Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-7j4dq Total loading time: 0.405 Render date: 2022-09-25T16:03:09.350Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

The Legal Profession as a Social Process: A Theory on Lawyers and Globalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This article proposes a processual theory of the legal profession. In contrast to the structural, interactional, and collective action approaches, this processual theory conceptualizes the legal profession as a social process that changes over space and time. The social process of the legal profession includes four components: (1) diagnostic struggles over professional expertise; (2) boundary work over professional jurisdictions; (3) migration across geographical areas and status hierarchies; and (4) exchange between professions and the state. Building on the processual theory and using China as a primary example, the author proposes a research agenda for studying lawyers and globalization that seeks to shift the focus of research from the legal elite to ordinary law practitioners, from global law firms to local law firms, and from advanced economies to emerging economies.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. 1986. Jurisdictional Conflict: A New Approach to the Development of the Legal Professions. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 11:187224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 2005. Linked Ecologies. Sociological Theory 23:245274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abel, Richard L. 1988. The Legal Profession in England and Wales. Oxford/New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. 1989. American Lawyers. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. 1994. Transnational Law Practice. Case Western Reserve Law Review 44:737870.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L., and Lewis, Philip S. C., ed. 1989. Lawyers in Society, Vol. 3: Comparative Theories. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Abel‐Smith, Brian, and Stevens, Robert B. 1967. Lawyers and the Courts: A Sociological Study of the English Legal System: 1750–1965. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ajani, Gianmaria. 1995. By Chance and Prestige: Legal Transplants in Russia and Eastern Europe. American Journal of Comparative Law 43:93117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Jerold S. 1976. Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer, and Rundell, John. 1998. Blurred Boundaries: Migration, Ethnicity, Citizenship. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Berlant, Jeffrey L. 1975. Profession and Monopoly: A Study of Medicine in the United States and Great Britain. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. [1964] 1986. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Hastings Law Journal 38:805853.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burrage, Michael. 2006. Revolution and the Making of the Contemporary Legal Profession: England, France, and the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cain, Maureen. 1994. The Symbolic Traders. In Lawyers in a Postmodern World: Translation and Transgression, ed. Cain, Maureen and Harrington, Christine B., 1548. New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., and O'Barr, William M. 1997. Just Words: Law, Language, and Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant, ed. 2002a. Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 2002b. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists and the Transformation of Latin American States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 2010. Asian Legal Revivals: Lawyers in the Shadow of Empire. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, and Powell, Walter. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48:147160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinovitzer, Ronit. 2006. Social Capital and Constraints on Legal Careers. Law & Society Review 40:445479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. W. D. Halls, trans. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1992. Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. Cornelia Brookfield, trans. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elwood, William. 1989. The Road to Brown [video recording] . San Francisco, CA: California Newsreel.Google Scholar
Emerson, Richard M. 1976. Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology 2:335362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, John. 1996. Megalawyering in the Global Order: The Cultural, Social, and Economic Transformation of Global Legal Practice. International Journal of the Legal Profession 3:169195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, John. 2007. Lawyers as Sanctifiers: The Role of Elite Law Firms in International Business Transactions. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14:3566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, Marion. 2006. The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics. American Journal of Sociology 112:145194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, Valérie. 1999. The Appeal of Professionalism as a Disciplinary Mechanism. Sociological Review 47:280307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidson, Eliot. 1986. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review 9: 95160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1983. Mega‐Law and Mega‐Lawyering in the Contemporary United States. In The Sociology of the Professions: Lawyers. Doctors, and Others, ed. Dingwall, Robert and Lewis, Philis S. C., 152176. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1986. The Emergence of the Judge as a Mediator in Civil Cases. Judicature 69:257262.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary‐Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non‐Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review 48:781795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. 1985. Knowledge Mandates: Collective Influence by Scientific, Normative, and Syncretic Professions. British Journal of Sociology 36:421447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. 1986. Six Score Years and Ten: Demographic Transitions in the American Legal Profession, 1850–1980. Law & Society Review 20:5378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. 1987. Beyond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises, and Professional Empowerment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. 2009. Recursivity of Global Normmaking: A Sociolegal Agenda. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5:263289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Carruthers, Bruce G. 2007. The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm‐Making and National Law‐Making in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes. American Journal of Sociology 111:11351202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Karpik, Lucien, ed. 1997. Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political Liberalism: Europe and North America from the Eighteenth to Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., ed. 2007. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Osinsky, Pavel. 2006. Globalization of Law. Annual Review of Sociology 32:19.119.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanlon, Gerard. 1994. The Commercialisation of Accountancy: Flexible Accumulation and the Transformation of the Service Class. London: Macmillan/New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Hanlon, Gerard. 1999. Lawyers, the State, and the Market: Professionalism Revisited. London: Macmillan Business.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, John P., and Laumann, Edward O. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Nelson, Robert L., Sandefur, Rebecca L., and Laumann, Edward O. 2005. Urban Lawyers: The New Social Structure of the Bar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Homans, George C. 1958. Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology 63:597606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Everett C. 1994. On Work, Race, and the Sociological Imagination. Coser, Lewis A., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Terence J. 1972. Professions and Power. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnson, Terence J. 1982. The State and the Professions: Peculiarities of the British. In Social Class and the Division of Labour, ed. Giddens, Anthony and McKenzie, Gavin, 186208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Anthony, ed. 1991. Professions and the State: Expertise and Autonomy in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Karpik, Lucien. 1988. Lawyers and Politics in France, 1814–1950: The State, the Market, and the Public. Law & Social Inquiry 13:707736.Google Scholar
Karpik, Lucien. 1999. French Lawyers: A Study in Collective Action, 1274 to 1994. Nora Scott, trans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Krause, Elliott A. 1996. Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle, and Molnár, Virág. 2002. The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28:167195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Magali S. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Leubsdorf, John. 2001. Man in His Original Dignity: Legal Ethics in France. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Li, Xueyao, and Liu, Sida. 2012. The Learning Process of Globalization: How Chinese Law Firms Survived the Financial Crisis. Fordham Law Review 80:28472866.Google Scholar
Liu, Sida. 2006. Client Influence and the Contingency of Professionalism: The Work of Elite Corporate Lawyers in China. Law & Society Review 40:751782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Sida. 2008. Globalization as Boundary‐Blurring: International and Local Law Firms in China's Corporate Law Market. Law & Society Review 42:771804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Sida. 2011. Lawyers, State Officials, and Significant Others: Symbiotic Exchange in the Chinese Legal Services Market. China Quarterly 206:276293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Sida. 2012. Palace Wars Over Professional Regulation: In‐House Counsel in Chinese State‐Owned Enterprises. Wisconsin Law Review 2012:549571.Google Scholar
Liu, Sida, and Halliday, Terence C. 2009. Recursivity in Legal Change: Lawyers and Reforms of China's Criminal Procedure Law. Law & Social Inquiry 34:911950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Sida, and Halliday, Terence C. 2011. Political Liberalism and Political Embeddedness: Understanding Politics in the Work of Chinese Criminal Defense Lawyers. Law & Society Review 45:831865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart, Friedman, Lawrence, and Mertz, Elizabeth, ed. 2007. Law in Action: A Socio‐Legal Reader. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas S., Arango, Joaquin, Hugo, Graeme, Kouaouchi, Ali, Pellegrino, Adela, and Taylor, J. Edward. 1998. Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn, McEwen, Craig A., and Maiman, Richard J. 2001. Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working Class Americans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 2007. The Language of the Law School: Learn to “Think Like a Lawyer .” Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83:340363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Ethan. 2007. Lawyers, Political Embeddedness, and Institutional Continuity in China's Transition from Socialism. American Journal of Sociology 113:352414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, Linda D. 1997. Coercive Power in Social Exchange. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molm, Linda D. 2003. Theoretical Comparisons of Forms of Exchange. Sociological Theory 21:117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Robert E., Burgess, Ernest W., and McKenzie, Roderick D. 1967. The City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Parkin, Frank. 1979. Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Parry, Noel, and Parry, José. 1976. The Rise of the Medical Profession: A Study of Collective Social Mobility. London: Croon Helm.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1954. The Professions and Social Structure. In Essays in Sociological Theory, ed. Parsons, Talcott, 3449. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1968. Professions. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 12, 526547. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael J. 1979. Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podmore, David B. L. 1980. Solicitors and the Wider Community. London: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, and Rumbaut, Ruben G. 2006. Immigrant America: A Portrait, 3rd ed. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 1973. Lawyers and Their Society: A Comparative Study of the Legal Profession in Germany and in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 1986. Power and the Division of Labor. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 1989. Comparing Legal Professions: A State‐Centered Approach. In Lawyers in Society, Vol. 3: Comparative Theories, ed. Abel, Richard L. and Lewis, Philip S. C., 289321. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1992. State, Law and Community in the World System: An Introduction. Social & Legal Studies 1:131142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Felstiner, William L. F. 1995. Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart A., ed. 1998. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart A. 2001. Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart A., ed. 2005. The Worlds Cause Lawyers Make: Structure and Agency in Legal Practice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. [1974] 2004. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A., and Sarat, Austin. 2004. Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Law and Politics.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. [1942] 1994. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Segel, David. 2011. Is Law School a Losing Game? New York Times, January 8, BU1.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. 1995. Managing Legal Uncertainty: Elite Lawyers in the New Deal. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan, and Ewick, Patricia. 2003. Narrating Social Structures: Stories of Resistance to Legal Authority. American Journal of Sociology 108:13281372.Google Scholar
Silver, Carole. 2002. The Case of the Foreign Lawyer: Internationalizing the U.S. Legal Profession. Fordham International Law Journal 25:10391084.Google Scholar
Silver, Carole. 2006. Internationalizing U.S. Legal Education: A Report on the Education of Transnational Lawyers. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 14:143176.Google Scholar
Silver, Carole. 2007. Local Matters: Internationalizing Strategies for U.S. Law Firms. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14:6793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Carole. 2009. Agents of Globalization in Law. Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 1406131. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1406131 (accessed, October 18, 2012).Google Scholar
Silver, Carole. 2011. The Variable Value of U.S. Legal Education in the Global Legal Services Market. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 24:158.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1971. Georg Simmel on Individuality and Social Forms. Levine, Donald N., ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Tan, Gillian. 2012. King & Wood Mallesons Now in Business. Wall Street Journal, Deal Journal Australia, March 2. http://blogs.wsj.com/dealjournalaustralia/2012/03/02/march‐merger‐madness/ (accessed April 8, 2012).Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. [1835, 1840] 2000. Democracy in America. Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Delba, trans. and ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. 1984. Where the Action Is: Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism. Stanford Law Review 36:575622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, David M., Dezalay, Yves, Buchanan, Ruth, and Davis, John R. 1994. Global Restructuring and the Law: Studies of the Internationalization of the Legal Fields and the Creation of Transnational Arenas. Case Western Law Review 44:407498.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M., and Esser, John. 1989. Critical Empiricism in American Legal Studies: Paradox, Program, or Pandora's Box? Law & Social Inquiry 14:352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas. 2008. The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: A Multilevel Process Theory. American Journal of Sociology 113:9701022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Legal Profession as a Social Process: A Theory on Lawyers and Globalization
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Legal Profession as a Social Process: A Theory on Lawyers and Globalization
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Legal Profession as a Social Process: A Theory on Lawyers and Globalization
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *