Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-97c68d4fb-zf5vn Total loading time: 0.297 Render date: 2022-04-02T19:48:28.512Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }
  • English
Law & Social Inquiry Law & Social Inquiry

Article contents

Covering Legal Mobilization: A Bottom‐Up Analysis of Wards Cove v. Atonio

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

George I. Lovell ,
Michael McCann  and
Kirstine Taylor
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop a political history of Wards Cove v. Atonio (1989) to show how Robert Cover's concepts of jurisgenesis and jurispathy can enrich the legal mobilization framework for understanding law and social change. We illustrate the value of the hybrid theory by recovering the Wards Cove workers’ own understanding of the role of litigation in their struggle for workplace rights. The cannery worker plaintiffs exemplified Cover's dual logic by articulating aspirational narratives of social justice and by critically rebuking the Supreme Court's ruling as the “death throe” for progressive minority workers’ rights advocacy. The cannery workers’ story also highlights the importance of integrating legal mobilization scholars’ focus on extrajudicial political engagement into Cover's judge‐centered analysis. Our aim is to forge a theoretical bridge between Cover's provocative arguments about law and the analytical tradition of social science scholarship on the politics of legal mobilization.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , Winter 2016 , pp. 61 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albiston, Catherine R. 2010. Institutional Inequality and the Mobilization of the Family and Medical Leave Act: Rights on Leave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldoz, Rick. 2011. The Third Asiatic Invasion: Empire and Migration in Filipino America, 1989–1946. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Barclay, Scott, Jones, Lynn C., and Marshall, Anna‐Maria. 2011. Two Spinning Wheels: Studying Law and Social Movements. In Social Movements/Legal Possibilities (Studies in Law, Politics and Society, Volume 54), ed. Sarat, Austin, 1–16. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jeb. 2004. Overruled? Legislative Overrides, Pluralism, and Contemporary Court‐Congress Relations. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick A. Jr. 1980. Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest‐Convergence Dilemma. Harvard Law Review 93:518–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, Herman. 1991. Equality Transformed: A Quarter‐Century of Affirmative Action. New York: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Bonilla‐Silva, Eduardo. 1997. Racism Without Racists: Color Blind Racism and the Persistence of Inequality in America. New York: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brest, Paul. 1976. Foreword: In Defense of the Antidiscrimination Principle. Harvard Law Review 90:1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2003. Neoliberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy. Theory and Event 7 (1). https://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/theory_and_event/v007/7.1brown.html (accessed November 20, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brigham, John. 1996. The Constitution of Interests: Beyond the Politics of Rights. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Brisbin, Richard. 2002. A Strike Like No Other Strike: Law and Resistance During the Pittson Coal Strike of 1989–1990. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bulosan, Carlos. 1996. American is in the Heart. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1991. Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology 96 (5): 1201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carle, Susan. 2011. A Social Movement History of Title VII: Disparate Impact Analysis. Florida Law Review 63 (1): 251–300.Google Scholar
Chen, Anthony S. 2006. “The Hitlerian Rule of Quotas”: Racial Conservatism and the Politics of Fair Employment Legislation in New York State, 1941–1945. Journal of American History 92 (4): 1238–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, Ronald. 2012. Remembering Silme Domingo and Gene Viernes: The Legacy of Filipino American Labor Activism. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette. 2014. Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in an Authoritarian State. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Churchill, Thomas. 1995. Triumph Over Marcos. Seattle, WA: Open Hand Publishing.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell, and Gillman, Howard, eds. 1999. Supreme Court Decision Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. 1983. The Supreme Court Term, Forward: Nomos and Narrative. Faculty Scholarship Series Paper 2705.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. 1984. Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. 1986. Violence and the Word. Yale Law Journal 95:1601–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramton, Roger C. 1995. Individualized Justice, Mass Torts, and Settlement Class Actions: An Introduction. Cornell Law Review 80:811–36.Google Scholar
Crowe, Justin. 2012. Building the Judiciary: Law, Courts, and the Politics of Institutional Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Devins, Neal. 1993. Reagan Redux: Civil Rights Under Bush. Faculty Publications Paper 429. http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/429 (accessed June 15, 2015).Google Scholar
Domingo, Cindy. 2013. The Wards Cove Case: Separate and Unequal. http://www.positivelyfilipino.com/magazine/the‐wards‐cove‐case‐separate‐and‐unequal (accessed June 15, 2015).Google Scholar
Domingo, Ligaya Rene. 2010. Building a Movement: Filipino American Union and Community Organizing in Seattle in the 1970s. PhD Diss., Graduate School of Education, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Domingo, Ligaya. 2011. Ebb and Flow: The Rank and File Movement in the Alaska Cannery Workers ILWU Local 37. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Meeting, September, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Domingo, Nemesio. 2000. Wards Cove Press Packet, August 7. UW Special Collections, Cindy Domingo Papers, Series 1, Box 4, Folder “Wards Cove.”Google Scholar
Edsall, Thomas Byrne, and Edsall, Mary D. 1992. Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore. 1977. Disproportionate Impact and Illicit Motive: Theories of Constitutional Adjudication. New York University Law Review 52:36–171.Google Scholar
Engel, David M., and Munger, Frank W. 2003. Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Lives of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskridge, William N. 1991. Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions. Yale Law Journal 101:331–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farhang, Sean. 2010. The Litigation State: Public Regulation and Private Lawsuits in the U.S. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Alan. 1998. Antidiscrimination Law from 1954 to 1989: Uncertainty, Contradiction, Realization, Denial. In The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, ed. Kairys, David, 285–311. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Friday, Chris. 1994. Organizing Asian American Labor. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Fujita‐Rony, Dorothy B. 2003. American Workers, Colonial Power: Philippine Seattle and the Transpacific West, 1919–1941. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1983. The Radiating Effects of Courts. In Empirical Theories of Courts, ed. Boyum, K. D. and Mather, L., 117–42. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Goluboff, Risa L. 2007. The Lost Promise of Civil Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, William. 1977. Black Workers in White Unions: Job Discrimination in the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. 1993 . The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary. Studies in American Political Development 7:35–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffey, Trevor. 2011. Black Power's Labor Politics: The United Construction Workers Association and Title VII Law in the 1970s. PhD Diss., Department of History, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani. 2008. Foreword: Demosprudence Through Dissent. Harvard Law Review 122:4–138.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani, and Torres, Gerald. 2014. Changing the Wind: Notes Toward a Demosprudence of Law and Social Movements. Yale Law Review 123:2740–1804.Google Scholar
Hanson, Christopher. 1991. Senate Exempts Wards Cove from Civil Rights Bill. Seattle Post‐Intelligencer, November 6, A6.Google Scholar
Hensler, Deborah R., and Moller, Erick. 2000. Class Action Dilemmas: Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
Karst, Kenneth L. 1978. The Costs of Motive‐Centered Inquiry. San Diego Law Review 15:1163–66.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas. M. 2009. Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights. Law & Society Review 43:151–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Paul A. 2006. The Blood of Government: Race, Empire, the United States, and the Philippines. Durham, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Lobel, Jules. 2003. Success Without Victory: Lost Legal Battles and the Long Road to Justice in America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lovell, George. 2003. Legislative Deferrals: Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lovell, George. 2012. This Is Not Civil Rights: Discovering Rights Talk in 1939 America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovell, George, and McCann, Michael. 2004. A Tangled Legacy: Federal Courts and the Politics of Democratic Inclusion. In The Politics of Democratic Inclusion, ed. Wolbrecht, Christina and Hero, Rodney, 257–80. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Marable, Manning. 1996. Beyond Black and White: Transforming African American Politics. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Marquardt, Steve. 1992. The Labor Activist as Labor Historian: Reforming the Alaskan Cannery Workers Union. Unpublished paper presented at the American Historical Association Annual Meeting, August 13–16.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1989. Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working Class Americans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murakawa, Naomi, and Beckett, Katherine. 2010. The Penology of Racial Innocence: The Erasure of Racism in the Study and Practice of Punishment. Law & Society Review 44 (3–4): 695–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, Laura A. 1984−1985. User Theory of Law—Fourth Annual Alfred P. Murrah Lecture. Southwestern Law Journal 38:951–64.Google Scholar
NeJaime, Douglas. 2011. Winning Through Losing. Iowa Law Review 96:941–1012.Google Scholar
Nielson, Laura Beth, Nelson, Robert L., and Lancaster, Ryon. 2010. Individual Justice or Collective Legal Mobilization: Employment Discrimination in the Post‐Civil Rights United States. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7 (2): 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omi, Michael, and Winant, Howard. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paris, Michael. 2010. Framing Equal Opportunity: Law and the Politics of School Finance Reform. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca. 2000. The Structural Context of Novel Rights Claims: Southern Civil Rights Organizing, 1961–66. Law & Society Review 34:367–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, Robert C. 2005. Who's Afraid of Jurispathic Courts?: Violence and Reason in Nomos and Narrative. Faculty Scholarship Series Paper 176. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/176 (accessed June 15, 2015).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Runkel, Philip S. 1994. The Civil Rights Act of 1991: A Continuation of the Wards Cove Standard of Business Necessity. William and Mary Law Review 35:1177–1239.Google Scholar
San Juan, E. Jr. 2009. Toward Filipino Self‐Determination: Beyond Transnational Globalization. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Kearns, Thomas R. 1991. A Journey Through Forgetting: Towards a Jurisprudence of Violence. In The Fate of Law, ed. Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas R., 209–74. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Social Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Tyree. 1989. Press Statement, June 8, 1989, UW Special Collections, Cindy Domingo Papers, Series 1, Box 9, folder “ACWA Lawsuits.”Google Scholar
Selmi, Michael. 2003. The Price of Discrimination: The Nature of Class Action Employment Discrimination and Its Effects. Texas Law Review 81:1248–1335.Google Scholar
Selmi, Michael. 2011. The Supreme Court's Surprising and Strategic Response to the Civil Rights Act of 1991. Wake Forest Law Review 46:281–304.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1986. Courts: A Comparative Political Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shoben, Elaine W. 2003−2004. Disparate Impact Theory in Employment Discrimination: What's Griggs Still Good For? What Not? Brandeis Law Journal 42:597–622.Google Scholar
Snyder, Francis. G. 1999. Nomos, Narrative, and Jurisprudence: Toward a Jurisgenetic Theory of Law. William & Mary Law Review 40:1623–1729.Google Scholar
Spann, Girardeau A. 2010. Disparate Impact. Georgetown Law Journal 98:1133–63.Google Scholar
Staszak, Sarah. 2015. No Day in Court: Access to Justice and the Politics of Judicial Retrenchment. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Robin. 2001. Disparate Impact and the Quota Debates: Law, Labor Market Sociology, and Equal Employment Policies. Sociological Quarterly, 42 (1): 13–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Robin, Scarpellino, Martha, and Holtzman, Mellissa. 1999. Political Culture Wars 1990s Style: The Drum Beat of Quotas in Media Framing of the Civil Rights Act of 1991. In Research in Social Stratification and Mobility: The Future of Affirmative Action, ed. Leicht, Kevin, 33–106. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1995. Cycles of Collective Action: Between Moments of Madness and the Repertoire of Contention. In Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action, ed. Traugott, Margaret, 89–116. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2006. Contentious Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toribio, Helen C. 1998. We are Revolution: A Reflective History of the Union of Democratic Filipinos (KDP). Amerasia Journal 24 (2): 155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn. 1983. Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System. American Political Science Review 77 (3): 690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zia, Helen. 2000. Asian American Dreams: The Emergence of an American People. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Della, David, interviewed by Michael McCann, March 8, 1998.Google Scholar
Domingo, Cindy, interviewed by Michael McCann, March 8, 1998.Google Scholar
Domingo, Nemesio, interviewed by George Lovell, March 8, 2013.Google Scholar
Scott, Tyree, interviewed by Michael McCann, March 17, 1998.Google Scholar
Woo, Michael, interviewed by Michael McCann, March 13, 1998.Google Scholar
Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co., 827 F.2d 439 (9th Cir. Sept. 1987).Google Scholar
County of Wash, Or. v. Gunther, 452 U.S. 161 (1982).Google Scholar
Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977).Google Scholar
Griggs v. Duke Power, 401 U.S. 424 (1971).Google Scholar
Hazelwood Sch. Dist. v. United States, 433 U.S. 299 (1977).Google Scholar
Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977).Google Scholar
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio, 490 U.S. 642 (1989).Google Scholar
Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. No. 88‐352, 78 Stat. 241 (July 2, 1964).Google Scholar
Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102‐166 (November 21, 1991).Google Scholar
Voting Rights Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 89‐110, 79 Stat. 437 (August 6, 1965).Google Scholar
7
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Covering Legal Mobilization: A Bottom‐Up Analysis of Wards Cove v. Atonio
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Covering Legal Mobilization: A Bottom‐Up Analysis of Wards Cove v. Atonio
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Covering Legal Mobilization: A Bottom‐Up Analysis of Wards Cove v. Atonio
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *