Skip to main content
×
×
Home

THE DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF ENDOGENOUS GROWTH MODELS

  • Norman Sedgley (a1) and Bruce Elmslie (a2)
Abstract

This paper explores the dynamics of semiendogenous versus fully endogenous growth models in “lab equipment” specifications of the models with expanding sectors. Capital is allowed to accumulate and is used, together with other inputs, to produce new knowledge. The stability of the steady state path is found to be determined by the inequality and/or knife-edge restrictions needed to produce steady state growth. This paper takes the ratio of the shadow price of capital to knowledge and the level of consumption as jump variables. Semiendogenous growth models lead to a 4 × 4 dynamic system where the sign of the coefficient matrix of the log linearized dynamic system is indefinite, leading to a potential for both stable and unstable equilibria. The knife-edge restrictions needed to generate policy influences on growth are shown to be restrictions that reduce the system to 3 × 3 with a positive definite coefficient matrix, thereby guaranteeing a globally stable equilibrium. Implications for empirical testing are addressed.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence to: Norman Sedgley, Department of Economics, Sellinger School of Business and Management, Loyola University in Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA; e-mail: nsedgley@loyola.edu.
References
Hide All
Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60 (2), 323351.
Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter (1998) Endogenous Growth Theory. London: MIT Press.
Boskin, Michael and Lau, Lawrence (2000) Generalized Solow neutral technical progress and postwar economic growth. NBER working paper 8023.
Dalgaard, Carl-Johan and Kreiner, Claus Thustrup (2001) Is declining productivity inevitable? Journal of Economic Growth 6 (3), 187203.
Dinopoulos, Elias and Thompson, Peter (1998) Schumpeterian growth without scale effects. Journal of Economic Growth 3 (4), 313335.
Eicher, Theo and Turnovsky, Stephen (1999) Non-scale models of economic growth. Economic Journal 109 (July), 394415.
Eicher, Theo and Turnovsky, Stephen (2001) Transitional dynamics in a two-sector nonscale growth model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25, 85113.
Giordani, Paolo and Luca, Zamparelli (2008) The importance of industrial policy in quality-ladder growth models. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics: Topics in Macroeconomics 8, 1.
Grossman, Gene and Helpman, Elhanan (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ha, Joonyung and Howitt, Peter (2007) Accounting for trends in productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian critique of semi-endogenous growth theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39 (4), 733774.
Hall, Robert and Jones, Charles (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (1), 83116.
Jones, Charles (1995a) R&D based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103, 759784.
Jones, Charles (1995b) Time series tests of endogenous growth models. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 495525.
Jones, Charles (1999) Growth: With or without scale effects? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 89 (2), 139144.
Jones, Charles (2001) Was the industrial revolution inevitable? Economic growth over the very long run. BEP Advances in Macroeconomics 2, 1.
Jones, Charles (2002) Sources of US economic growth in a world of ideas. American Economic Review 92 (1), 220239.
Jones, Charles (2003) Population and ideas: A theory of endogenous growth. In Aghion, Philippe, Frydman, Roman, Stiglitz, Joseph, and Woodford, Michael (eds.), Knowledge, Information, and Expectations in Modern Macroeconomics: In Honor of Edmund S. Phelps. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jones, Charles and Williams, John (2000) To much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. Journal of Economic Growth 5, 6585.
Kortum, Samuel (1997) Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrica 65, 6, 13891419.
Li, Chol-Won (2001) On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. Economic Journal 111, 164179.
Madsen, Jakob (2008) Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: Testing the knowledge production function using international data. Journal of Economics Growth 3 (1), 126.
Peretto, Pietro (1998) Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth 3 (4), 283311.
Romer, Paul (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98, S71102.
Sedgley, Norman and Elmslie, Bruce (2010) Reinterpreting the Jones critique: A time series approach to testing and understanding idea driven growth models with transitional dynamics. Journal of Macroeconomics 32 (9), 103–17.
Segerstrom, Paul (1998) Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review 88 (5), 12901310.
Segerstrom, Paul (2000) The long run growth effects of R&D subsidies. Journal of Economic Growth 5(September), 277305.
Young, Alwyn (1998) Growth without scale effects. Journal of Political Economy 106 (1), 4163.
Zachariadis, Marios (2003) R&D, innovation, and technological progress: A test of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects. Canadian Journal of Economics 36 (3), 566586.
Zachariadis, Marios (2004) R&D-induced growth in the OECD? Review of Development Economics 8 (3), 423439.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Macroeconomic Dynamics
  • ISSN: 1365-1005
  • EISSN: 1469-8056
  • URL: /core/journals/macroeconomic-dynamics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 42 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 249 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 13th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.