Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-7mfl8 Total loading time: 0.524 Render date: 2021-12-01T11:46:27.543Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Improved Three-Dimensional (3D) Resolution of Electron Tomograms Using Robust Mathematical Data-Processing Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2017

Toby Sanders*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, PO Box 871804, Tempe, AZ 85287-1804, USA
Ilke Arslan
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA
*
* Corresponding author. toby.sanders@asu.edu

Abstract

Electron tomography has become an essential tool for three-dimensional (3D) characterization of nanomaterials. In recent years, advances have been made in specimen preparation and mounting, acquisition geometries, and reconstruction algorithms. All of these components work together to optimize the resolution and clarity of an electron tomogram. However, one important component of the data-processing has received less attention: the 2D tilt series alignment. This is challenging for a number of reasons, namely because the nature of the data sets and the need to be coherently aligned over the full range of angles. An inaccurate alignment may be difficult to identify, yet can significantly limit the final 3D resolution. In this work, we present an improved center-of-mass alignment model that allows us to overcome discrepancies from unwanted objects that enter the imaging area throughout the tilt series. In particular, we develop an approach to overcome changes in the total mass upon rotation of the imaging area. We apply our approach to accurately recover small Pt nanoparticles embedded in a zeolite that may otherwise go undetected both in the 2D microscopy images and the 3D reconstruction. In addition to this, we highlight the particular effectiveness of the compressed sensing methods with this data set.

Type
Instrumentation and Software
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batenburg, K.J., Bals, S., Sijbers, J., Kbel, C., Midgley, P.A., Hernandez, J.C., Kaiser, U., Encina, E.R., Coronado, E.A. & Van Tendeloo, G. (2009). 3d imaging of nanomaterials by discrete tomography. Ultramicroscopy 109(6), 730740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binev, P., Dahmen, W., DeVore, R., Lamby, ., Savu, D. & Sharpley, R. (2012). Compressed sensing and electron microscopy. In Modeling Nanoscale Imaging in Electron Microscopy, pp. 73126. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, S., Heikkonen, J. & Engelhardt, P. (2001). Automatic alignment of transmission electron microscope tilt series without fiducial markers. J Struct Biol 136(3), 201213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Z., Jin, X., Li, L. & Wang, G. (2013). A limited-angle CT reconstruction method based on anisotropic TV minimization. Phys Med Biol 58(7), 2119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, J. (2006). Introduction: Principles of electron tomography. In Electron Tomography: Methods for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Structures in the Cell, pp. 1–15. New York, NY: Springer New York.Google Scholar
Goris, B., Roelandts, T., Batenburg, K.J., Heidari Mezerji, H. & Bals, S. (2013). Advanced reconstruction algorithms for electron tomography: From comparison to combination. Frontiers of Electron Microscopy in Materials Science. Ultramicroscopy 127, 4047.Google Scholar
Hayashida, M. & Malac, M. (2016). Practical electron tomography guide: Recent progress and future opportunities. Micron 91, 4974.Google Scholar
Houben, L. & Bar Sadan, M. (2011). Refinement procedure for the image alignment in high-resolution electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 111(9), 15121520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S.D. & Härting, M. (2013). A new correlation based alignment technique for use in electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 135, 5663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kremer, J.R., Mastronarde, D.N. & McIntosh, J.R. (1996). Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol 116(1), 7176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leary, R., Saghi, Z., Midgley, P.A. & Holland, D.J. (2013). Compressed sensing electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 131, 7091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lučić, V., Förster, F. & Baumeister, W. (2005). Structural studies by electron tomography: from cells to molecules. Annu Rev Biochem 74, 833865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masich, S., Östberg, T., Norlén, L., Shupliakov, O. & Daneholt, B. (2006). A procedure to deposit fiducial markers on vitreous cryo-sections for cellular tomography. J Struct Biol 156(3), 461468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, T. (2017). Matlab imaging algorithms: Image reconstruction, restoration, and alignment, with a focus in tomography. Available at http://www.toby-sanders.com/software, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33492.60801 (retrieved January 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T., Gelb, A., Platte, R.B., Arslan, I. & Landskron, K. (2017). Recovering fine details from under-resolved electron tomography data using higher order total variation $$\ell _{1} $$ regularization. Ultramicroscopy 174, 97105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T., Prange, M., Akatay, C. & Binev, P. (2015). Physically motivated global alignment method for electron tomography. Adv Struct Chem Imaging 1(1), 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxton, W.O., Baumeister, W. & Hahn, M. (1984). Three-dimensional reconstruction of imperfect two-dimensional crystals. Ultramicroscopy 13(1–2), 5770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, M.C., Chien-Chun, C., Mecklenburg, M., Zhu, C., Xu, R., Ercius, P., Dahmen, U., Regan, B.C. & Miao, J. (2012). Electron tomography at 2.4-angstrom resolution. Nature 483(7390), 444447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorzano, C.O.S., Messaoudi, C., Eibauer, M., Bilbao-Castro, J.R., Hegerl, R., Nickell, S., Marco, S. & Carazo, J.M. (2009). Marker-free image registration of electron tomography tilt-series. BMC Bioinformatics 10(1), 124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Sanders and Arslan supplementary material

Sanders and Arslan supplementary material 1

Download Sanders and Arslan supplementary material(File)
File 41 MB
3
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Improved Three-Dimensional (3D) Resolution of Electron Tomograms Using Robust Mathematical Data-Processing Techniques
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Improved Three-Dimensional (3D) Resolution of Electron Tomograms Using Robust Mathematical Data-Processing Techniques
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Improved Three-Dimensional (3D) Resolution of Electron Tomograms Using Robust Mathematical Data-Processing Techniques
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *