Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Less is More: Longer Exposure Times with Low Light Intensity is Less Photo-Toxic

  • Firas Mubaid (a1) and Claire M. Brown (a1) (a2)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Less is More: Longer Exposure Times with Low Light Intensity is Less Photo-Toxic
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Less is More: Longer Exposure Times with Low Light Intensity is Less Photo-Toxic
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Less is More: Longer Exposure Times with Low Light Intensity is Less Photo-Toxic
      Available formats
      ×
Abstract
Copyright
Corresponding author
* claire.brown@mcgill.ca
References
Hide All
[1] Renz, M, Cytometry A 83(9) (2013) 767779.
[2] Lichtman, JW and Conchello, JA, Nat Methods 2(12) (2005) 910919.
[3] Shimomura, O et al., J Cell Comp Physiol 59 (1962) 223239.
[4] Chalfie, M et al., Science 263(5148) (1994) 802805.
[5] Shaner, NC et al., Nat Biotechnol 22(12) (2004) 15671572.
[6] Day, RN and Davidson, MW, Chem Soc Rev 38(10) (2009) 28872921.
[7] Tsien, RY, FEBS Lett 579(4) (2005) 927932.
[8] Wiedenmann, J et al, Fluorescent Proteins: Nature’s Colorful Gifts for Live Cell Imaging. in Fluorescent Proteins II: Applicaiton of Fluorescent Protein Technology ed. O.S. Wolfbeis, Springer, Heidelberg Dordrecht, London, New York, 2012, p. 333.
[9] Galdeen, SA and North, AJ, Methods Mol Biol 769 (2011) 205222.
[10] Graf, R et al., Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 95 (2005) 5775.
[11] Goldman, RD and Spector, DL, Live Cell Imaging: A Laboratory Manual eds. RD Goldman, DL Spector, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 2005, p. 631.
[12] Haraguchi, T, Cell Struct Funct 27(5) (2002) 333334.
[13] Lacoste, J et al, Optimal Conditions for Live Cell Microscopy and Raster Image Correlation Spectroscopy (RICS). in Annual Reviews in Fluorescence 2010 ed. CD Geddes, Springer, New York, 2011.
[14] Lippincott-Schwartz, J, Nat Cell Biol 12(10) (2010) 918.
[15] Swedlow, JR and Platani, M, Cell Struct Funct 27(5) (2002) 335341.
[16] Frigault, MM et al., J Cell Sci 122(Pt 6) (2009) 753767.
[17] Lacoste, J et al., Methods Mol Biol 931 (2013) 6184.
[18] Waters, JC, Methods Cell Biol 114 (2013) 125150.
[19] Wang, Y et al., Annu Rev Biomed Eng 10 (2008) 138.
[20] Magidson, V and Khodjakov, A, Methods Cell Biol 114 (2013) 545560.
[21] Pattison, DI and Davies, MJ, EXS 96 (2006) 131157.
[22] Hoebe, RA et al., Nat Biotechnol 25(2) (2007) 249253.
[23] Evanko, D. “Is phototoxicity compromising exprimental results?” methagora: a blog from Nature Methods, posted Nov. 23, 2013, http://blogs.nature.com/methagora/2013/11/is-phototoxicity-compromising-experimental-results.html.
[24] Carlton, PM et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(37) (2010) 1601616022.
[25] Tinevez, JY et al., Methods Enzymol 506 (2012) 291309.
[26] Boudreau, C et al., Sci Rep 6 (2016) 30892.
[27] Waldchen, S et al., Sci Rep 5 (2015) 15348.
[28] Laissue, PP et al., Nat Methods 14 (2017) 657661.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Microscopy Today
  • ISSN: 1551-9295
  • EISSN: 2150-3583
  • URL: /core/journals/microscopy-today
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed