Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T16:52:28.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of Self-Adhesive Resin Composites: Nondestructive Imaging of Resin–Dentin Interfacial Adaptation and Shear Bond Strength

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2015

Patricia Makishi ,
Rafael R. Pacheco ,
Alireza Sadr ,
Yasushi Shimada ,
Yasunori Sumi ,
Junji Tagami  and
Marcelo Giannini
Patricia Makishi
Affiliation:
Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Campinas, Avenue Limeira 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903, Brazil
Rafael R. Pacheco
Affiliation:
Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Campinas, Avenue Limeira 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903, Brazil
Alireza Sadr
Affiliation:
Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Campinas, Avenue Limeira 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903, Brazil
Yasushi Shimada
Affiliation:
Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Campinas, Avenue Limeira 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903, Brazil
Yasunori Sumi
Affiliation:
Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Campinas, Avenue Limeira 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903, Brazil
Junji Tagami
Affiliation:
Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Campinas, Avenue Limeira 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903, Brazil
Marcelo Giannini*
Affiliation:
Department of Restorative Dentistry, State University of Campinas, Avenue Limeira 901, Bairro Areião, Piracicaba, SP 13414-903, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. giannini@fop.unicamp.br
Get access

Abstract

Shear bond strength (SBS) and the interfacial adaptation (IA) of self-adhesive resin (SAR) composites to dentin were evaluated. Two SARs [Vertise Flow (VTF) and Fusio Liquid Dentin (FLD)] were evaluated and compared with a conventional restorative system [adhesive: OptiBond FL and composite: Herculite Précis (OBF/HP)]. Human third molars were used for SBS testing and IA imaging (n=7) using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Flattened dentin disks were prepared and the composites were applied into molds (2.4 mm diameter) that were positioned on dentin. Samples were subjected to SBS testing and OCT analysis, which considered an increase in signal intensity at the bonded interface as evidence of internal gaps. SBS data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s test and IA data (% distribution of high brightness values) by Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s test (p≤0.05). No statistically significant difference in SBS was observed between VTF (13.9±3.6 MPa) and FLD (11.3±3.2 MPa), whereas OBF/HP showed higher average strength (27.3±6.1 MPa). However, there was a statistically significant difference in IA when VTF (33.3%) was compared with FLD (1.2%) and OBF/HP (1.5%). The conventional restorative system exhibited superior SBS performance compared with SARs. However, the IA of FLD to dentin had values that were not significantly different from OBF/HP.

Keywords

adhesioncomposite resindentinbond strengthoptical coherence tomography
Type
Biological Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , December 2015 , pp. 1523 - 1529
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altunsoy, M., Botsali, M.S., Sari, T. & Onat, H. (2015). Effect of different surface treatments on the microtensile bond strength of two self-adhesive flowable composites. Lasers Med Sci 30, 1667–1673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakhsh, T.A., Sadr, A., Shimada, Y., Tagami, J. & Sumi, Y. (2011). Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: Validation against confocal microscopy. Dent Mater 27, 915–925.Google Scholar
Bista, B., Sadr, A., Nazari, A., Shimada, Y., Sumi, Y. & Tagami, J. (2013). Nondestructive assessment of current one-step self-etch dental adhesives using optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt 18, 76020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brezinski, M.E. (2006). Light and electromagnetic waves, section I. In Optical Coherence Tomography—Principles and Applications, Brezinski M.E. (Ed.), pp. 4–43. Philadelphia, PA: Academic Press/Elsevier, Inc.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A.O., Carrilho, M.R.O., Rueggeberg, F.A., Ambrosano, G.M.B. & Giannini, M. (2014). Bond strength, biaxial flexural strength and flexural modulus of dentin bonding systems exposed to water. Int J Adhes Adhes 49, 109–114.Google Scholar
De Munck, J., Van Landuyt, K., Peumans, M., Poitevin, A., Lambrechts, P., Braem, M. & Van Meerbeek, B. (2005). A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res 84, 118–132.Google Scholar
Ferracane, J.L. (2011). Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater 27, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferracane, J.L. (2013). Resin-based composite performance: Are there some things we can’t predict? Dent Mater 29, 51–58.Google Scholar
Fu, J., Kakuda, S., Pan, F., Hoshika, S., Ting, S., Fukuoka, A., Bao, Y., Ikeda, T., Nakaoki, Y., Selimovic, D., Sano, H. & Sidhu, S.K. (2013). Bonding performance of a newly developed step-less all-in-one system on dentin. Dent Mater J 32, 203–211.Google Scholar
Furness, A., Tadros, M.Y., Looney, S.W. & Rueggeberg, F.A. (2014). Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites. J Dent 42, 439–449.Google Scholar
Giannini, M., Di Francescantonio, M., Pacheco, R.R., Boaro, L.C. & Braga, R.R. (2014). Characterization of water sorption, solubility, and roughness of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite resins. Oper Dent 39, 264–272.Google Scholar
Ishibashi, K., Ozawa, N., Tagami, J. & Sumi, Y. (2011). Swept-source optical coherence tomography as a new tool to evaluate defects of resin-based composite restorations. J Dent 39, 543–548.Google Scholar
Juloski, J., Goracci, C., Rengo, C., Giovannetti, A., Vichi, A., Vulicevic, Z.R. & Ferrari, M. (2012). Enamel and dentin bond strength of new simplified adhesive materials with and without preliminary phosphoric acid-etching. Am J Dent 25, 239–243.Google Scholar
Loguercio, A., Luque-Martinez, I., Munoz, M., Szesz, A., Cuadros-Sanchez, J. & Reis, A. (2014). A comprehensive laboratory screening of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives. Oper Dent 39, 652–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makishi, P., Shimada, Y., Sadr, A., Tagami, J. & Sumi, Y. (2011). Non-destructive 3D imaging of composite restorations using optical coherence tomography: Marginal adaptation of self-etch adhesives. J Dent 39, 316–325.Google Scholar
Nakabayashi, N., Kojima, K. & Masuhara, E. (1982). The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 16, 265–273.Google Scholar
Nazari, A., Sadr, A., Shimada, Y., Tagami, J. & Sumi, Y. (2013). 3D assessment of void and gap formation in flowable resin composites using optical coherence tomography. J Adhes Dent 15, 237–243.Google Scholar
Pashley, D.H., Tay, F.R., Breschi, L., Tjaderhane, L., Carvalho, R.M., Carrilho, M. & Tezvergil-Mutluay, A. (2011). State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 27, 1–16.Google Scholar
Perdigão, J. (2010). Dentin/enamel bonding. J Esthet Restor Dent 22, 82–85.Google Scholar
Pitel, M.L. (2013). Low-shrink composite resins: A review of their history, strategies for managing shrinkage, and clinical significance. Compend Contin Educ Dent 34, 578–590.Google Scholar
Poitevin, A., De Munck, J., Van Ende, A., Suyama, Y., Mine, A., Peumans, M. & Van Meerbeek, B. (2013). Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 29, 221–230.Google Scholar
Rengo, C., Goracci, C., Juloski, J., Chieffi, N., Giovannetti, A., Vichi, A. & Ferrari, M. (2012). Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite. Aust Dent J 57, 220–226.Google Scholar
Salerno, M., Derchi, G., Thorat, S., Ceseracciu, L., Ruffilli, R. & Barone, A.C. (2011). Surface morphology and mechanical properties of new-generation flowable resin composites for dental restoration. Dent Mater 27, 1221–1228.Google Scholar
Sano, H., Takatsu, T., Ciucchi, B., Russell, C.M. & Pashley, D.H. (1995). Tensile properties of resin-infiltrated demineralized human dentin. J Dent Res 74, 1093–1102.Google Scholar
Shimada, Y., Sadr, A., Burrow, M.F., Tagami, J., Ozawa, N. & Sumi, Y. (2010). Validation of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for the diagnosis of occlusal caries. J Dent 38, 655–665.Google Scholar
Shimada, Y., Sadr, A., Nazari, A., Nakagawa, H., Otsuki, M., Tagami, J. & Sumi, Y. (2012). 3D evaluation of composite resin restoration at practical training using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Dent Mater J 31, 409–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tay, F.R., Gwinnett, A.J., Pang, K.M. & Wei, S.H. (1994). Structural evidence of a sealed tissue interface with a total-etch wet-bonding technique in vivo. J Dent Res 73, 629–636.Google Scholar
Van Landuyt, K.L., Snauwaert, J., De Munck, J., Coutinho, E., Poitevin, A., Yoshida, Y., Suzuki, K., Lambrechts, P. & Van Meerbeek, B. (2007 b). Origin of interfacial droplets with one-step adhesives. J Dent Res 86, 739–744.Google Scholar
Van Landuyt, K.L., Snauwaert, J., De Munck, J., Peumans, M., Yoshida, Y., Poitevin, A., Coutinho, E., Suzuki, K., Lambrechts, P. & Van Meerbeek, B. (2007 a). Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 28, 3757–3785.Google Scholar
Van Meerbeek, B. (2010). Dentin/enamel bonding. J Esthet Restor Dent 22, 157.Google Scholar
Van Meerbeek, B., De Munck, J., Yoshida, Y., Inoue, S., Vargas, M., Vijay, P., Van Landuyt, K., Lambrechts, P. & Vanherle, G. (2003). Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28, 215–235.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Meerbeek, B., Willems, G., Celis, J.P., Roos, J.R., Braem, M., Lambrechts, P. & Vanherle, G. (1993). Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72, 1434–1442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wajdowicz, M.N., Vandewalle, K.S. & Means, M.T. (2012). Shear bond strength of new self-adhesive flowable composite resins. Gen Dent 60, e104–e108.Google Scholar
Walter, R. (2013). Critical appraisal: Bulk-fill flowable composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent 25, 72–76.Google Scholar
Wei, Y.J., Silikas, N., Zhang, Z.T. & Watts, D.C. (2011). Hygroscopic dimensional changes of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater 27, 259–266.Google Scholar