Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:19:44.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accession as Dialogue: Epistemic Communities and the World Trade Organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2014

LISA TOOHEY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) is viewed as a major step in the development of a state, and the commitments made by acceding states are often interpreted as a symbolic commitment to international economic and political community. However, as a subject of scholarship, WTO accession is under-theorized – there has been no sustained academic attempt to build a theory that accounts for the complexity of the accession process. Traditional, positivist approaches can point to increasingly onerous terms of accession, but fail to probe past Article XII's one-dimensional concept of ‘the acceding state’ negotiating with ‘the WTO’. This perspective dislocates the accession process from the broader political, economic, and legal reforms that involve both state and non-state actors. This article examines the role of these actors as epistemic communities, and argues that these epistemic communities engage in a series of dialogues about the nature of law and the legal system in the acceding state.

Keywords

accessioninternational economic lawsocio-legal methodologyWorld Trade OrganizationWTO
Type
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND PRACTICE
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 397 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 C. Michalopoulos, ‘WTO Accession for Countries in Transition’, World Bank Working Paper 1934 (1998); Pietras, J., ‘The Role of the WTO for Economies in Transition’, in Krueger, A. (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization (1998), 353Google Scholar.

2 Statement by US Ambassador to Vietnam, Michael Marine, quoted in ‘US Strongly Backs Viet Nam's WTO Accession’, Viet Nam News, 4 July 2006.

3 H 18005, 106th Cong, 2d Sess, (14 September 2000), in 140(13) Cong Res H 18005 (19 September 2000), at 18396.

4 Zhao, L. and Wang, Y., ‘China's Pattern of Trade and Growth after WTO Accession: Lessons for Other Developing Countries’, (2009) 2 (3)JCEFTS 178, at 182Google Scholar, available online at <https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5042> (visited 29 April 2012).

5 S. Marini, ‘A Wind of Change?’, EUInside (28 November 2011), available online at <http://www.euinside.eu/en/analyses/russia-wto-accession> (visited 29 April 2012).

6 ‘Russia's Accession to the WTO Implies Far-Reaching Changes’, Moscow Times (28 February 2012), available online at <http://www.themoscowtimes.com/business/business_for_business/article/russias-accession-to-the-wto-implies-far-reaching-changes/453744.html> (visited 29 April 2012).

7 See, e.g., M. Kennett et al, Evaluating WTO Accessions: Legal and Economic Perspectives (2005); Smith, M., ‘Accession to the WTO: Key Strategic Issues’ in Schott, J. (ed.), The World Trading System: Challenges Ahead (1996), at 167Google Scholar; World Bank, WTO Accession: Lessons from Experience (2005); Charnovitz, S., ‘Taiwan's WTO Membership and Its International Implications’, (2006) 1 AJWH 401Google Scholar; P. Naray, Russia and the World Trade Organization (2001); ‘China's WTO Accession: Survey of Materials’, (2001) 4(2) JIEL, at 329; Grynberg, R. and Joy, R. M., ‘The Accession of Vanuatu to the WTO: Lessons for the Multilateral Trading System’, (2000) 34 (6)JWTL 167Google Scholar; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, WTO Accessions and Development Policies, UN Doc. UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/11 (2001), at 19, and Cai, W., ‘Vietnam's Accession to the World Trade Organization: Background and Issues’, (1996) 30 (6)JWTL, at 75Google Scholar.

8 Note, however, the concerns raised by Charnovitz in relation to this typology. Charnovitz, S., ‘Mapping the Law of WTO Accession’, (2006) George Washington University Law School Public Law and Legal Theory Series Working Paper No. 237Google Scholar, at 18–26.

9 World Trade Organization, Report of the Appellate Body China – Measures Related to the Exportation of Various Raw Materials, 22 February 2012, WTO Doc. No. WT/DS394/AB/R.

10 On the single undertaking, see M. J. Trebilcock and R. Howse, The Regulation of International Trade (2005), at 642–3.

11 World Trade Organization, Decision-Making Procedures under Articles IX and XII of the WTO Agreement Agreed by the General Council, 24 November 1995, WTO Doc. No. WT/L/93.

12 World Trade Organization, Secretariat Note on Accession to the World Trade Organization: Procedures for Negotiations under Article 12, 24 March 1995, WTO Doc. No. WT/ACC/1.

13 The GATT procedures were primarily contained in Complementary Procedures on Accession Negotiations (27 October 1993), available online at < http://www.wto.org/gatt_docs/> (visited 28 April 2008) and Management of Accession Negotiations – Statement by the Chairman of the Council, GATT Document C/COM/4, 16 November 1994, GATT BISD 41S, Vol. 1/32–33, which were consolidations of earlier practices.

14 Lanoszka, A., ‘The World Trade Organization Accession Process’ (2001) 35 (4)JWTL 575, at 584Google Scholar.

15 World Trade Organization, Technical Note on the Accession Process, 28 November 2005, WTO Doc. No. WT/ACC/10/Rev.3.

16 B. Hoekman and M. Kostecki, The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond (2001), at 66.

17 G. Curzon, Multilateral Commercial Diplomacy: The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and Its Impact on National Commercial Policies and Techniques (1965), at 36.

18 L. Haus, Globalizing GATT: The Soviet Union's Successor States, Eastern Europe and the International Trading System (1992), at 25–29.

19 A. Polouektov, The ‘Non-Market Economy’ Issue in International Trade in the Context of WTO Accessions, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Working Paper UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/MISC.20, (2002), at 12.

20 Accession of Hungary: Report of the Working Party, 20 July 1973, GATT Document L/3889, at 19.

21 Friman, H. R., ‘The Eisenhower Administration and the Demise of GATT: Dancing with Pandora’, (1994) AJES 53 (3), at 257Google Scholar. For a different perspective, see Komiya, R. and Itoh, M., ‘Japan's International Trade and Trade Policy, 1955–84’ in Inoguchi, T. and Okimoto, D. (eds.), The Political Economy of Japan, Vol. 2: The Changing International Context (1988), at 173Google Scholar.

22 Management of Accession Negotiations – Statement by the Chairman of the Council, 16 November 1994, GATT Document C/COM/4, BISD 41S, Vol1/32–3, at 1.

23 World Trade Organization, Protocols of Accession for New Members since 1995, including Commitments in Goods and Services, available online at <http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/completeacc_e.htm> (visited 28 April 2012) and Summary Table of Ongoing Accessions, available online at <http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/acc_e/status_e.htm> (visited 28 April 2012).

24 M. Kennett et al., Evaluating WTO Accessions: Legal and Economic Perspectives (2005).

25 Finger, J. M. and Schuler, P., ‘Implementation of the Uruguay Round Commitments: The Development Challenge’, (2000) 23 (4)World Economy 511, at 525CrossRefGoogle Scholar. This figure represented implementation of WTO obligations concerning customs reform, intellectual property, and sanitary and phytosanitary measures. These represent only a small proportion of the total commitments that a country is required to make. See also Finger, J. M., ‘Implementing the Uruguay Round Agreements: Problems for Developing Countries’, (2001) 24 (9)World Economy 1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 P. Capella, ‘WTO Gives Green Light To “Rising Star” Vietnam’, Vietnam Business News, 8 November 2006.

27 Zanzibar Declaration of the Meeting of the Ministers Responsible for Trade of the Least Developed Countries, 6 August 2001, WTO Doc. No. WT/L/409.

28 See, generally, Oxfam International, Make Extortion History – The Case for Development-Friendly WTO Accession for the World's Poorest Countries (2005), available online at <http://www.oxfam.org/en/policy/bp79-make-extortion-history> (visited 28 April 2012). See also, in relation to Vietnam, Oxfam International, Extortion at the Gate (2004), available online at <http://www.oxfam.org/en/policy/bp-041004-Viet-Nam> (visited 28 April 2012), in relation to Tonga, Oxfam International, Blood from a Stone (2005), available online at <http://www.oxfam.org/en/policy/bn051215-tonga-bloodfromastone> (visited 28 April 2012), and in relation to Afghanistan, Oxfam International, Getting the Fundamentals Right: The Early Stages of Afghanistan's WTO Accession Process (2007), available online at <www.oxfam.org/en/policy/briefingpapers/bp92_afghanistan_wto_accession_0706> (visited 28 April 2012).

29 United Nations Economic and Social Council, The Future WTO Agenda and Developing Countries – Studies in Trade and Investment No. 41 (2000), at 60 (2000).

30 World Trade Organization, Technical Note on the Accession Process, 28 November 2005, WTO Doc. No. WT/ACC/10/Rev.3, at 164–7.

31 Haas, P. M., ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, (1992) 46 (1)Intl Organization 1, at 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Ruggie, J. G., ‘International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends’, (1975) 29 (3)Intl Organization 557, at 570CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 See supra, note 33, at 2.

34 Drake, W. and Nicolaides, K., ‘Ideas, Interests and Institutionalization: “Trade in Services” and the Uruguay Round’, (1992) 46 (1)Intl Organization 36, at 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 S. K. Sell, Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights (2003), at 173–4; P. Drahos, ‘Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard Setting’, Commission on Intellectual Property Rights of the United Kingdom Working Paper 8 (2002).

36 Iedma, R., ‘Discourse Analysis’, in Clegg, S. R. and Bailey, J. R. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Organizational Studies (2008) 389, at 389Google Scholar.

37 M. Wetherell et al., Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader (2001), at 16.

38 Welcome Address by the Director-General to Viet Nam at the General Council Meeting of 7 November 2006, World Trade Organization Press Release, Geneva, 7 November 2006.

39 Quote from a 91-year-old Vietnamese man in Don Lee, ‘Eyeing WTO Membership, Vietnam Girds for Change’, Vietnam Business News, 21 August 2006. See also ‘Vietnam Hopes WTO Entry Will Turn It into “Little China”’, Khaleej Times, 5 November 2006.

40 Statement by M. Matsakis in Debate CRE 12/07/2007 – 11.3 of the European Parliament, 12 July 2007. In the US context, see D. R. Dillon and D. Markheim, ‘The Case for Permanent Normal Trading Relations with Vietnam’, available online at <www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/wm1152.cfm> (visited 28 April 2012): ‘And while no trade agreement, no matter how comprehensive, can itself install democracy or solve a country's human rights problems, trade agreements can force governments to enforce the rule of law . . . [W]ithout Vietnam's active pursuit of WTO membership, it would still be locked in North Korea-like despotism’.

41 General Council Approves Viet Nam's Membership, World Trade Organization Press Release No. 455, 7 November 2006.

42 Accession of Ukraine: Decision of the General Council of 5 February 2008, 13 February 2008, WTO Doc. No. WT/L/718; Report of the Working Party on the Accession of Ukraine to the World Trade Organization, 25 January 2008, WTO Doc. No. WT/ACC/UKR/152. The Report of the Working Party notes 63 commitments in para. 512.

43 F. Jawara and A. Kwa, Behind the Scenes at the WTO: The Real World of International Trade Negotiations (2003), at 202–11.

44 World Trade Organization, ‘Members and Accessions: Becoming a Member of the WTO’, available online at <www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min05_e/brief_e/brief20_e.htm> (visited 28 April 2012).

45 Viet Nam Joins WTO with Director-General's Tribute for True Grit, WTO Press Release, Geneva, 11 January 2007.

46 See the WTO archive of press releases concerning accession negotiations on the WTO website, available online at <www.wto.org/english/news_e/archive_e/acc_arc_e.htm> (visited 28 April 2012). See also Lamy: APEC Ministers Call for Rapid Restart of the Negotiating Engines, World Trade Organization Press Release, Geneva, 15 November 2006, quoting Director General Pascal Lamy: ‘I very much hope that the Russian side will now devote much needed attention to the multilateral part of its accession process which is still lagging behind’.

47 Viet Nam Starts Its ‘Quantum Jump’ but Still Some Way to Go, World Trade Organization Press Release, 12 December 2003.

48 Ibid.

49 M. Sidel, ‘Understanding Foreign Donor Support for Legal Reform in Socialist Transitional States: The Changing Nature and Continuing Dilemmas of Legal Reform Assistance in Vietnam’ (paper presented to the W. G. Hart Lecture at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 2003), at 5.

50 World Trade Organization, Trade Capacity Database, available online at <http://tcbdb.wto.org/> (visited 28 April 2012). It is difficult to obtain a clear overview of these projects in any detail, due in part to their sheer volume, and in part to the lack of detail contained in the database.

51 J. Wedel, Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe (1998), at 27 and 45–6.

52 Newton, S., ‘Post-Communist Legal Reform: The Elision of the Political’, in Hatchard, J. and Perry-Kessaris, A. (eds.), Law and Development: Facing Complexity in the 21st Century (2003), 161Google Scholar at 176.

53 United Nations Economic and Social Council Secretariat, Mainstreaming the Right to Development into International Trade Law and Policy at the World Trade Organization, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2004/17, at 11 (9 June 2004).

54 Interview carried out in Baku in 2005 with a local employee of a technical assistance project.

55 For a more detailed explanation of the BTA, see Toohey, L., ‘Stepping Stones and Stumbling Blocks: Vietnam's Regional Trade Arrangements and WTO Accession’, in Buckley, R.et al. (eds.), The Challenge to Globalization: Regional and Preferential Trade Agreements(2008) 65, at 77–8Google Scholar. In a number of instances, the BTA contained WTO-plus provisions, particularly in relation to intellectual property and investment.

56 United States Aid Agency, Data Sheet: Regional Development Mission-Asia (2005), available online at <http://www.usaid.gov/policy/budget/cbj2007/ane/pdf/rdma_486–002.pdf> (visited 14 April, 2008).

57 DAI, Vietnam – Support for Trade Acceleration Project, available online at <http://www.dai.com/work/project_detail.php?pid=55> (visited 11 June 2008).

58 Y. Dezalay and B. G. Garth, The Internationalization of the Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States (2002), at 198.

59 USVTC, Catalogue of Legal Updates, available online at <http://www.usvtc.org/updates/legal/> (visited 28 April 2012).

60 American Chamber of Commerce in Vietnam, Position Paper: Key Issues for WTO Accession, available online at <www.amchamvietnam.com/?id=582> (visited 28 April 2012). See also AmCham Letter to USTR Schwab and Commerce Secretary Gutierrez, 6 October 2006, available online at <http://www.amchamvietnam.com/1066> (visited 28 April 2012).

61 Report of the Working Party on the Accession of Viet Nam, 27 October 2006, WTO Doc. No. WT/ACC/VNM/48, 47.

62 Report of the Working Party on the Accession of Vietnam, 27 October 2006, WTO Doc. No. WT/ACC/VNM/48, 518.

63 Virgil, The Aeneid, Book VI, Trans. J. Dryden, open online source at <http://classics.mit.edu/Virgil/aeneid.6.vi.html> (visited 28 April 2012).

64 This is not to say that the issue has been completely ignored. For example, Jackson looks at the capacity of WTO players to bring a particular issue on to the negotiating table, and uses the term ‘mantras’ – see Jackson, J. H., ‘The WTO “Constitution” and Proposed Reforms: Seven “Mantras” Revisited’ (2001) 4 (1)JIEL 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Similarly Howse refers to the ‘metastructures’ of the WTO – see R. Howse, ‘Mainstreaming the Right to Development into International Trade Law and Policy’ (paper presented to the Yale Law School Law and Globalization Conference, 2004), subsequently reproduced as United Nations Economic and Social Council Secretariat, Mainstreaming the Right to Development into International Trade Law and Policy at the World Trade Organization, UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/2004/17 (9 June 2004).

65 Macrory, P. F.et al., ‘Institutional Framework’, in Macrory, P. F.et al. (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal Economic and Political Analysis (2005), 1 at 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 Ruggie, J., ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, in Krasner, S. (ed.), International Regimes (1983), 195Google Scholar.