Skip to main content
×
Home

Entrepreneurs and Social Capital in China

  • Olav Sorenson (a1)
Abstract

Does social capital operate differently in China? A long and vibrant literature on the concept of guanxi suggests not only that social capital might have a different character in China but also that it might prove more valuable there to employees and entrepreneurs alike. Drawing on unusually high quality data on Chinese executives, Burt and Burzynska (2017) explore the question of whether the same structural configurations of relationships appear associated with success in China as have been found in the West. Their short answer is yes. As in the West, the founders and managers of larger companies have relationships characterized by a larger proportion of ‘structural holes’ – where the focal individual represents the only connection between his or her contacts (in other words, a brokering relationship). Closure – having multiple ties in common with another individual – meanwhile appears to foster trust, just as it does elsewhere. One could therefore view the results as strong evidence for the universality of a structural approach to social capital, one based on the patterns of relationships between individuals (e.g., Burt, 1992; Coleman, 1988; Podolny, 1993).

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Entrepreneurs and Social Capital in China
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Entrepreneurs and Social Capital in China
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Entrepreneurs and Social Capital in China
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Aven B., & Hillman H. forthcoming. Structural role complementarity in entrepreneurial teams. Management Science.
Batjargal B. 2007. Network triads: Transitivity, referral and venture capital decisions in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 9981012.
Batjargal B., & Liu M. 2004. Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science, 15 (2): 159172.
Burt R. S. 1992. Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt R. S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110 (2): 349399.
Burt R. S., & Burzynska K. 2017. Chinese entrepreneurs, social networks, and guanxi . Management and Organization Review, 13 (2): doi:10.1017/mor2017.6.
Coleman J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95–S120.
Dahl M. S., & Sorenson O. 2012. Home sweet home? Entrepreneurs’ location choices and the performance of their ventures. Management Science, 58 (6): 10591071.
Løvas B., & Sorenson O. 2008. The mobilization of scarce resources. Advances in Strategic Management, 25: 361389.
Luo J.-D. 2011. Guanxi revisited: An exploratory study of familiar ties in a Chinese workplace. Management and Organization Review, 7 (2): 329351.
Luo J.-D., & Cheng M.-Y. 2015. Guanxi circles’ effect on organizational trust: Bringing power and vertical social exchanges into intraorganizational network analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 59 (8): 10241037.
Manski C. F. 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60 (3): 531542.
Podolny J. M. 1993. A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98 (4): 829872.
Renzulli L. A., Aldrich H., & Moody J. 2000. Family matters: Gender, networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes. Social Forces, 79 (2): 523546.
Ruef M. 2010. The Entrepreneurial Group. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ryall M. D., & Sorenson O. 2007. Brokers and competitive advantage. Management Science, 53 (4): 566583.
Shane S., & Stuart T. E. 2002. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48 (1): 154170.
Simmel G. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel, chapter The Triad: 145169. New York: Free Press.
Stuart T. E., & Sorenson O. 2007. Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1: 211227.
Wuebker R., Hampl N., & Wüstenhagen R. 2015. The strength of strong ties in an emerging industry: Experimental evidence of the effects of status hierarchies and personal ties in venture capitalist decision making. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9 (2): 167187.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Management and Organization Review
  • ISSN: 1740-8776
  • EISSN: 1740-8784
  • URL: /core/journals/management-and-organization-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 36
Total number of PDF views: 557 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 805 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 9th May 2017 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.