Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Tracking Microscope Performance: A Workflow to Compare Point Spread Function Evaluations Over Time

  • Anna H. Klemm (a1), Andreas W. Thomae (a1), Katarina Wachal (a1) and Steffen Dietzel (a1)

Abstract

Routine system checks are essential for supervising the performance of an advanced light microscope. Recording and evaluating the point spread function (PSF) of a given system provides information about the resolution and imaging. We compared the performance of fluorescent and gold beads for PSF recordings. We then combined the open-source evaluation software PSFj with a newly developed KNIME pipeline named PSFtracker to create a standardized workflow to track a system's performance over several measurements and thus over long time periods. PSFtracker produces example images of recorded PSFs, plots full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) measurements over time and creates an html file which embeds the images and plots, together with a table of results. Changes of the PSF over time are thus easily spotted, either in FWHM plots or in the time series of bead images which allows recognition of aberrations in the shape of the PSF. The html file, viewed in a local browser or uploaded on the web, therefore provides intuitive visualization of the state of the PSF over time. In addition, uploading of the html file on the web allows other microscopists to compare such data with their own.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Author for correspondence: Steffen Dietzel, E-mail: dietzel@lmu.de; Anna H. Klemm, E-mail: anna.klemm@it.uu.se

Footnotes

Hide All

Current address: Anna Klemm, Department of Information Technology, Division of Visual Information and Interaction and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Sweden. anna.klemm@it.uu.se, Postal address: Box 337, 751 05 UPPSALA. Phone: +46/18-471 2868

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Amos, B, McConnell, G & Wilson, T (2012). Confocal microscopy. In Handbook of Comprehensive Biophysics, Vol. 2, Egelman, EH, ed., pp. 323. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Cox, G (2012). Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
Cox, G & Sheppard, CJ (2004). Practical limits of resolution in confocal and non-linear microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 63, 1822.
Egner, A & Hell, SW (2006). Aberrations in confocal and multi-photon fluorescence microscopy induced by refractive index mismatch. In Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, Pawley, JB (Ed.), pp. 404413. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.
Hell, S, Reiner, G, Cremer, C & Stelzer, EHK (1993). Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index. J Microsc 169, 391405.
Hibbs, AR, MacDonald, G & Garsha, K (2006). Practical confocal microscopy. In Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, Pawley, JB (Ed.), pp. 650671. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.
Hng, KI & Dormann, D (2013). ConfocalCheck – a software tool for the automated monitoring of confocal microscope performance. PLoS ONE 8, e79879.
Juškaitis, R (2006). Measuring the real point spread function of high numerical aperture microscope objective lenses. In Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, Pawley, JB (Ed.), pp. 239250. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.
Keller, HE (2006). Objective lenses for confocal microscopy. In Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, Pawley, JB (Ed.), pp. 145161. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.
Matthews, C & Cordelières, FP (2010). MetroloJ: an ImageJ plugin to help monitor microscopes’ health. In ImageJ User & Developer Conference. http://imagejdocu.tudor.lu/doku.php?id=plugin:analysis:metroloj:start
Pawley, JB (2006). Points, pixels & gray levels: Digitizing image data. In Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, Pawley, JB (Ed.), pp. 5979. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.
Schrader, M, Hell, SW & Voort, HTMVD (1996). Potential of confocal microscopes to resolve in the 50–100 nm range. Appl Phys Lett 69, 36443646.
Scientific Volume Imaging, S. (2018). The Nyquist rate. Vol. 2018. https://svi.nl/NyquistRate
Sheppard, CJR & Shotton, DM (1997). Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Bios Scientific Publishers in association with the Royal Microscopical Society. 106 pp. Oxford, UK. ISBN: 1-872748-72-4.
Theer, P, C., Mongis & M., Knop (2014). PSFj: Know your fluorescence microscope. Nat Methods 11, 981982.
Wilson, T (2011). Resolution and optical sectioning in the confocal microscope. J Microsc 244, 113121.
Zucker, RM (2014). Evaluating confocal system performance. In Confocal Microscopy: Methods and Protocols, Paddock, SW (Ed.), pp. 321374. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Klemm et al. supplementary material
Klemm et al. supplementary material 1

 Unknown (74.4 MB)
74.4 MB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Klemm et al. supplementary material
Klemm et al. supplementary material 2

 Unknown (81.6 MB)
81.6 MB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed