty Years of Hawaiian Experience. Public Administration Review 62, 1: 2441.
Huber, John D., and Shipan, Charles R.. 2002. Deliberate Discretion: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, Donald W., Michael Dodson, J., and Nuzzi O'Shaughnessy, Laura. 1999. Protecting Human Rights: the Legitimacy of Judicial System Reforms in El Salvador. Bulletin of Latin American Research 18, 4: 403–21.
Keefer, Philip. 2010. Database of Political Institutions: Changes and Variable Definitions. DPI2010. Washington, DC: Development Research Group, World Bank.
Keith, Linda Camp. 2002. Constitutional Provisions for Individual Human Rights, 1976–1996: Are They More than Mere Window Dressing? Political Research Quarterly 55: 111–43.
Keith, Linda Camp. 2011. Political Repression: Courts and Law. Human Rights series, ed. Lockwood, Bert. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Keith, Linda Camp, Neal Tate, C., and Poe, Steven C.. 2009. Is the Law a Mere Parchment Barrier to Human Rights Abuse? Journal of Politics 71, 2: 644–60.
Koo, Jeon-Woo, and Ramírez, Francisco O.. 2009. National Incorporation of Global Human Rights: Worldwide Expansion of National Human Rights Institutions, 1966–2004. Social Forces 87, 3: 1321–54.
Lake, David A., and Baum, M. A.. 2001. The Invisible Hand of Democracy: Political Control and the Provision of Public Services. Comparative Political Studies 34, 6: 587621.
Leblang, David., Milner, W. T., and Poe, Stephen. 1999. Security Rights, Subsistence Rights and Liberties: a Theoretical Survey of the Empirical Landscape. Human Rights Quarterly 21, 2: 403–43.
Lebovic, James H., and Voeten, Erik. 2009. The Cost of Shame: International Organizations and Foreign Aid in the Punishing of Human Rights Violators. Journal of Peace Research 46, 1: 7997.
Longhofer, Wesley, and Schofer, Evan. 2010. National and Global Origins of Environmental Association. American Sociological Review 75: 505–33.
Maddex, Robert L. 2011. Constitutions of the World. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2002. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002. Version p4v2002e (computer file). College Park: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/index.htm.
McCarty, Nolan. 2004. The Appointments Dilemma. American Journal of Political Science 48, 3: 413–28.
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 2003. Horizontal Accountability: The Legal Institutionalization of Mistrust. In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, ed. Welna, Chris and Mainwaring, Scott. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pegram, Thomas. 2008. Accountability in Hostile times: the Role of the Peruvian Human Rights Ombudsman, 1996–2001. Journal of Latin American Studies 40, 2: 5182.
Pegram, Thomas. 2011. Weak Institutions, Rights Claims and Pathways to Compliance: the Transformative Role of the Peruvian Human Rights Ombudsman. Oxford Development Studies 39, 2: 229–50.
Powell, Emilia J., and Staton, Jeffrey K.. 2009. Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation. International Studies Quarterly 53: 149–74.
Przeworski, Adam, and Álvarez, M. M.. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reif, Linda. 2004. The Ombudsman, Good Governance and the International Human Rights System. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Renshaw, Catherine Shanahan. 2012. National Human Rights Institutions and Civil Society Organizations: New Dynamics of Engagement at Domestic, Regional and International Levels. Global Governance 18: 299316.
Simmons, Beth. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Small, Melvin, and Singer, J. David. 1982. Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816–1980. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Taylor, Matthew M., and Buranelli, Vinicius C.. 2007. Ending up in Pizza: Accountability as a Problem of Institutional Arrangement in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 49, 1 (Spring): 5987.
Tsebelis, George. 1995. Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 25, 3: 289325.
Uggla, Fredrik. 2004. The Ombudsman in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies 36, 3: 423–50.
Ungar, Mark. 2002. Elusive Reform and the Rule of Law in Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Reinner.
Wood, B. Dan, and Waterman, Richard. 1993. The Dynamics of Political-Bureaucratic Adaptation. American Journal of Political Science 37: 497528.
World Bank. 2014. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Latin American Politics and Society
  • ISSN: 1531-426X
  • EISSN: 1548-2456
  • URL: /core/journals/latin-american-politics-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 68 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 17th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.