We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
63. Choosing Life, Choosing Death, The Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Law and Ethics p 93.
64. Ibid, p 107.
65. Ibid, p 123.
66. Ibid, p 1.
67. Ibid, p 181.
68. Ibid, p 3, fn 2.
69. Gillon, R Ethics needs principles – four can encompass the rest – and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals” ’ (2003) 29 Journal of Medical Ethics 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70. Choosing Life, Choosing Death, The Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Law and Ethics p ix.
71. Although elsewhere in the book he complains that ‘the academic world roars out deafeningly’ in praise of autonomy: ibid, p 181.
72. There is nothing more annoying than completely unnecessary footnotes.
73. Ibid, p 181.
74. Ibid, ch 2.
75. Ibid, p 121.
76. Ibid, p 18.
77. Ibid, p x.
78. Ibid, p 108.
79. Ibid, p 52.
80. Ibid.
81. Ibid, p x.
82. Ibid.
83. Ibid.
84. Ibid, pp 149–151.
85. Anyone seeking that should look at the quite excellent recent book by Maclean, Alasdair Autonomy, Informed Consent and Medical Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
