Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:53:10.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Arizona porphyry copper/hydrothermal deposits I. The structure of chenevixite and luetheite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2018

P. C. Burns*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, 156 Fitzpatrick, Notre Dame, IN 46556, U.S.A.
J. V. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A.
I. M. Steele
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A.
*
*E-mail: pburns@nd.edu

Abstract

The crystal structure of chenevixite, Cu2M2(AsO4)2(OH)4 (where M = Fe3+ or Al), pseudo-orthorhombic, monoclinic, a = 5.7012(8), b = 5.1801(7), c = 29.265(2) Å, β = 89.99(1)°, V = 864.3(4) Å3, space group B1211, Z = 4, was solved by direct methods and refined by least-squares techniques to R = 8.4% and a goodness-of-fit (S) of 1.37 for 1176 unique observed (F≥4σF) reflections collected for a twinned microcrystal using graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα X-rays and a CCD area detector. Vertex- and edge-sharing arsenate tetrahedra, Alϕ6 octahedra, and Jahn-Teller-distorted Cu2+ϕ6 octahedra [ϕ: O2−;, (OH);] form a framework unique from those in Cu2+ oxysalt minerals. Chains of edge-sharing Cu2+ϕ6 octahedra, with Alϕ6 octahedra attached on opposing sides by the sharing of edges, are linked into layers parallel to (001) by sharing vertices with AsO4 tetrahedra, and the layers are linked to form a frameworkby the sharing of polyhedral elements between adjacent Alϕ6 octahedra, as well as between AsO4 tetrahedra and Alϕ6 octahedra.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brese, N.E. and O'Keeffe, M. (1991) Bond-valence parameters for solids. Acta Crystallogr., B47, 192–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, P.C. (1998) CCD area detectors of X-rays applied to the analysis of mineral structures. Canad. Mineral., 36, 847853.Google Scholar
Burns, P.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1996) Static and dynamic Jahn-Teller effects in Cu2+ oxysalts. Canad. Mineral., 34, 1089–105.Google Scholar
Eby, R.K. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1993) Structural relations in copper oxysalt minerals. I. Structural hierarchy. Acta Crystallogr., B49, 2856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbst-Irmer, R. and Sheldrick, G.M. (1998) Refinement of twinned structures with SHELXL97 . Acta Crystallogr., B54, 443–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibers, J.A. and Hamilton, W.C., eds. (1974): International Tables for X-ray Crystallography, IV. The Kynoch Press, Birmingham, U.K. Google Scholar
Jameson, G.B. (1982) On structure refinement using data from a twinned crystal. Acta Crystallogr., A38, 817–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S. (1977) Luetheite, Cu2Al2(AsO4)2(OH)2.H2O, a new mineral from Arizona, compared with chenevixite. Mineral. Mag., 41, 2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar