Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Claiming the New World: Empire, Law, and Indigenous Rights in the Mohegan Case, 1704–1743

Abstract

In 1773, with the empire on the brink of revolt, the Privy Council gave the final ruling in the case of the Mohegan Indians versus the colony of Connecticut. Thus ended what one eighteenth-century lawyer called “the greatest cause that ever was heard at the Council Board.” After a decades-long battle for their rights, involving several appeals to the Crown, three royal commissions, and the highest court in the empire, the Mohegans' case against Connecticut was dismissed. The dispute centered on a large tract of land (~20,000 acres) in southeastern Connecticut, which, the Mohegans claimed, the colony had reserved for them in the late seventeenth century. Concerned that the colony had violated its agreements, the Mohegans, aided by powerful colonists with a pecuniary interest in this tract of land, appealed to the Crown for redress. As a result of this appeal, what had been a narrow dispute over land became part of a larger conflict between the Crown, the colony, and the tribe over property and autonomy in the empire.

Copyright
Corresponding author
yirush@history.ucla.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Wendy B. St. Jean , “Inventing Guardianship: the Mohegan Indians and their Protectors,” The New England Quarterly 72 (1999): 362–87

Katherine A. Hermes , “The Law of Native Americans, to 1815,” in The Cambridge History of Law in America: Volume 1. Early America (1580–1815), eds. Michael Grossberg and Christopher Tomlins (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 46

Hermes, “Jurisdiction in the Colonial Northeast: Algonquian, English and French Governance,” The American Journal of Legal History 43 (1999): 5273

Anthony Anghie , “Francisco De Vitoria and the Colonial Origins of International Law,” Social & Legal Studies 5 (1996): 321–36

Bruce Buchan , “The Empire of Political Thought: Civilization, Savagery, and the Perceptions of Indigenous Government,” History of the Human Sciences 18 (2002): 122

Barbara Arneil , John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1996)

David Armitage , “John Locke, Carolina, and the Two Treatises of Government,” Political Theory 32 (2004): 618

Stuart Banner , How the Indians Lost Their Land: Law and Power on the Frontier (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005)

Martine van Ittersum , Profit and Principle: Hugo Grotius, Natural Rights Theories and the Rise of Dutch Power in the East Indies, 1595–1615 (Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2006)

Johnson, “The Search for a Usable Indian: An Aspect of the Defense of Colonial New England,” The Journal of American History 64 (1977): 646

P. Richard Metcalf , “Who Should Rule at Home? Native American Politics and Indian-White Relations,” Journal of American History 61 (1974): 651–65

Richard Dunn , “John Winthrop, Jr., and the Narragansett Country,” The William and Mary Quarterly 13 (1956): 6886

McHugh, Aboriginal Societies and the Common Law: A History of Sovereignty, Status, and Self-Determination (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 102

Hinderaker, “The ‘Four Indian Kings’ and the Imaginative Construction of the First British Empire,” The William and Mary Quarterly 53 (1996): 487526 (quote at 488)

Joel D. Meyerson , “The Private Revolution of William Bollan,” The New England Quarterly 41 (1968): 536–50

Jill Lepore , New York Burning: Liberty, Slavery and Conspiracy in Eighteenth-Century Manhattan (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2005)

Shoemaker, A Strange Likeness: Becoming Red and White in Eighteenth-Century North America (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 17

“Wag the Imperial Dog: Indians and Overseas Empires in North America, 1650–1776,” in A Companion to American Indian History, eds. Philip J. Deloria and Neal Salisbury (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004), 4667

Merete Borch , “Rethinking the Origins of Terra Nullius,” Australian Historical Studies 32 (2001): 222–39

Countryman, “Indians, the Colonial Order, and the Social Significance of the American Revolution,” The William and Mary Quarterly 53 (1996): 342–62

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Law and History Review
  • ISSN: 0738-2480
  • EISSN: 1939-9022
  • URL: /core/journals/law-and-history-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×