Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:53:19.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Application of the Electron Lens to Cloud Chamber Photography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

W. T. Davies  and
C. O'Ceallaigh
W. T. Davies
Affiliation:
Selwyn College
C. O'Ceallaigh
Affiliation:
Trinity College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the course of a cloud chamber investigation of the occurrence of rare events accompanying the passage of fast β-particles through matter, it was found* that existing methods of introducing high-energy electrons into the chamber were unsatisfactory. Electrons of sufficiently high energy could only be obtained from sources which emit, in addition, a large amount of γ-radiation. Absorption of this γ-radiation in the walls and gas of the chamber resulted in the ejection of numbers of stray electrons, whose presence rendered the observation of the fast β-ray tracks a matter of some difficulty.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , October 1937 , pp. 540 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* By one of us (W. T. D.) with the collaboration of M. A. Fromageot.

† Ho, P. C., Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31 (1934), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‡ Terroux, and Alexander, , Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 28 (1931), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

§ While this work was in progress a description was given by Staub (Helv. Phys. Acta, 9 (1936), 306–16Google Scholar) of a solenoidal electron lens used in conjunction with a Wilson chamber. Many of the considerations studied hereafter do not apply to his arrangement.

∥ Klemperer, , Phil. Mag. 20 (1936), 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* Busch, , Arch. Elektrotechnik, 18 (1927), 583CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Henriot, , Revue, d'optique, 14 (1935), 146.Google Scholar

* The focused electrons were assumed to have energies distributed between 1 and 2·5 M.V. An energy equivalent to Hp = 7000 is a rough mean value.

* Since the beam of electrons has a width of several cm. φ will vary appreciably (~ 20°) from one edge of the beam to the other.

* The focal length could not be decreased sufficiently, and it was inconvenient to lengthen the tube. A larger object distance would result in the permissible divergence being exceeded.