Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Environmental Law and the End of the New Deal Order


“I don't think there was ever a field of law which developed as explosively and dramatically as environmental law,” David Sive, a pioneering environmental lawyer, declared in a 1982 interview. “It was the great romance.” Along with new state and federal regulatory agencies and more than a dozen major environmental statutes passed in the 1970s, fledgling public interest environmental law firms emerged as a major force in national politics. The most prominent organizations, founded between 1967 and 1971, included the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP), Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund. Public Advocates and the Center for Law in the Public Interest, two California-based firms founded during these same years, also initiated key litigation. These small but powerful legal organizations—all predominantly funded by the Ford Foundation—quickly achieved landmark victories that helped to define the early successes of modern environmentalism. They delayed the Alaskan pipeline for more than 3 years, defeated a Disney resort proposed for the Sierra Nevada mountains, and helped push the pesticide DDT off the market in the United States. The organizations also foiled myriad plans for highways, airports, and power plants and pressed agencies to implement new environmental laws in the 1970s.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Luther J. Carter , “Conservation Law I: Seeking a Breakthrough in the Courts,Science 166 (1969): 1487–491

Barry Commoner , “The Fallout Problem,Science, New Series, 127 (1958): 1023–26

Kim Phillips–Fein , “Conservatism: A State of the Field,Journal of American History 98 (2011): 723–43

Julian E. Zelizer , “Reflections: Rethinking the History of American Conservatism,Reviews in American History 38 (2010): 367–92

Frank von Hippel and Joel Primack , “Public Interest Science,Science 177 (1972): 1166–71

Robert L. Rabin , “Federal Regulation in Historical Perspective,Stanford Law Review 38 (1986): 11891326

David Ekbladh , “‘Mr. TVA’: Grass-Roots Development, David Lilienthal, and the Rise and Fall of the Tennessee Valley Authority as a Symbol for U.S. Overseas Development, 1933–1973,Diplomatic History 26 (2002): 335–74

Louis L. Jaffe , “The Effective Limits of the Administrative Process: A Reevaluation,Harvard Law Review 67 (1954): 1105–35

Louis L. Jaffe , “The Independent Agency. A New Scapegoat,Yale Law Journal 65 (1956): 1068–76

Simon Lazarus and Joseph Onek , “The Regulators and the People,Virginia Law Review 57 (1971): 1069–108

Charles A. Reich , “The New Property,Yale Law Journal 73 (1964): 733–87

Marc Galanter , “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,Law & Society Review 9 (1974): 95160

Josh Benson , “The Past Does Not Repeat Itself, but It Rhymes: The Second Coming of the Liberal Anti-Court Movement,Law & Social Inquiry 33 (2008): 1071–110

Richard B. Stewart , “The Reformation of American Administrative Law,Harvard Law Review 88 (1975): 1667–813

Adam Rome , “‘Give Earth a Chance’: The Environmental Movement and the Sixties,Journal of American History 90 (2003): 525–54

David Sive , “Some Thoughts of an Environmental Lawyer in the Wilderness of Administrative Law,Columbia Law Review 70 (1970): 612–51

Edgar S. Cahn and Jean Camper Cahn , “Power to the People or the Profession? The Public Interest in Public Interest Law,Yale Law Journal 79 (1970): 1005–48

Josiah Rector , “Environmental Justice at Work: The UAW, the War on Cancer, and the Right to Equal Protection from Toxic Hazards in Postwar America,Journal of American History 101 (2014): 480502

Robert Gordon , “‘Shell No!’: OCAW and the Labor–Environmental Alliance,Environmental History 3 (1998): 460–87

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Law and History Review
  • ISSN: 0738-2480
  • EISSN: 1939-9022
  • URL: /core/journals/law-and-history-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 50 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 341 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.