Skip to main content
×
Home

Lichens on Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris – from tree bottom to the top

  • Liis MARMOR (a1), Tiiu TÕRRA (a1), Lauri SAAG (a1) (a2), Ede LEPPIK (a1) and Tiina RANDLANE (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract

The vertical gradient of the community structure of epiphytic lichens in forest canopies was studied in southern Estonian coniferous forests. All lichen species on 15 Norway spruces and 15 Scots pines were recorded; age of trees ≥100 years. Species were sampled in height ranges on entire trees from the bottom to the top. The number of lichen species on pine trunks decreased with height from the ground, whereas the number of species on branches increased. There was no significant vertical change in the number of lichen species on spruce trunks; number of species on spruce branches was highest in mid canopy. The mean number of lichen species on a tree was 41 in spruces and 34 in pines; the mean number of species on the first 2 m was 14 in spruces and 12 in pines. According to the results, about two thirds of a tree's lichen species remain unrecorded if only the first 2 m near the ground are surveyed. Many lichen species were found only higher than 2 m, including several common species (e.g. Buellia griseovirens, Lecanora pulicaris, and Melanohalea exasperatula), but also some locally rather rare (Fellhanera subtilis, Micarea nitschkeana, Rinodina efflorescens) or red-listed ones (Evernia mesomorpha, Usnea barbata, U. fulvoreagens, U. substerilis, U. wasmuthii) and one new species for Estonia, Lecanora farinaria. There were also some species, such as Chaenotheca stemonea, Cladonia cenotea and C. norvegica, that were restricted to the lowest 2 m. The results indicate that canopy lichens form a significant part of lichen diversity in coniferous forests, and could add valuable information when estimating forest lichen diversity for conservation and other purposes.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Ahti T., Hämet-Ahti L. & Jalas J. (1968) Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Annales Botanici Fennici 5: 169211.
Campbell J. & Coxson D. S. (2001) Canopy microclimate and arboreal lichen loading in subalpine spruce-fir forest. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 537555.
Caruso A. & Thor G. (2007) Importance of different tree fractions for epiphytic lichen diversity on Picea abies and Populus tremula in mature managed boreonemoral Swedish forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 22: 219230.
Coppins A. M. & Coppins B. J. (2002) Indices of Ecological Continuity for Woodland Epiphytic Lichen Habitats in the British Isles. London: British Lichen Society.
eElurikkus (Database of Estonian Biodiversity). http://elurikkus.ut.ee.
Ellyson W. J. T. & Sillet S. C. (2003) Epiphyte communities on Sitka spruce in an old-growth redwood forest. Bryology and Lichenology 106: 197211.
EMHI (Estonian Meterological and Hydrological Institute). http://www.emhi.ee.
eSamba (Database of Estonian Lichens). http://www.eseis.ut.ee.
Fritz Ö. (2009) Vertical distribution of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens emphasizes the importance of old beeches in conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 289304.
Fritz Ö., Gustafsson L. & Larsson K. (2008) Does forest continuity matter in conservation? – A study of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes in beech forests of southern Sweden. Biological Conservation 141: 655668.
Fritz Ö., Niklasson M. & Churski M. (2009) Tree age is a key factor for the conservation of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes in beech forests. Applied Vegetation Science 12: 93106.
Gauslaa Y., Lie M. & Ohlson M. (2008) Epiphytic lichen biomass in a boreal Norway spruce forest. Lichenologist 40: 257266.
Gross G. (1993) Numerical Simulation of Canopy Flows. Berlin: Springer.
Holien H. (1997) The lichen flora on Picea abies in a suboceanic spruce forest area in Central Norway with emphasis on the relationship to site and stand parameters. Nordic Journal of Botany 17: 5576.
Jarman S. J. & Kantvilas G. (1995) Epiphytes on an old Huon pine tree (Lagarostrobos franklinii) in Tasmanian rainforest. New Zealand Journal of Botany 33: 6578.
Josefsson T., Hellberg E. & Östlund L. (2005) Influence of habitat history on the distribution of Usnea longissima in boreal Scandinavia: a methodological case study. Lichenologist 37: 555567.
Jüriado I., Paal J. & Liira J. (2003) Epiphytic and epixylic lichen species diversity in Estonian natural forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 15871607.
Kermit T. & Gauslaa Y. (2001) The vertical gradient of bark pH of twigs and macrolichens in a Picea abies canopy not affected by acid rain. Lichenologist 33: 353359.
Laasimer L. & Masing V. (1995). Taimestik ja taimkate [Flora and plant cover]. In Eesti Loodus [Estonian Nature] (Raukas A., ed.): 364401. Tallinn: Valgus & Eesti Entsüklopeediakirjastus.
Lie M. H., Arup U., Grytnes J.-A. & Ohlson M. (2009) The importance of host tree age, size and growth rate as determinants of epiphytic lichen diversity in boreal spruce forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 35793596.
Marmor L., Tõrra T. & Randlane T. (2010) The vertical gradient of bark pH and epiphytic macrolichen biota in relation to alkaline air pollution. Ecological Indicators 6: 11371143.
Marmor L., Tõrra T., Saag L. & Randlane T. (2011) Effects of forest continuity and tree age on epiphytic lichen biota in coniferous forests in Estonia. Ecological Indicators 11: 12701276.
McCune B. (1993) Gradients in epiphyte biomass in three Pseudotsuga-Tsuga forests of different ages in Western Oregon and Washington. Bryologist 96: 405411.
McCune B., Rosentreter R., Ponzetti J. M. & Shaw D. C. (2000) Epiphyte habitats in an old conifer forest in Western Washington, U.S.A. Bryologist 103: 417427.
Nascimbene J., Marini L., Motta R. & Nimis P. L. (2009) Influence of tree age, tree size and crown structure on lichen communities in mature Alpine spruce forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 15091522.
Orange A., James P. W. & White F. J. (2001) Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens. London: British Lichen Society.
Randlane T., Jüriado I., Suija A., Lõhmus P. & Leppik E. (2008) Lichens in the new Red List of Estonia. Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 44: 113120.
Randlane T., Saag A. & Suija A. (2011) Lichenized, lichenicolous and allied fungi of Estonia. Ver. November 1, 2011. http://esamba.bo.bg.ut.ee/checklist/est/home.php.
Ranius T., Johansson P., Berg N. & Niklasson M. (2008) The influence of tree age and microhabitat quality on the occurrence of crustose lichens associated with old oaks. Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 653662.
Rosso A. L., McCune B. & Rambo T. R. (2000) Ecology and conservation of a rare, old-growth-associated canopy lichen in a silvicultural landscape. Bryologist 103: 117127.
Sillet S. C. & Antoine M. E. (2004) Lichens and bryophytes in forest canopies. In Forest Canopies (Lowman M. D. & Rinker H. B., eds): 151174. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Williams C. B. & Sillett S. C. (2007) Epiphyte communities on redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) in northwestern California. Bryologist 110: 420452.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Lichenologist
  • ISSN: 0024-2829
  • EISSN: 1096-1135
  • URL: /core/journals/lichenologist
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 26 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 140 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.