Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Identifying and Correcting Scan Noise and Drift in the Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope

  • Lewys Jones (a1) and Peter D. Nellist (a1)

Abstract

The aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope has great sensitivity to environmental or instrumental disturbances such as acoustic, mechanical, or electromagnetic interference. This interference can introduce distortions to the images recorded and degrade both signal noise and resolution performance. In addition, sample or stage drift can cause the images to appear warped and leads to unreliable lattice parameters being exhibited. Here a detailed study of the sources, natures, and effects of imaging distortions is presented, and from this analysis a piece of image reconstruction code has been developed that can restore the majority of the effects of these detrimental image distortions for atomic-resolution data. Example data are presented, and the performance of the restored images is compared quantitatively against the as-recorded data. An improvement in apparent resolution of 16% and an improvement in signal-to-noise ratio of 30% were achieved, as well as correction of the drift up to the precision to which it can be measured.

Copyright

Corresponding author

* Corresponding author. E-mail: lewys.jones@materials.ox.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Braidy, N., Le Bouar, Y., Lazar, S. & Ricolleau, C. (2012). Correcting scanning instabilities from images of periodic structures. Ultramicroscopy 118, 6776.
Buban, J.P., Ramasse, Q., Gipson, B., Browning, N.D. & Stahlberg, H. (2010). High-resolution low-dose scanning transmission electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc 59(2), 103112.
Haider, M. (2000). Upper limits for the residual aberrations of a high-resolution aberration-corrected STEM. Ultramicroscopy 81(3-4), 163175.
Klie, R.F., Johnson, C. & Zhu, Y. (2008). Atomic-resolution STEM in the aberration-corrected JEOL JEM2200FS. Microsc Microanal 14(1), 104112.
Krivanek, O.L. (1999). Towards sub-Å electron beams. Ultramicroscopy 78(1-4), 111.
Muller, D.A. & Grazul, J. (2001). Optimizing the environment for sub-0.2 nm scanning transmission electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc 50(3), 219226.
Muller, D.A., Kirkland, E.J., Thomas, M.G., Grazul, J.L., Fitting, L. & Weyland, M. (2006). Room design for high-performance electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 106(11-12), 10331040.
Nakanishi, N. (2002). Retrieval process of high-resolution HAADF-STEM images. J Electron Microsc 51(6), 383390.
Pennycook, S.J., Chisholm, M.F., Lupini, A.R., Varela, M., Borisevich, A.Y., Oxley, M.P., Luo, W.D., van Benthem, K., Oh, S.-H., Sales, D.L., Molina, S.I., García-Barriocanal, J., Leon, C., Santamaría, J., Rashkeev, S.N. & Pantelides, S.T. (2009). Aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy: From atomic imaging and analysis to solving energy problems. Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser A 367(1903), 37093733.
Recnik, A., Möbus, G. & Sturm, S. (2005). IMAGE-WARP: A real-space restoration method for high-resolution STEM images using quantitative HRTEM analysis. Ultramicroscopy 103(4), 285301.
Rose, A. (1948). The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. J Opt Soc Am B: Opt Phys 38(2), 196208.
Takeguchi, M., Hashimoto, A., Shimojo, M., Mitsuishi, K. & Furuya, K. (2008). Development of a stage-scanning system for high-resolution confocal STEM. J Electron Microsc 57(4), 123127.
Urban, K., Kabius, B., Haider, M. & Rose, H. (1999). A way to higher resolution: Spherical-aberration correction in a 200 kV transmission electron microscope. J Electron Microsc 48(6), 821826.
von Alfthan, S., Benedek, N., Chen, L., Chua, A., Cockayne, D., Dudeck, K., Elsässer, C., Finnis, M.W., Koch, C.T., Rahmati, B., Rühle, M., Shih, S. & Sutton, A.P. (2010). The structure of grain boundaries in strontium titanate: Theory, simulation, and electron microscopy. Annu Rev Mater Res 40(1), 557599.
von Harrach, H. (1995). Instrumental factors in high-resolution FEG STEM. Ultramicroscopy 58(1), 15.
Voyles, P.M. & Muller, D.A. (2002). Fluctuation microscopy in the STEM. Ultramicroscopy 93(2), 147159.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Jones Supplementary Material
Appendix

 PDF (172 KB)
172 KB

Identifying and Correcting Scan Noise and Drift in the Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope

  • Lewys Jones (a1) and Peter D. Nellist (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.