Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:45:20.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE SPECIES GROUPS OF GONATOCERUS NEES IN NORTH AMERICA WITH A REVISION OF THE SULPHURIPES AND ATER GROUPS (HYMENOPTERA: MYMARIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

John T. Huber
Get access

Abstract

A provisional cladistic analysis of the species groups of Gonatocerus Nees is presented, based on 24 characters. Six species groups are defined, but only the four Nearctic ones are described. The species groups proposed are the ater, deficiens, litoralis, membraciphagus, straeleni, and sulphuripes groups. The ater group is divided into the morrilli, ater (s.s.), and bucculentus subgroups. Keys are provided to distinguish the species groups, and females of the sulphuripes- and ater-group species. Twenty-four species are recognized in the sulphuripes and ater groups for America north of Mexico. Eight species are recognized in the sulphuripes group, of which californicus, koebelei, maga, mexicanus, rivalis, and utahensis are redescribed. Two species, floridensis and lissonotus, are described as new. One new synonymy is proposed: titillatus is considered a junior synonym of utahensis. Sixteen species are recognized in the ater group, of which ashmeadi, capitatus, dolichocerus, fasciatus, latipennis, morrilli, novifasciatus, ovicenatus, and triguttatus are redescribed. Seven species, bucculentus, enicmophilus, flagellatus, impar, incomptus, inexpectatus, and inflatiscapus, are described as new. Two new synonymies are proposed: maximus is considered a junior synonym of latipennis, and marilandicus a junior synonym of dolichocerus. Lectotypes are designated for ashmeadi, capitatus, koebelei, mexicanus, morrilli, ovicenatus, triguttatus, and utahensis.

Résumé

Une analyse cladistique provisoire des groupes d'espèces du genre Gonatocerus Nees est présentée, basée sur 24 caractères. Les groupes proposés sont les suivants : ater, deficiens, litoralis, membraciphagus, straeleni, et sulphuripes. Le group ater est divisé en trois sous-groupes : morrilli, ater (s.s.), et bucculentus. Des clés sont données pour séparer aux espèces les femelles des groupes sulphuripes et ater. Les groupes sulphuripes et ater du genre Gonatocerus sont révisés pour l'Amérique du Nord. Vingt-quatre espèces sont reconnues dans ces deux groupes. Dans le groupe sulphuripes huit espèces sont reconnues. Six, californicus, koebelei, maga, mexicanus, rivalis, et utahensis sont redécrites. Deux, floridensis et lissonotus, sont nouvelles. Je considère titillatus comme synonyme nouvelle de utahensis. Dans le group ater seize espèces sont reconnues. Neuf, ashmeadi, capitatus, dolichocerus, fasciatus, latipennis, morrilli, novifasciatus, ovicenatus, et triguttatus sont redécrites. Je considère maximus et marilandicus, respectivement, comme synonymes nouvelles de latipennis et dolichocerus. Des léctotypes sont désignés pour ashmeadi, capitatus, koebelei, mexicanus, morrilli, ovicenatus, triguttatus, et utahensis.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 120 , Supplement S141 , 1988 , pp. 3 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alayo, D. 1970. Catálogo de los Himenópteros de Cuba. Instituto Cubana del Libro, L. Habana. 218 pp.Google Scholar
Alayo, D., and Hernández, L.R.. 1978. Introducción al estudio de los himenópteros de Cuba. Superfamilia Chalcidoidea. Dirección de Publicaciones de la A.C. La Habana. 105 pp.Google Scholar
Annecke, D.P., and Doutt, R.L.. 1961. The genera of the Mymaridae. Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea. Ent. Mem. Dep. agric. tech. Serv. Repub. S. Afr. 5: 1–71.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1916. Liste neuerdings beschriebener oder gezogener Parasiten und ihrer Wirte. V. Fortsetzung. Societas ent. 31: 50.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1887. Studies on the North American Proctotrupidae, with descriptions of new species from Florida. (Paper No. 3). Can. Ent. 19: 192–198.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1982. Oriental chalcid wasps of the genus Epitranus. J. nat. Hist. 16: 577–622.Google Scholar
Bouček, Z., and Graham, M.W.R. de V.. 1972. The identity of the type-species of Gonatocerus Nees (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). J. Ent. (B) 41: 125–130.Google Scholar
Bruner, S.C., Scaramuzza, L.C., and Otero, A.R.. 1975. Catàlogo de los insectos que atacan a las plantas economicas de Cuba, Secunda Edición. Academia de Ciencias de Cuba, L. Habana. 400 pp.Google Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1958. Superfamily Chalcidoidea. pp. 62–84in Krombein, K. V. (Ed.), Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog. U.S. D. A. Agric. Monogr. 2 (First Suppl.). 305 pp.Google Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1979. Family Mymaridae. pp. 1022–1033in Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D. Jr., Smith, D.R., and Burks, B.D. (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico, Vol. 1. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 1198 pp.Google Scholar
Crawford, J.C. 1915. Descriptions of new Hymenoptera, No. 9. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 48: 577–586.Google Scholar
Dalla Torre, C.G. 1898. Subfam. Mymarinae. pp. 422–431in Catalogus Hymenopterorum Hucusque Descriptorum Systematicus et Synonymicus 5. Chalcididae et Proctotrupidae. Leipzig. 598 pp.Google Scholar
Debauche, H.R. 1948. Etude sur les Mymarommidae et les Mymaridae de la Belgique (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea). Mém. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg. 108: 1–248.Google Scholar
Debauche, H.R. 1949. Mymaridae (Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea). Explor. Parc natn. Albert Miss. De Witte 49: 1–105.Google Scholar
DeLong, D.M. 1965. Ecological aspects of North American leafhoppers and their role in agriculture. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 11: 9–26.Google Scholar
De Santis, L. 1967. Catálogo de los himenópteros argentinos de la serie Parasítica, incluyendo Bethyloidea. Mems Comn Invest, cient., La Plata. 337 pp.Google Scholar
De Santis, L. 1979. Catàlogo de los himenópteros chalcidoideos de America al sur de los Estados Unidos. Publicación especial. Mems Comn Invest, cient., La Plata. 488 pp.Google Scholar
De Santis, L. 1980. Catálogo de los himenópteros brasileños de la serie Parasítica; incluyendo Bethyloidea. Ed. Univ. Fed. Paraná, Curitiba. 395 pp.Google Scholar
Dickerson, E.L., and Weiss, H.B.. 1917. ldiocerus scurra Germar, a poplar leaf hopper. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 25: 218–224.Google Scholar
Enock, F. 1909. New genera of British Mymaridae (Haliday). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 1909: 449–459.Google Scholar
Essig, E.O. 1926. Insects of Western North America. MacMillan Co., New York. 1035 pp.Google Scholar
Fattig, P.W. 1955. The Cicadellidae or leaf hoppers of Georgia. Emory Univ. Mus. Bull. 11. 68 pp.Google Scholar
Förster, A. 1841. Beiträge zur Monographie der Pteromalinen Nees. Aachen. 46 pp.Google Scholar
Förster, A. 1847. Ueber die Familie der Mymariden. Linn. Ent. 2: 195–233.Google Scholar
Förster, A. 1856. Hymenopterologische Studien II. Heft. Chalcidiae und Proctotrupii. Aachen. 152 pp.Google Scholar
Frison, T.H. 1927. A list of the insect types in the collections of the Illinois State Natural History Survey and the University of Illinois. Bull. I.I. St. nat. Hist. Surv. 16: 137–309.Google Scholar
Ganan, A.B. 1913. New Hymenoptera from North America. Proc. U.S. nain. Mus. 46: 431–443.Google Scholar
Ganan, A.B. 1932. Miscellaneous descriptions and notes on parasitic Hymenoptera. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 25: 736–757.Google Scholar
Gahan, A.B., Crosby, C.R., and Leonard, M.D.. 1928. Superfamily Chalcidoidea. pp. 975–985in Leonard, M.D. (Ed.), A List of the Insects of New York with a List of the Spiders and Certain Other Allied Groups. Mem. N.Y. agric. Exp. Stn. 101. 1121 pp.Google Scholar
Gahan, A.B., and Fagan, M.M.. 1923. The type species of the genera of Chalcidoidea or chalcid-flies. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 124. 173 pp.Google Scholar
Gibson, E.H. 1915. The sharp-headed grain leafhopper. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 254. 16 pp.Google Scholar
Gibson, G.A.P. 1985. Some pro- and mesothoracic structures important for phylogenetic analysis of Hymenoptera, with a review of terms used for the structures. Can. Ent. 117: 1395–1443.Google Scholar
Gibson, G.A.P. 1986. Evidence for monophyly and relationships of Chalcidoidea, Mymaridae, and Mymarommatidae (Hymenoptera: Terebrantes). Can. Ent. 118: 205–240.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1905. Descriptions of two new hymenopterous egg-parasites. Ent. News 16: 287–289.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1910. Synonymic and descriptive notes on the chalcidoid family Mymaridae. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 18: 233–259.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1911 a. Hosts of insect egg-parasites in North and South America. II. Psyche 18: 146–153.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1911 b. Descriptions of North American Mymaridae with synonymic and other notes on described genera and species. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 37: 253–324.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1911 c. The occurrence of the mymarid genus Stethynium Enock in West Australia. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 13: 120–123.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1912. Australian Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea—II. The family Mymaridae with description of new species. Mem. Qd Mus. 1: 117–175.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1913 a. Critical notes on some species of Mymaridae from the Sandwich (Hawaiian) Islands, with comparative notes on Australian, North American, and European forms (Hymenoptera; Chalcidoidea). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 15: 9–20.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1913 b. A second new genus of chalcidoid Hymenoptera of the family Mymaridae from Australia. Can. Ent. 45: 276.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1913 c. Additions to the Mymaridae and Trichogrammatidae of Australia. Entomologist 46: 255–259.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1913 d. The occurrence of the mymarid genus Cosmocomoidea Howard in Australia (Hymenoptera). Can. Ent. 45: 327–328.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1915. Notes on North American Mymaridae and Trichogrammatidae (Hym.). Ent. New: 27: 4–8.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1916 a. New miscellaneous chalcidoid Hymenoptera with notes on described species. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 9: 291–308.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1916 b. New species of parasitic Hymenoptera. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. (N.S.) 11: 111–113.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1917 a. Descriptions of miscellaneous chalcid-flies. Insecutor Inscit. menstr. 4: 109–121.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1917 b. Descriptiones Hymenopterorum Chalcidoidicorum cum observationibus. IV. Entomologist 50: 36–38.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1917 c. Descriptiones stellarum novarum. Privately printed. 22 pp.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1917 d. Notes and descriptions of miscellaneous chalcid-flies (Hymenoptera). Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 53: 445–150.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1917 e. New chalcid flies, with notes. Bull. Brooklyn Ent. Soc. (N.S.) 12: 86–89.Google Scholar
Girault, A.A. 1929. North American Hymenoptera Mymaridae. Addendum ‘New insects mostly Australian’, pp. 28–29. Privately printed.Google Scholar
Gordh, G., and Hall, J.C.. 1979. A critical point dryer used as a method of mounting insects from alcohol. Ent. News 90: 57–59.Google Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1969. The Pteromalidae of northwestern Europe (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Ent. Suppl.) 16: 1–980.Google Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1972. The identity of Lymaenon acuminatus Walker, type-species of the genus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). J. Ent. (B) 41: 131–132.Google Scholar
Graham, M.W.R. de V. 1982. The Haliday collection of Mymaridae (Insecta, Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) with taxonomic notes on some material in other collections. Proc. R. Ir. Acad., B 82: 189–243.Google Scholar
Haliday, A.H. 1833. An essay on the classification of the parasitic Hymenoptera of Britain, which correspond with the Ichneumones minuti of Linnaeus. Ent. Mag. 1: 259–276, 333–350.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K.G.A. 1983. Introduced and native leafhoppers common to the old and new worlds (Rhynchota: Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Can. Ent. 115: 473–511.Google Scholar
Hedqvist, K.J. 1960. Hymenoptera (Chalcidoidea) Mymaridae. S. Afr. Anim. Life 7: 424–433.Google Scholar
Heppner, J.B., and Lamas, G.. 1982. Acronyms for world museum collections of insects, with an emphasis on Neotropical Lepidoptera. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 28: 305–315.Google Scholar
Hoebeke, E.R. 1980. Catalogue of the Hymenoptera types in the Cornell University insect collection. Part I: Symphyta and Apocrifa (Parasitica). Search: Agriculture. Cornell Univ. agric. Exp. Stn. 9. 36 pp.Google Scholar
Hoelscher, C.E. 1966. A leafhopper, Ollarianus strictus (Cicadellidae) and a hymenopterous parasite, Lymaenon marylandicus (Mymaridae), reared from Texas citrus. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 820–823.Google Scholar
Holloway, T.E., and Loftin, U.C.L.. 1919. Insects attacking sugar cane in the United States. J. econ. Ent. 12: 448–150.Google Scholar
Howard, L.O. 1908. A new genus and species of Mymaridae. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 10: 68–70.Google Scholar
Howard, L.O., andAshmead, W.H.. 1896. On some reared parasitic hymenopterous insects from Ceylon. Proc. U.S. nam. Mus. 18: 633–648.Google Scholar
Huber, J.T. 1986. Systematics, biology, and hosts of the Mymaridae and Mymarommatidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera): 1758–1984. Entomography 4: 185–243.Google Scholar
Huber, J.T. 1987. Review of Schizophragma Ogloblin and the non-Australian species of Stethynium Enock (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). Can. Ent. 119: 823–855.Google Scholar
Johnson, N.F. 1984. Systematics of Nearctic Telenomus: classification and revisions of the podisi and phymatae species groups (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Bull. Ohio Biol. surv. New Series 6: 1–113.Google Scholar
King, P.E., and Copland, M.J.W.. 1969. The structure of the female reproductive system in the Mymaridae (Chalcidoidea: Hymenoptera). J. nat. Hist. 3: 349–365.Google Scholar
Kryger, J.P. 1934. Synonymic remarks on some generic names of Mymaridae (Hym.). Ent. Meddr 18: 503–508.Google Scholar
Kryger, J.P. 1950. The European Mymaridae comprising the genera known up to c. 1930. Ent. Meddr 26: 1–97.Google Scholar
Kuwayama, S. 1935. Studies on Lema oryzae Kuwayama, the rice leaf-beetle. Part IV—observations on the biology and liberation of an egg-parasite, Anaphes nipponicus Kuwayama. Rep. Hokkaido natn. agric. Exp. Stn. 33: 1–80. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Leonard, M.D., and Crosby, C.R.. 1915. A new species of Gonatocerus (Mymaridae) parasitic on the eggs of a new species of Idiocerus (Bythoscopidae) feeding on poplar. J. econ. Ent. 8: 541–547.Google Scholar
Mani, M.S., and Saraswat, G.G.. 1973. Family Gonatoceridae. pp. 78–125in Mani, M.S., Dubey, O.P., Kaul, B.K., and Saraswat, G.G. (Eds.), On Some Chalcidoidea from India. Mem. Sch. Ent. St. John's Coll. 2: 1–128.Google Scholar
Martin, J.E.H. 1977. The insects and arachnids of Canada. Part 1. Collecting, preparing, and preserving insects, mites, and spiders. Publication 1643. Printing and Publishing Supply and Services Canada, Hull. 182 pp.Google Scholar
Mathot, G. 1969. Contribution à la connaissance des Mymaridae d'Europe et description d'espèces nouvelles (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Bull. Inst. r. Sci. nat. Belg. 45: 1–23.Google Scholar
Matthews, M.J. 1986. The British species of Gonatocerus Nees (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), egg parasitoids of Homoptera. Syst. Ent. 11: 213–229.Google Scholar
Michener, C.D. 1944. Comparative external morphology, phylogeny, and a classification of the bees (Hymenoptera). Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 82: 157–326.Google Scholar
Miura, T. 1979. On the longevity and parasitic activity of adult Gonatocerus sp. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). Bull. Fac. Agric. Shimame Univ. 13: 156–162.Google Scholar
Moratorio, M.S. 1977. Aspects of the biology of Anagrus spp. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), with special reference to host-parasitoid relationships. Ph.D. thesis, University of London. 183 pp.Google Scholar
Narayanan, E. S. 1961. New record and descriptions of new species of parasites of San Jose scale. Proc. natn. Inst. Sci. India 26B (Suppl.): 20–29.Google Scholar
Narayanan, E.S., and Rao, B.R. Subba. 1961. Studies on Indian Mymaridae III (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Beitr. Ent. 11: 655–671.Google Scholar
Neesab Esenbeck, C.G. 1834. Hymenopterorum Ichneumonibus affinium monographiae, genera europaea et species illustrantes. 2. Stuttgart & Tubingen. 448 pp.Google Scholar
Noyes, J.S. 1980. A review of the genera of Neotropical Encyrtidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. Ent. Series 41: 1–253.Google Scholar
Noyes, J.S. 1982. Collecting and preserving chalcid wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). J. nat. Hist. 16: 315–334.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A.A. 1935. Especies nuevas o poco conocidas del gènero Gonatocerus (Hym. Mymaridae) de la República Argent. Revta Soc. ent. argent. 7: 65–78.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A.A. 1936. Las especies nuevas o poco conocidas del gènero Lymaenon (Hal.) Walk. (Gonatocerus (1) auct. nec Nees) de la República Argentina (Hym. Mymaridae). Revta Soc. ent. argent. 8: 33–56.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A.A. 1938. Especias nuevas del subgénero Gastrogonatocerus Ogloblin (Género Lymaenon, Mymaridae Hym.). Revta Ent., Rio de J. 8: 93–106.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A.A. 1939. Las especies nuevas o poco conocidas del género Lymaenon (Hal.) Mymaridae, (Hym.). Revta Soc. ent. argent. 10: 239–248.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A.A. 1946. Descriptions of new genera and species of Mymaridae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Iowa St. Coll. J. Sci. 20: 277–295.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A.A. 1955. Las especies nuevas o poco conocidas del gènero Lymaenon (Haliday) (Mymaridae, Hymenoptera). Revta Soc. ent. argent. 18: 17–22.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A.A. 1959 a. Especies nuevas del género “Lymaenon” Hal. (Mymaridae, Hymenoptera). Acta zool. lilloana 17: 185–195.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A.A. 1959 b. Primera nota sobre los mimarides de la República Ecuador (Mymaridae, Hymenopt.). Mitt. münch. ent. Ges. 49: 43–62.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A.A. 1960. La estructura cefálica de los representantes de la familia Mymaridae (Hymenoptera). pp. 109–115in Actas y trabajos del primer congreso Sudamericano de zoologia (La Plata, 12–14 octubre 1959). Section 4 — Entomologia. 276 pp.Google Scholar
Peck, O. 1951. Superfamily Chalcidoidea. pp. 410–594in Muesebeck, C.F.W., Krombein, K.V., and Townes, H.K. (Eds.), Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic Catalog. U.S. D. A. Agric. Monogr. 2. 1420 pp.Google Scholar
Peck, O. 1963. A catalogue of the Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Can. Ent. Suppl. 30: 1–1092.Google Scholar
Perkins, R.C.L. 1912. Parasites of insects attacking sugar cane. Hawaii. Sugar Plant. Assoc. Exp. Stn. Rep. Ent. Ser. Bull. 10. 27 pp.Google Scholar
Richards, O.W. 1977. Hymenoptera. Introduction and key to families. Handbk. Ident. Br. Insects Vol. VI, Pt. 1. 100 pp.Google Scholar
Sahad, K.A. 1982 a. Biology and morphology of Gonatocerus sp. (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), an egg parasitoid of the green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps Uhler (Homoptera, Deltocephalidae). I. Biology. Kontyû 50: 246–260.Google Scholar
Sahad, K.A. 1982 b. Biology and morphology of Gonatocerus sp. (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae), an egg parasitoid of the green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps Uhler (Homoptera, Deltocephalidae). II. Morphology. Kontyû 50: 467–476.Google Scholar
Sahad, K.A. 1982 c. Descriptions of new species of Gonatocerus Nees and Anagrus Haliday from Japan (Hymen optera, Mymaridae). Esakia 19: 191–204.Google Scholar
Sahad, K. A., and Hirashima, Y.. 1984. Taxonomic studies on the genera Gonatocerus Nees and Anagrus Haliday of Japan and adjacent regions, with notes on their biology (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae). Bull. Inst. trop. Agric. Kyushu Univ. 7: 1–78.Google Scholar
Schauff, M.E. 1984. The holarctic genera of Mymaridae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Mem. ent. Soc. Wash. 12. 67 pp.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R.E. 1935. Principles of Insect Morphology. McGraw-Hill, New York. 667 pp.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R.E. 1960. Some words and their ways in entomology. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 62: 265–270.Google Scholar
Soyka, W. 1946. Revision einiger Mymaridengattungen. Zentbl. Gesamtgeb. Ent. 1: 33–14.Google Scholar
Soyka, W. 1949. Monographie der Mymar-Gruppe mit den Gattungen Mymar Curtis, Synanaphes Soyka, Ferrierella Soyka, Anaphoidea Girault, Hofenederia Soyka, Fulmekiella Soyka, und Yungaburra Girault (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Mymaridae). Revta Ent., Rio de J. 20: 301–422.Google Scholar
Soyka, W. 1950. New and known alaptids and mymarids from Egypt (Hymenoptera-Chalcidoidea). Bull. Soc. Fouadl. Ent. 34: 121–131.Google Scholar
Stegmaier, C.E. 1973. Colonization of the puncturevine stem weevil, Microlarinus lypriformis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) with notes on parasitism in South Florida. Fla Ent. 56: 235–241.Google Scholar
Subba Rao, B.R., and Hayat, M.. 1983. Key to the genera of Oriental Mymaridae, with a preliminary catalog (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). pp. 125–150in Gupta, V.K. (Ed.), Studies on the Hymenoptera. A Collection of Articles on Hymenoptera Commemorating the 70th Birthday of Henry K. Townes. Contr. Am. Ent. Inst. (Ann Arbor) 20: 1–471.Google Scholar
Subba Rao, B.R., and Kaur, R.B.. 1959. Studies on Indian Mymaridae—Part I. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 49B: 227–238.Google Scholar
Swezey, O.H. 1916. “Gonatocerus mexicanus,” a mymarid parasitic in the eggs of “Draeculacephala mollipes” in Hawaii. Proc. Hawaii, ent. Soc. 3: 146.Google Scholar
Thompson, W.R. 1958. A catalogue of the parasites and predators of insect pests. Section 2. Host parasite catalogue. Part 5. Hosts of the Hymenoptera (Miscogasteridae to Trigonalidae), Lepidoptera and Strepsiptera. Commonw. Inst. biol. Control. Ottawa, pp. 562–698.Google Scholar
Timberlake, P.H. 1924. Records of the introduced and immigrant chalcid-flies of the Hawaiian Islands (Hymenoptera). Proc. Hawaii, ent. Soc. 5: 418–449.Google Scholar
Torre Bueno, J.R. 1978. A Glossary of Entomology. New York Entomological Society, New York. 336 + 36 pp.Google Scholar
Turner, W.F., and Pollard, H.N.. 1959. Life histories and behavior of five insect vectors of phony peach disease. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1188. 28 pp.Google Scholar
Viggiani, G. 1966. Una specie di Mymar Curtis (M. taprobanicum Ward) nuova per l'Europa (Ricerche sugli Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea. V). Boll. Soc. ent. ital. 96: 113–117.Google Scholar
Viggiani, G. 1969. Ricerche sugli Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea. XX. Le specie paleartiche del genere Lymaenon Walker (Mymaridae) gruppo longicauda (Enock), con descrizione di nuovo specie. Entomologica, Napoli 5: 37–50.Google Scholar
Viggiani, G. 1973. Ricerche sugli Hymenoptera Chalcidoidea. X.X.X. Notizie preliminari sulla struttura e sul significato dell'armatura genitale esterna maschile dei Mimaridi. Boll. Lab. Ent. agric. Filippo Silvestri 30: 269–281.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1846. Descriptions of the Mymaridae. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 18: 49–54.Google Scholar
Webb, D.W. 1980. Primary insect types in the Illinois Natural History Survey Collection, exclusive of the Collembola and Thysanoptera. Bull. Ill. St. nat. Hist. Surv. 32: 55–191.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A.G., and Valley, K.R.. 1980. Graphocephala coccinea: seasonal history and habits on ericaceous shrubs, with notes on G. fennahi (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Melsheim. Ent. Ser. 29: 23–27.Google Scholar
Whittaker, O. 1931. Four new species of Mymaridae from British Columbia (Hymenoptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 33: 189–192.Google Scholar
Wiley, E.O. 1981. Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 439 pp.Google Scholar