Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:22:45.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

World Review and Keys to Genera of the Subfamily Inostemmatinae with Reassignment of the Taxa to the Platygastrinae and Sceliotrachelinae (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Lubomir Masner  and
Lars Huggert
Get access

Abstract

The subfamily Inostemmatinae is considered a symplesiomorphic assemblage and the genera currently classified here are reassigned either to the subfamily Platygastrinae or the Sceliotrachelinae. Forty-one genera are treated, of which 15 are classified in the Platygastrinae, viz. Acerotella Masner, Aceroteta Kozlov and Masner, Allostemma gen.nov., Almargella gen.nov., Annettella gen.nov., Inostemma Haliday, Iphitrachelus Walker, Isostasius Foerster, Magellanium gen.nov., Metaclisis Foerster, Orseta gen.nov., Proplatygaster Kieffer, Rao gen.nov., Sacespalus Kieffer, and Zelostemma gen.nov. Twenty-six genera are classified in the subfamily Sceliotrachelinae, viz. Afrisolia gen.nov., Aleyroctonus gen.nov., Alfredella gen.nov., Allotropa Foerster, Amitus Haldeman, Aphanomerella Dodd, Aphanomerus Perkins, Austromerus gen.nov., Calomerella gen.nov., Errolium gen.nov., Fidiobia Ashmead, Helava gen.nov., Isolia Foerster, Nanomerus gen.nov., Neobia gen.nov., Oligomerella gen.nov., Parabaeus Kieffer, Platygastoides Dodd, Platystasius Nixon, Plutomerus gen.nov., Pseudaphanomerus Szelényi, Pulchrisolia Szabo, Sceliotrachelus Brues, Tetrabaeus Kieffer, Zelamerus gen.nov., and Zelandonota gen.nov. The following extant taxa are described: Afrisolia obesa gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ (South Africa), Aleyroctonus pilatus gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ ♂ (Java), Alfredella tasmanica gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ ♂ (Australia),Allostemma fuscum gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ ♂ (Chile), Almargella cristata gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ ♂ (Chile), Annettella gracilis gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ ♂ (New Zealand), Austromerus grandis gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ ♂ (Australia), Calomerella scutellata gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ (USA, Canada), Errolium piceum gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ (New Zealand), Helava alticola gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ ♂ (Colombia, Venezuela, Peru), Magellanium furviceps gen.nov., sp.nov. ♂ (Chile), Nanomerus spinulus gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ (Chile), Neobia badia gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ (Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Trinidad [W.I.]), Oligomerella donnae gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ (Australia), Orseta ornate gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ ♂ (Canada), Plutomerus gen.nov. for Platygastoides indicus Mukerjee ♀ (India, Nepal), Rao pselaphus gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ ♂ (Australia), Zelamerus amicorum gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ ♂ (New Zealand), Zelandonota kiwi gen.nov., sp.nov. ♀ ♂ (New Zealand), and Zelostemma gen.nov. for Eurytoma oleariae Maskell ♀ ♂ (New Zealand). Fahringeria Kieffer is considered junior synonym of Fidiobia Ashmead; Nasdia Nixon and Platytropa Kozlov are considered junior synonyms of Allotropa Foerster. The above 41 genera are keyed, with separate keys to world genera and genera of America north of Mexico; with generic diagnoses, taxonomic remarks, distribution, biology, bibliography, and list of species described since Kieffer (1926). Higher classification and relationships of the above genera are discussed. Eighty-one plates with 258 figures (line drawings and micrographs) are included.

Résumé

La sous-famille des Inostemmatinés est considérée comme un assemblage symplesiomorphique et les genres actuellement classés dans cette sous-famille sont réaffectés, soit à sous-famille des Platygastrinés ou des Sceliotrachelinés. L’ouvrage examine 41 genres dont 15 sont classés dans les Platygastrinés, soit Acerotella Masner, Aceroteta Kozlov et Masner, Allostemma nouveau genre, Almargella nouveau genre, Annettella nouveau genre, Inostemma Haliday, Iphitrachelus Walker, Isostasius Foerster, Magellanium nouveau genre, Metaclisis Foerster, Orseta nouveau genre, Proplatygaster Kieffer, Rao nouveau genre, Sacespalus Kieffer et Zelostemma nouveau genre. Vingtsix genres sont classés dans la sous-famille de Sceliotrachelinés, soit Afrisolia nouveau genre, Aleyroctonus nouveau genre, Alfredella nouveau genre, Allotropa Foerster, Amitus Haldeman, Aphanomerella Dodd, Aphanomerus Perkins, Austromerus nouveau genre, Calomerella nouveau genre, Errolium nouveau genre, Fidiobia Ashmead, Helava nouveau genre, Isolia Foerster, Nanomerus nouveau genre, Neobia nouveau genre, Oligomerella nouveau genre, Parabaeus Kieffer, Platygastoides Dodd, Platystasius Nixon, Plutomerus nouveau genre, Pseudaphanomerus Szelényi, Pulchrisolia Szabo, Sceliotrachelus Brues, Tetrabaeus Kieffer, Zelamerus nouveau genre et Zelandonota nouveau genre. L’ouvrage décrit les taxons encore existants suivants : Afrisolia obesa nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ (Afrique du Sud), Aleyroctonus pilatus nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ ♂ (Java), Alfredella tasmanica nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ ♂ (Australie), Allostemma fuscum nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ ♂ (Chili), Almargella cristata nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ ♂ (Chili), Annettella gracilis nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ ♂ (Nouvelle-Zélande), Austromerus grandis nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ ♂ (Australie), Calomerella scutellata nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce, ♀ (États-Unis, Canada), Errolium piceum nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ (Nouvelle-Zélande), Helava alticola nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ ♂ (Colombie, Venezuela, Pérou), Magellanium furviceps nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ (Chili), Nanomerus spinulus nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ (Chili), Neobia badia nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ (Venezuela, Colombie, Équateur, Trinité/Antilles), Oligomerella donnae nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ (Australie), Orseta ornata nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ ♂ (Canada), Plutomerus nouveau genre pour Platygastoides indicus Mukerjee ♀ (Inde, Népal), Rao pselaphus nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ ♂ (Australie), Zelamerus amicorum nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ ♂ (Nouvelle-Zélande), Zelandonota kiwi nouveau genre, nouvelle espèce ♀ ♂ (Nouvelle-Zélande) et Zelostemma nouveau genre pour Eurytoma oleariae Maskell ♀ ♂ (Nouvelle-Zélande). Fahringeria est considéré comme un synonyme secondaire de Fidiobia Ashmead; Nasdia Nixon et Platytropa Kozlov sont considérés comme des synonymes secondaires de Allotropa Foerster. L’ouvrage présente une clef d’identification des 41 genres susmentionnés et des clefs séparées pour les genres mondiaux et les genres des régions d’Amérique situées au nord du Mexique, des diagnostics génériques, des remarques taxonomiques, des distributions, des cycles biologiques, une bibliographie et une liste des espèces décrites depuis Kieffer (1926). L’ouvrage examine la classification supérieure et les rapports des genres susmentionnés. Il comprend 81 planches et 258 illustrations (croquis et micrographies).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 121 , Supplement S147 , 1989 , pp. 3 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alekseyev, V.N. 1979. A new species of the genus Isolia (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae) from Middle Asia. Zool. Zhurn. 58: 763–764.Google Scholar
Annecke, D.P., and Prinsloo, G.L.. 1977. A new species of Allotropa Foerster (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae) parasitic in the citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri (Risso) (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), in South Africa. J. ent. Soc. Sth. Afr. 40: 105–108.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1887. Studies on the North American Proctotrapidae, with descriptions of new species from Florida (Paper No. 2). Can. Ent. 19: 125–132.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1893. A monograph of the North American Proctotrypidae. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 45. 472 pp., 2 figs., 18 pls.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1901. Classification of the pointed-tailed wasps Proctotrypoidea. Part I. J.N.Y. ent. Soc. 10: 240–247.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1903. Classification of the pointed-tailed wasps Proctotrypoidea. Part II. J.N.Y. ent. Soc. 11: 86–94.Google Scholar
Austin, A.D. 1983. Morphology and mechanics of the ovipositor system of Ceratobaeus Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) and related genera. Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 12(2–3): 131–155.Google Scholar
Austin, A.D. 1984. New species of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera) from India which parasitise pests of mango, particularly Procontarinia spp. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Bull. ent. Res. 74: 549–557.Google Scholar
Bin, F. 1981. Definition of female antennal clava based on its plate sensilla in Hymenoptera, Scelionidae, Telenominae. Redia 64: 245–261.Google Scholar
Brèthes, J. 1913. Himenopteros de la América meridional. Ann. Mus. Nat. Hist. Buenos Aires 24: 35–165.Google Scholar
Brèthes, J. 1914. Les enemies de la Diaspis pentagona dans la République Argentine. Nunquam otiosus 1: 1–16.Google Scholar
Brèthes, J. 1916. Hymenopteres parasites de l'Amérique méridionale. Ann. Mus. Nat. Hist. Buenos Aires 27: 401–430.Google Scholar
Brèthes, J. 1919. Cueillette d'insectes du Rio Blanco. Rev. Chil. 22: 161–171.Google Scholar
Braes, C.T. 1908. in Wytsman: Genera Insectorum, Scelionidae, 80: 13.Google Scholar
Brèthes, J. 1922. Some hymenopterous parasites of lignicolous Itoniidae. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 57: 263–288, 2 pls., 2 figs.Google Scholar
Brèthes, J. 1940. Fossil Parasitic Hymenoptera of the family Scelionidae from Baltic amber. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 74: 69–90.Google Scholar
Clancy, D.W. 1944. Biology of Allotropa burrelli, a gregarious parasite of Pseudococcus comstocki. J. Agric. Res. Wash. 69: 159–167, 2 figs.Google Scholar
Clausen, C.P. 1958. Biological control of insects pests. A. Rev. Ent. 3: 291–310.Google Scholar
Debauche, H.R. 1947. Scelionidae de la faune belge. Bull. Ann. Soc. ent. Belg. 83: 255–285.Google Scholar
DeSantis, L. 1937. Una nueva especie de himenoptero del género Amitus de la Republica Argentina. Rev. Arg. Agron. 4: 115–118.Google Scholar
DeSantis, L. 1941. Lista de Himenopteros parasitos y predatores de los insectos de la Republica Argentina. Bol. Soc. brasil. Agron. Rio de Janeiro 4: 1–66.Google Scholar
DeSantis, L. 1960. Descripcion de un nuevo escelionido mirmecofilo del Brasil. (Hymenopt. Scelionidae). Neotropica 6: 17–20.Google Scholar
DeSantis, L. 1970. El genero Parabaeus de himenopteros proctotrupoideos. Rev. Soc. Ent. Arg. 32: 47–50, 1 fig.Google Scholar
Dodd, A.P. 1914 a. Further new genera and species of Australian Proctotrypoidea. Proc. R. Soc. Qld. 26: 91–140.Google Scholar
DeSantis, L. 1914 b. Australian Hymenoptera Proctotrypoidea, No. 2. Trans. R. Soc. Sth. Aust. 38: 58–131.Google Scholar
Dowell, R.V. 1979. Synchrony and impact of Amitus hesperidum (Hym. Platygastridae) on its host, Aleurocanthus woglumi (Hom. Aleyrodidae) in southern Florida. Entomophaga 24: 233–239.Google Scholar
Foerster, A. 1856. Hymenopterologische Studien. 2. 152 pp., Aachen.Google Scholar
Foerster, A. 1861. Ein Tag in den Hochalpen. Progr. Realsch. Aachen 1860–1861. 44 pp.Google Scholar
Foerster, A. 1878. Kleine Monographien parasitischer Hymenopteren. Verh. Ver. Rheinlande 35: 42–82.Google Scholar
Fouts, R.M. 1923. Description of a new serphoid parasite (Hymen.). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 25: 64–65.Google Scholar
Fouts, R.M. 1925. New serphoid parasite from North and South America (Hymenoptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 27: 147–152.Google Scholar
Gahan, A.B. 1924. On the identity of Eurytoma oleariae Maskell. Trans. N. Zeal. Inst. 55: 687–688.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, J. 1939. Le genre Inostemma en Afrique (Hym. Proct. Platygasteridae). Bull. Mus. roy. Hist. nat. Belg. 15: 1–3.Google Scholar
Gilliatt, F.C. 1939. The life history of Allotropo utilis Mues., a hymenopterous parasite of the orchard mealybug in Nova Scotia. Can. Ent. 71: 160–163.Google Scholar
Haeussler, G.J., and Clancy, D.W.. 1944. Natural enemies of Comstock mealybug in the Eastern States. J. econ. Ent. 37: 503–509.Google Scholar
Hirashima, Y. 1984. On the question of Inostemma seoulis or Inostemma seoule. Esakia 22: 163–164.Google Scholar
Huggert, L. 1976. A new genus and three new species of Platygastridae from Zaire, with a key to species of Iphitrachelus Walk. and supplementary descriptions of Leptacis spp. (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Ent. scand. 7: 217–229.Google Scholar
Ishii, T. 1953. A report of the studies of the parasitic wasps of injurious insects. Bull. Fac. Agric. Tokyo Univ. (Agric. & Tech.). 1(2): 1–10.Google Scholar
Jackson, D.L. 1966. A nearctic species of Iphitrachelus, with a key to the known species. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 68: 265–268.Google Scholar
Jansson, A. 1956. Studier over svenska proctotrupider. 10. Fidiobia tatrae Szel. (Platygasteridae, Inostemminae, adhuc falso Platygasterinae), en art med utbredd forekomst i Sverige. Ent. Tidskr. 77: 87–90.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1910. Diagnoses de nouveau genres et de nouvelles espèces de Scélionides (Hym.) des îles Séchelles. Bull. Soc. ent. France 1910: 292–294.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1912. No. IV. Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea. Trans. Linn. Soc. London 15: 45–80.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1913. Description de nouveaux Microhyménoptèeres. Broteria 11: 169–198.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1914. In André, , Spec. Hym. Eur. Alg. 11: 355.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1926. Scelionidae. Das Tierreich 48. 885 pp. Berlin & Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ko, J.H. 1965. Studies on the Isostasius seoulis (sp.n.), the larval parasite of pine gallmidge (Thecodiplosis japonensis Uchida & Inouye). Taxonomical and Morphological Studies. Res. Rep. Off. Rural Dev. 8: 91–96.Google Scholar
Ko, J.H. 1980. A new species of Inostemma (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae), a larval parasite of the pine gall midge, Thecodiplosis sp. (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Kor. J. Plant Prot. 19: 35–37.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M.A. 1970. Supergeneric groupings of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) Rev. ent. USSR 39: 203–226.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M.A. 1972. A palearctic species of the genus Sceliotrachelus Brues, 1980 (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae) from the Mongolian People's Republic. Rev. ent. USSR 51: 133–135.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M.A. 1974. On the fauna of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) of the Mongolian People's Republic. II. Isostasius Foerster, Inostemma Haliday (Platygastridae). Nasekomye Mongolii (Leningrad) 2: 277–281.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M.A. 1976. A new genus and a new species of the family Platygastridae (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea) from Armenia. Proc. Zool. Inst. Leningrad 64: 79–81.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M.A. 1977. A new genus of the family Platygastridae (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea) from the European part of the USSR and Canada. Acad. Sci. US.R. Zool. Inst. & All-Union Ent. Soc. (Leningrad) 1977: 94–98.Google Scholar
Kozlov, M.A. 1978. in Medvedev, G.S. 1978. Keys to insects of the European part of U.S.R. Hymenoptera, Superfamily Proctotrupoidea, 3(2): 538–691.Google Scholar
Krombein, K.V. 1964. Natural history of Plummers Island, Maryland. X.I.I. The hibiscus wasp, an abundant rarity and its associates. (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). Proc. biol. Soc. Wash. 77: 73–112, 6 pls.Google Scholar
Loiacono, M. 1982. Un nuevo platygastrido (Hymenoptera-Platygastridae) criado de huevos de Naupactus xanthographus Germ. (Coleoptera-Curculionidae). Rev. Soc. ent. Arg. 41: 85–88.Google Scholar
MacGown, M. W., and Nebeker, T.E.. 1978. Taxonomic review of Amitus (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea, Platygastridae) of the Western Hemisphere. Can. Ent. 110: 275–283.Google Scholar
Madrid, F.J. 1974. Rhopalomyia nothofagi Gagne, Biologia y dano en roble (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Bol. Soc. Biol. Concepcion 48: 395–402.Google Scholar
Maneval, H. 1936. Nouveau genre et nouvelles espèces de Platygasterinae (Hym.) de la faune Franco-Belge. Bull. Ann. Soc. ent. Belg. 76: 45–58, 8 figs.Google Scholar
Mani, M.S. 1939. Descriptions of new and records of some known chalcidoid and other hymenopterous parasites from India. Ind. J. Ent. 1: 69–99.Google Scholar
Mani, M.S. 1941. Serphoidea. Cat. Indian Ins. 26. 52 pp.Google Scholar
Mani, M.S. 1975. On a collection of Scelionidae and Platygasteridae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrypoidea) from India. Mem. School Ent., Agra 4: 63–80.Google Scholar
Mani, M.S., and Sharma, S.K.. 1982. Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) from India. A review. Oriental Insects 16: 135–258.Google Scholar
Marchal, P. 1906. Recherches sur la biologie et le dévelopment des Hyménoptères parasites, II. Les Platygasters. Arch. Zool. 4: 485–640.Google Scholar
Maskell, W.M. 1888. On some gall-producing insects in New Zealand. Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst. 21: 253–258, 2 pls.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1955. Bemerkungen zur Familie Scelionidae aus der CSR (Hymenoptera). Acta ent. Mus. Nat. Pragae 30: 137–142.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1956. First preliminary report on the occurrence of genera of the group Proctotrupoidea (Hym.) in CSR. (First part — family Scelionidae). Acta faun. ent. mus. nat. Pragae 1: 99–126.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1957. Remarks on the genus Iphitrachelus Walker, 1835 (Hym. Scelionidae). Acta. soc. ent. Cechosl. 54: 1–8.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1958. Zusatzliche Bemerkungen zur Gattung Iphitrachelus Walk. (Hym. Scelionidae). Mitt. Schweiz. ent. Ges. 31: 52–56.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1964 a. Remarks on the taxonomy of Sceliotrachelus Braes and allied genera (Hymenoptera, Platygas teridae). Psyche 68: 59–63.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1964 b. A comparison of some Nearctic and Palearctic genera of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera), with revisionai notes. Acta soc. ent. Cechosl. 61: 123–155.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1965. The types of Proctotrupoidea (Hymenoptera) in the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) and the Hope Department of Entomology (Oxford). Bull. Brit. Mus. Suppl. 1. 124 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1976 a. The Nearctic species of Iphitrachelus Walker (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Platygastridae), with a key to world species. Can. Ent. 108: 1065–1068.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1976 b. Revisionary notes and keys to world genera of Scelionidae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 97. 87 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1980 a. Key to genera of Scelionidae of the Holarctic region, with descriptions of new genera and species (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea). Mem. ent. soc. Can. 113. 54 pp.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1980 b. The Nearctic species of Acerotella Masner (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Platygastridae). Can. Ent. 112: 1291–1303.Google Scholar
Masner, L. 1981. Revision of the Nearctic species of Metaclisis Foerster (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae, Inostemmatinae). Can. Ent. 113: 1069–1091.Google Scholar
Masner, L., and Gibson, G.A.P.. 1979. The separation bag; a new device to aid in collecting insects. Can. Ent. 111: 1197–1198.Google Scholar
Masner, L., and Goulet, H.. 1981. A new model of flight-interception trap for some hymenopterous insects. Ent. News 92: 199–202.Google Scholar
Mason, W.R.M. 1986. Standard drawing conventions and definitions for venational and other features of wing of Hymenoptera. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 88: 1–7.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1939. A new mealybug parasite (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Can. Ent. 71: 158–160.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1942. Two new species of Allotropo (Platygasteridae, Serphoidea) parasitic on the Comstock mealybug. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 37: 170–173.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1954. Three new mealybug parasites of the genus Allotropo (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 49: 18–21.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1963. A platgastrid parasite of certain wasp larvae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea, Platygastridae). Beitr. Ent. 13: 391–394.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1970. A new mealybug parasite from Japan (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 72: 318–319, 2 figs.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W.In Kiombein, K. V. et al. , 1979. Proctotrupoidea. Catalog of Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Vol. 1. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 1198 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W., and Masner, L.. In Krombein, K.V., and Burks, B.D.. 1967. Proctotrupoidea. Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic catalog. Agric. Monogr. 2 (Suppl. 2): 285–305.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W., and Walkley, L.M.. 1951. In Muesebeck, et al. 1951. Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic catalog. Agric. Monogr. 2. 1420 pp., U.S. Dept. Agric, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W., and Walkley, L.M.. 1956. Type species of the genera and subgenera of the parasitic wasps comprising the superfamily Proctotrupoidea (Order Hymenoptera). Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 105: 319–419.Google Scholar
Mukerjee, M.K. 1981. On a collection of Scelionidae and Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea) from India. Rec. Zool. Survey India, Misc. Publ. 27. 78 pp.Google Scholar
Murakami, Y. 1962. Studies on natural enemies of a mealybug Phenaecoccus pergamdei Cockerell, I. Sci. Bull. Foe. Agric. Kyushu Univ., Fukuoka 19: 381–388.Google Scholar
Musil, M. 1958. Eine neue Art der Gattung Inostemma Haliday aus der Slowakei (Hym. Proct.). Acta Soc. ent. Cechosl. Prague, 55: 350–353, 1 fig.Google Scholar
Myers, J.G. 1927. Natural enemies of the pear leaf-curling midge, Perrisia pyri Bouché (Dipt. Cecidom.). Bull. Ent. Res. 18: 129–138, 5 figs.Google Scholar
Nixon, G.E.J. 1937. A new genus belonging to the subfamily Platygasterinae (Hym., Proctotrupoidea). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 10 19: 372–376.Google Scholar
Nixon, G.E.J. 1942. A remarkable new genus of Telenominae (Hym. Proctotrupoidea, Scelionidae). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 11 9: 462–464.Google Scholar
Nixon, G.E.J. 1969. Two new species of Platystasius Nixon with a note on the generic relationships between Platystasius and Fidiobia Ashmead. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 71: 445–449.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A.A. 1926. A new species of Allotropo (Scelionidae, Hymenoptera). Acta ent. Mus. Nat. Pragae 4: 145–150.Google Scholar
Ogloblin, A.A. 1944. Two new species of Proctotrupoidea from Iowa (Hymenoptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 45: 155–158.Google Scholar
Perkins, R.C.L. 1905. Leaf-hoppers and their natural enemies. Part VI. Mymaridae, Platygasteridae. Bull. exp. Stat. Hawaii: 187–205, pls. 11–13.Google Scholar
Richards, O.W. and Davies, R.G.. 1977. Imm's General Textbook of Entomology, 10th ed., vol. 2. 1334 pp.Google Scholar
Riek, E.F. 1970. Hymenoptera. pp. 867–959in The Insects of Australia. C.I.O. Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Risbec, J. 1950. II. Contribution à l'étude des Proctotrupidae (Serphiidae). Trav. Lab. Ent. Sect. Soudan Rech. agron. 2: 511–639.Google Scholar
Risbec, J. 1955. Platygasterinae de Madagascar (Hym. Proctotrupidae). Bull. Soc. zool. France 8: 109–118.Google Scholar
Risbec, J.Description d'un nouveau Baeinien africain Parabaeus machadoi n.sp. (Hym. Scelionidae). Publ. Cult. Comp. Diam. Angola 34: 85–90.Google Scholar
Roskam, J.C. 1986. Biosystematics of insects living in female birch catkins. IV. Egg-larval parasitoides of the genera Platygaster Latreille and Metaclisis Foerster (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae). Tijdschr. Ent. 129: 125–140.Google Scholar
Silvestri, F. 1927. Contribuzione alla conoscenza degli Aleurodidae (Inserta: Hemiptera) viventi su citrus in Estremo Oriente e dei loro parassiti (Hym.). Boll. Lab. Zool. Portici 21: 1–60, 34 figs.Google Scholar
Steyskal, G.C. 1981. A bibliography of the Malaise trap. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 83: 225–229.Google Scholar
Sundholm, A. 1956. Anopediella nov.gen. (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Platygasteridae). Ent. Tidskr. 77: 79–83.Google Scholar
Sundholm, A. 1958. Anopediella Sundh. congeneric with Platystasius Nixon (Hym., Proctotrupoidea, Platygasteridae). Ent. Tidskr. 78: 269–271.Google Scholar
Sundholm, A. 1970. Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea. In South African Animal Life. Stat. Naturvetenskap. Forsk. Stockholm 14: 306–401.Google Scholar
Szabo, J.B. 1958. Ergaenzende Beobachtungen ueber die Holarktische Gattung Fidiobia Ashmead 1894. Folia ent. hung. Budapest (N.S.) 11: 457–164, 7 figs.Google Scholar
Sundholm, A. 1959 a. Notes on the new tribus Amitini with the descriptions of a new genus and some new species of the Arctogaea (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea, Platygasteridae). Ann. Hist. Nat. Mus. Nat. Hung. 51: 389–396.Google Scholar
Sundholm, A. 1959 b. A new palearctic species of the genus Metaclisis Foerster, 1856 from south of Hungary (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea). Opusc. Zool. 3: 89–94.Google Scholar
Sundholm, A. 1962. Untersuchungen an palaarktischen Proctotrupiden I–IV (Hymenoptera). I.I. Beschreibung von Isolia striatitergitis sp.n. aus Ungarn/Hym. Proct. Platygasteridae/. Folia ent. hung. 15: 238–241.Google Scholar
Sundholm, A. 1981. Contributions to the platygasterid wasps of the Hortobagy National Park (Hymenoptera, Platygasteridae). In The Fauna of the Hortobagy National Park. Publ. House Hung. Acad. Sci. 1981: 285–297.Google Scholar
Szelenyi, G. 1938 a. Ueber eine verkannte Gattung der Platygasteriden, nebst Beschreibung 2 neuer Arten aus der Familie Scelioniden (Hym. Proctotr.). Folia ent. hung. 3: 100–105.Google Scholar
Sundholm, A. 1938 b. Ueber palaarktische Scelioniden (Hym. Proct.) (Mit 16 Textfiguren). Ann. Mus. Nat. Hung. 31: 108–128.Google Scholar
Sundholm, A. 1941. Neue Gattungen und Arten der palaearktischen Scelioniden (Hym. Proctotrupoidea). Zool. Anz., Leipzig 134: 158–168, 13 figs.Google Scholar
Tomsik, B. 1950. Czechoslovak Inostemmini — the parasites of Cecidomyiidae. Folia ent. 13: 49–64.Google Scholar
Viggiani, G., and Battaglia, D.. 1983. Courtship and mating behaviour of two species of Amitus Hald. (Hymenoptera, Platygastridae). Boll. lab. ent. agr. Portici 40: 115–118.Google Scholar
Viggiani, G., and Mazzone, P.. 1982. The Amitus Hald. (Hym. Platygastridae) of Italy, with descriptions of three new species. Boll. lab. ent. agr. Portici 39: 59–65, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Vikberg, V. 1965. Inostemma brevicornu sp.n. (Hym., Platygasteridae) from southern Finland. Ann. ent. fenn., Helsinki 31: 94–101.Google Scholar
Vlug, H.J. 1973. The types of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea) in the collection of the “Naturhistorisches Museum” in Vienna with special reference to the types of Foerster. Entomophaga 18: 175–184.Google Scholar
Vlug, H.J., and Graham, M.R.W. de V.. 1984. The types of Platygastridae (Hymenoptera, Scelionidae) described by Haliday and Walker and preserved in the National Museum of Ireland and the British Museum (Natural History). Designation of lectotypes, pp. 115–135. Tijdschr. Ent. 127: 115–135.Google Scholar
Whittaker, O. 1930. Eight new species of Serphoidea (Hymenoptera) from British Columbia. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 32: 129–135.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, K. 1982. Contribution to the knowledge of the Platygastridae of Japan (Hymenoptera, Proctotrupoidea). Kontyu 50: 88–94.Google Scholar
Yoshida, N., and Hirashima, Y.. 1979. Systematic studies on Proctotrupoid and Chalcidoid parasites of gall midges injurious to Pinus and Cryptomeria in Japan and Korea (Hymenoptera). Esakia 14: 113–133.Google Scholar