No CrossRef data available.
Hobbes in France, Gallican Histories, and Leviathan's Supreme Pastor
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 April 2022
Few of the recent treatments exploring Leviathan's dramatic expansion of ecclesiological considerations have delved into the political circumstances that furnished Hobbes's immediate Parisian surroundings, as he penned the work during the 1640s. This paper examines French ecclesial debates that were triggered by the publication of a polemical collection of texts narrating the “rights and liberties of the Gallican church.” Many of the tracts included had been written during the accession crisis of the late sixteenth century, and advocated a sacralized view of kingship in order to exclude papal jurisdictional claims in France. This paper argues that innovations in Leviathan's sacred history mirror tropes employed by Gallican writers, so that Hobbes can be seen as adopting a parallel strategy in establishing Leviathan's Supreme Pastor. This explication suggests that Hobbes composed Leviathan to appropriate, rather than eliminate, claims associated with “spiritual” power for the civil sovereign, as critical to the exercise of sovereignty.
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
1 Collins, Jeffrey R., The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes (Oxford, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Springborg, Patricia, “Hobbes on Religion,” in Sorell, Tom, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes (Cambridge, 1996), 346–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tuck, Richard, “Hobbes and Locke on Toleration,” in Dietz, Mary, ed., Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory (Lawrence, 1990), 153–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kabala, Boleslaw Z., “The Return of the Intolerant Hobbes,” History of European Ideas 45/6 (2019), 785–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cromartie, Alan, “Hobbes, Calvinism, and Determinism,” in van Apeldoorn, Laurens and Douglass, Robin, eds., Hobbes on Politics and Religion (Oxford, 2018), 95–115Google Scholar; Martinich, Aloysius P., The Two Gods of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics (Cambridge, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Tuck, Richard, “The Civil Religion of Thomas Hobbes,” in Phillipson, Nicholas and Skinner, Quentin, eds., Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain (Cambridge, 1993), 120–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 See Collins, The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes, 146.
3 Hobbes, Thomas, The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, ed. Molesworth, William, vol. 4 (London, 1841), 237Google Scholar. Hobbes writes, “This book … doth not strike so home at the ministers and Catholic party as that [Leviathan] did.” And in the same volume at page 415: “It is true that Mr. Hobbes came home, but it was because he would not trust his safety with the French clergy.”
4 The phrase appeared in the title of the controversial collection: Dupuy, Pierre, Traitez des droits et libertez de l'Eglise Gallicane (Paris, 1639)Google Scholar.
7 Springborg, Patricia, “Thomas Hobbes and Cardinal Bellarmine: Leviathan and ‘The Ghost of the Roman Empire’,” History of Political Thought 16/4 (1995), 503–31Google Scholar; Mortimer, Sarah, “Christianity and Civil Religion in Hobbes's Leviathan,” in Martinich, A. P. and Hoekstra, Kinch, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes (New York, 2016), 501–17Google Scholar; Collins, The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes.
8 Kelley, Donald R., Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship: Language, Law, and History in the French Renaissance (New York, 1970)Google Scholar; Bouwsma, William J., “Gallicanism and the Nature of Christendom,” in Bouwsma, A Useable Past: Essays in European Cultural History (Berkeley, 1990), 308–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Nicholls, Sophie, Political Thought in the French Wars of Religion (Cambridge, 2021)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Parsons, Jotham, The Church in the Republic: Gallicanism and Political Ideology in Renaissance France (Washington, DC, 2004)Google Scholar; Bergin, Joseph, The Politics of Religion in Early Modern France (New Haven, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Salmon, J. H. M., “Catholic Resistance Theory, Ultramontanism, and the Royalist Response, 1580–1620,” in Burns, J. H., ed., The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought 1450–1700 (Cambridge, 1991), 219–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Parsons, The Church in the Republic. On the similarity of French and Anglican ecclesiastical concerns see Salmon, Renaissance and Revolt, 155–88.
12 Bouwsma, “Gallicanism and the Nature of Christendom.”
13 Parsons, The Church in the Republic, 137–84.
15 Responses to controversies such as the Venetian interdict and James I's oath controversy were heavily influenced by these French polemics and likely familiar to Hobbes from his earliest years. See Sommerville, Johann, Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context (London, 1992), 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Salmon, Renaissance and Revolt, esp. “Anglicanism and Gallicanism in the age of the Counter-Reformation.”
16 Malcolm, Noel, “Hobbes and the European Republic of Letters,” in Malcolm, Aspects of Hobbes (Oxford, 2002), 457–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Malcolm, De Dominis, 1560–1624: Venetian, Anglican, Ecumenist, and Relapsed Heretic (London, 1984); Sommerville, Thomas Hobbes; Collins, The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes, 54–7.
18 Collins, The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes, 72–87, 95–101.
21 Gabriel Demante, ‘Histoire de la publication des livres de Pierre du Puy sur les libertés de l’église gallicane,’ Bibliotheque de l’École des chartes (Paris, 1843–4), 587; Louis Ellies du Pin and Digby Cotes, A New Ecclesiastical History of the Seventeenth Century: Containing an Account of the Controversies in Religion; the Lives and Writings of Ecclesiastical Authors, an Abridgment of Their Works, and a Judgment on Their Style and Doctrine (Oxford, 1725), 79.
22 Demante, “Histoire de la publication,” 589; Jervis, William H., A History of the Church of France, from the Concordat of Bologna, A.D. 1516, to the Revolution (London, 1872), 347–53Google Scholar.
23 Demante, “Histoire de la publication,” 589–92.
27 Hobbes, Thomas, “Letter 37,” in The Clarendon Edition of the Works of Thomas Hobbes, vol. 6, The Correspondence, vol. 1, 1622–1659, ed. Malcolm, Noel (Oxford, 1994), 120Google Scholar, emphasis added.
28 Collins, The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes, 80–81.
29 Demante, “Histoire de la publication,” 598; Jervis, A History of the Church of France, 352.
30 Pierre Blet, “Le chancelier Séguier, protecteur des Jésuites, et l'Assemblée du clergé de 1645,” Archivum historicum Societatis Iesu 26 (1957), 177–98.
31 References to De Cive are to Hobbes, Thomas, On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael (New York, 1998), Ch. VI, 81Google Scholar (hereafter cited as DC:chapter:page).
32 Collins, “Thomas Hobbes and the Blackloist Conspiracy of 1649”; Collins, The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes; Tutino, Thomas White and the Blackloists; Tuck, “The Civil Religion of Thomas Hobbes.”
33 Tutino, Thomas White and the Blackloists, 43–63.
34 Leschassier, Jacques, Les oeuvres de M. Jacques Leschassier … (Paris, 1649)Google Scholar; Coquille, Guy, Oeuvres postumes, excellens et curieux de M. Guy Coquille, sieur de Romenay … (Paris, 1650)Google Scholar; Jervis, A History of the Church of France, 351. Du Pin, A New Ecclesiastical History, 76.
36 Thomas Hobbes, The Clarendon Edition of the Works of Thomas Hobbes, vol. 4, Leviathan: The English and Latin Texts, ed. Noel Malcolm (Oxford, 2012), Ch. XLIV, 960.
37 L:XLIV:960, emphasis added.
42 Joseph R. Strayer, “France: The Holy Land, the Chosen People and the Most Christian King,” in Thomas Bisson and John Benton, eds., Medieval Statecraft and Perspectives of History (Princeton, 2015), 321–35.
46 Dupuy, Traitez des droits et libertez, 5–21.
48 Sommerville, Thomas Hobbes, 113.
51 Dupuy, Traitez des droits et libertez, 136–7.
55 L:XLII:774, emphasis added.
57 L:XLII:780, emphasis added.
62 Jeffrey Collins, “Christian Ecclesiology and the Composition of Leviathan: A Newly Discovered Letter to Thomas Hobbes,” Historical Journal 43/1 (2000), 217–31.
63 Pierre de Marca, De Concordia Sacerdotii et Imperii, seu de libertatibus ecclesiæ Gallicanae (Paris, 1641), 631.
65 Guy Coquille, Les oeuvres de M. Guy Coquille, vol. 1 (Bordeaux, 1703), 109.
69 L:XLII:882, emphasis added.
72 Dupuy, Traitez des droits et libertez, 32.
73 Sommerville, Thomas Hobbes, 114.
74 Stefania Tutino, Empire of Souls: Robert Bellarmine and the Christian Commonwealth (Oxford, 2010), 49–80.
76 Denis, Edmond Richer, 27–33.
77 Tutino, Empire of Souls, 66–72.
78 Denis, Edmond Richer, 28; Sarah Mortimer, Reformation, Resistance, and Reason of State (1517–1625) (Oxford, 2021), 202–6.
79 Jonathan Powis, “Gallican Liberties and the Politics of Later Sixteenth-Century France,” Historical Journal 26/3 (1983), 515–30; Sophie Nicholls, “Gallican Liberties and the Catholic League,” History of European Ideas 40/7 (2014), 940–64; Pierre de Belloy, A Catholicke Apologie against the Libels, Declarations, Advices, and Consultations made, Written, and published by those of the League … (London, 1585), 39.
80 Collins, The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes, 83.
82 Patricia Springborg, “Thomas Hobbes and Cardinal Bellarmine: Leviathan and ‘The Ghost of the Roman Empire’,” History of Political Thought 16/4 (1995), 503–31, at 510.
94 L:XLII:870, 906.
96 The claim is ubiquitous, but see Skinner, Quentin, “Hobbes on Representation,” European Journal of Philosophy 13/2 (2005), 155–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bryan Garsten, “Religion and Representation in Hobbes,” in Ian Shapiro, ed., Leviathan or the Matter, Forme & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civill (New Haven, 2010), 519–46.
98 This contention was debated in the reception of Warrender, Howard, The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation (Oxford, 1961)Google Scholar. For refutations see Nagel, Thomas, “Hobbes's Concept of Obligation,” Philosophical Review 68/1 (1959), 68–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gauthier, David, The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes (Oxford, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
99 Allen, J. W., A History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century (London, 1928), 367–94Google Scholar.
103 Andrew Boyd, “Rinuccini and Civil War in Ireland, 1644–49” History Today 41 (1991), 42–48; Richard Cust, Charles I: A Political Life (Harlow; 2005), 373–86, 411–12.
105 Dupuy, Traitez des droits et libertez, 47, emphasis added.
106 Anon., “Observations de Philalethe sur un libelle intitule Optatus Gallus,” in Coquille, Oeuvres postumes, 11–26, at 19.
107 L:XLII:894, 856.
110 Tuck, “The Civil Religion of Thomas Hobbes”; Stauffer, Devin, Hobbes's Kingdom of Light: A Study of the Foundations of Modern Political Philosophy (Chicago, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Okada, Takuya, “Hobbes on the Supernatural from the Elements of Law to Leviathan,” History of European Ideas 45/7 (2019), 917–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
113 L:XL:746; L:XXXVI:670.
114 Powis, “Gallican Liberties”; Bouwsma, “Gallicanism and the Nature of Christendom”; Allen, A History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century.
115 Thomas Pink, “Suarez and Bellarmine on the Church as Coercive Lawgiver,” in Riccardo Saccenti and Cinzia Sulas, eds., Legge e Natura I dibattiti teologici e giuridici fra XV e XVII secolo (Arricia, 2016), 287–332.
116 Parsons, The Church in the Republic; Bouwsma, “Gallicanism and the Nature of Christendom.”
117 Parsons, The Church in the Republic; Bouwsma, “Gallicanism and the Nature of Christendom.”
127 Thomas Hobbes, The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury (London, 1840), vol. 4V, 8.
131 Although Blackloism was often conflated with “Hobbism” in the English reception of Leviathan, White's project of reconciling the “new sciences” with Aristotelianism led him to a more traditional separation of natural or civil and spiritual authority. These considerations and the Gallican leanings of Hobbes's peers are explored in Allison, Anthony F., “An English Gallican: Henry Holden, (1596/7–1662),” Recusant History 22/3 (1995), 319–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tutino, Thomas White and the Blackloists; Collins, “Thomas Hobbes and the Blackloist Conspiracy of 1649”; Collins, The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes.
132 Collins, The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes, 26.
136 L:XII:180; L:XVI:248.
142 Powis, “Gallican Liberties”; Kelley, Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship; Parsons, The Church in the Republic; Allen, A History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century.
144 Golden, Richard M., The Godly Rebellion: Parisian Curés and the Religious Fronde, 1652–1662 (Chapel Hill, 1981)Google Scholar.
145 Hobbes, Thomas, Behemoth: Or, The Long Parliament, ed. Tönnies, Ferdinand (London, 1969), 3–5, 19–20Google Scholar.