Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 13
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    SHNEIDERMAN, SARA and TILLIN, LOUISE 2015. Restructuring States, Restructuring Ethnicity: Looking Across Disciplinary Boundaries at Federal Futures in India and Nepal. Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 49, Issue. 01, p. 1.

    Donegan, Brendan 2014. A Rogue and Peasant Slave: Adivasi Resistance 1800-2000, by Shashank Kela. New Delhi: Navayana. 2012. Pp. ix+384. Rs 595 (hb). ISBN 978-8-189-05936-1. Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 309.

    Rao, Nitya and Mitra, Amit 2013. Migration, Representations and Social Relations: Experiences of Jharkhand Labour to Western Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 49, Issue. 6, p. 846.

    Sanchez, Andrew 2012. Deadwood and paternalism: rationalizing casual labour in an Indian company town. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 18, Issue. 4, p. 808.

    Shah, Alpa 2007. The Dark Side of Indigeneity?: Indigenous People, Rights and Development in India. History Compass, Vol. 5, Issue. 6, p. 1806.

    Shah, Alpa 2007. ?Keeping the state away?: democracy, politics, and the state in India's Jharkhand. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 129.

    Rao, Nitya 2005. KINSHIP MATTERS: WOMEN's LAND CLAIMS IN THE SANTAL PARGANAS, JHARKHAND. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 11, Issue. 4, p. 725.

    Corbridge, S. and Kumar, S. 2002. Community, corruption, landscape: tales from the tree trade. Political Geography, Vol. 21, Issue. 6, p. 765.

    Damodaran, Vinita 2002. History, landscape, and indigeneity in Chotanagpur, 1850–1980. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 77.

    Parajuli, Pramod 1996. Ecological ethnicity in the making: Developmentalist hegemonies and emergent identities in India. Identities, Vol. 3, Issue. 1-2, p. 14.

    SIVARAMAKRISHNAN, K. 1995. Situating the Subaltern: History and Anthropology in the Subaltern Studies Project. Journal of Historical Sociology, Vol. 8, Issue. 4, p. 395.

    Hocking, Russell 1994. The potential for BJP expansion: Ideology, politics, and regional appeal — the lessons of Jharkhand. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, Vol. 17, Issue. sup001, p. 157.

    Routledge, Paul 1992. Putting politics in its place. Political Geography, Vol. 11, Issue. 6, p. 588.


The Ideology of Tribal Economy and Society: Politics in the Jharkhand, 1950–1980

  • Stuart corbridge (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 28 November 2008

In this paper I want to explore the implications of the rise and fall of Jharkhandi ethnoregionalism from the point of view of tribal policy and tribal politics in Independent India. More especially I want to examine an ideology of tribal economy and society which informs most existing accounts of Jharkhandi politics and which makes the case for a specifically ‘tribal’ policy. The main propositions of this ideology are recounted in Section One of this paper. They are (1) that the concept of a tribe is given and uproblematical; (2) that the tribals of South Bihar are the original inhaitants of the Jharkhand, where they still predominate (see Figure I); and (3) that tribal politics and tribal policies are effective because individual tribes are themselves undifferentiated, united and geographically concentrated. (A corollary of this third proposition is that any decline in Jharkhandi ethnoregionalism since the mid-1960s must be due to factional disputes within the tribal leadership and/or to inter-tribal clashes, perhaps along denominational lines). These three propositions are examined in Sections Two, Three and Four of the paper, where they are measured against the recent historical experience of India's Jharkhand. The implications of any shortcomings in the ideology of tribal economy and society are taken up in the concluding section of the paper where comments are offered, too, on an alternative ‘model’ of tribal policy and politics in the Jharkhand.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S. Corbridge (1987) ‘Perversity and Ethnoregionalism in Tribal India: The Politics of the Jharkhand’, Political Geography Quarterly (forthcoming).

R. Das Gupta , (1976) ‘Factory Labour in Eastern India: Sources of Supply, 1855–1946’, Indian Economic and Social History Review 13, 277329.

M. Hechter and M. Levi (1979) ‘The Comparative Analysis of Ethnoregional Movements’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 2 (4): 260–74.

S. Jones (1978) ‘Tribal Underdevelopment in India’, Development and Change 9: 4170.

S. Sinha (1973) The Internal Colony: A Study in Regional Exploitation (New Delhi: Sindhu).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Modern Asian Studies
  • ISSN: 0026-749X
  • EISSN: 1469-8099
  • URL: /core/journals/modern-asian-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *