Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T19:24:28.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Splitting CO2 to produce syngas and hydrocarbon fuels: PEC and STC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2017

Eva Karatairi
Affiliation:
eva.karatairi@gmail.com
James E. Miller
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, USA (retired)

Abstract

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Though we live in the Anthropocene era, growing awareness of the potentially damaging global consequences of human dominance is prompting efforts to achieve and retain a favorable global concentration and dynamic equilibrium for CO2, wherein production and consumption balance one another. Large-scale production of sustainable hydrocarbon fuels is a crucial piece of this balancing act, and to this end, scientists and engineers are manipulating three widely available ingredients—sunlight, water, and CO2—through electrochemical, photoelectrochemical, and solar thermochemical means. The focus of much of this work is the initial production of syngas, a versatile precursor of synthetic fuels, consisting of CO and H2, which leverages established commercial processes for syngas conversion to hydrocarbon fuels. In the previous issue of EQ, global efforts on the most technologically ready approach of the three, electrolysis, were examined. Herein, we take a closer look at photoelectrochemistry (PEC) and solar thermochemistry (STC) in this context.

PEC, like electrolysis, exploits energetic electrons to provide the energy and to drive the chemical conversions. The difference is the more direct coupling and integration of the electron source, electrode/catalysts, and other components in PEC. For example, since October 2015, the Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis (JCAP, a US DOE Energy Innovation Hub) has conducted the mesoscale design project, which is focused on creating a fully integrated PEC device with improved efficiency for the production of renewable fuels. The device comprises a combined PV and electrolyzer, with a catalyst deposited directly on top of solar photon absorbers. It requires the assembly of photoactive semiconductors, cathodic and anodic catalysts, and an ion-conducting membrane.

David Tiede, member of the Argonne-Northwestern Solar Energy Research Center, explained the approach: “In classical electrolysis, the electrode is agnostic; it doesn’t know where it gets potential from.… PEC involves semiconductors which, when you shine light on them, move electrons up from the valence to the conduction band. These become mobile electrons, with a reducing power generated by light.” The energetic mobile electrons (and/or holes) can move to the surface or interface regions of the device where they are available for reaction. Tiede added that the initial light absorption pushes electrons to highly exited orbitals, yielding the so-called hot carriers. “If captured in less than picoseconds, before they lose their energy in the form of heat and end up in the lowest excited states, then one has very reactive hot electrons,” he said.

The efficiencies reported for PEC vary, but many are impressive. Earlier this year, the team of Michael Graetzel at École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) in Switzerland reported a targeted electrochemical transformation of CO2 to CO and oxygen, using CuO nanowires covered with SnO2, by means of atomic layer deposition. With the additional use of a GaInP/GaInAs/Ge photovoltaic, they achieved the solar-driven splitting of CO2 at an efficiency of 13.4%.

Still many challenges, particularly around materials, remain, as lifetimes of PEC systems tend to be short (measured in hours or days), and the demonstrations are at laboratory scale. “PEC approaches must focus on longevity of the components and design of complete, practical, and scalable demonstration systems,’’ said Sophia Haussener, professor at EPFL, who specializes in both PEC and STC.

Design of catalysts for improved efficiency and selectivity is an area of active interest. Zetian Mi, from McGill University in Montreal, explained why syngas is an attractive target for PEC. ‘‘Compared to the one-step direct reduction of CO2 and H2O to liquid hydrocarbons and methanol by a multi-electron transfer process, it is more feasible to take a two-step process: First reduce CO2 and H2O by a two-electron pathway to syngas intermediate, which will then be converted to liquid hydrocarbons and methanol using well-established standard industrial processes, like Fischer–Tropsch (FT) technology,’’ he said.

Mi, together with Sheng Chu, also from McGill University, and others recently reported syngas production in an aqueous photoelectrochemical cell, with the desirable CO/H2 ratio of 1:2. “We found that Cu and ZnO, a classical combination in industrial CO2 hydrogenation, could work cooperatively and efficiently to achieve a tunable syngas composition that meets the requirements for different downstream products,’’ said Mi. He added that boosting the reduction selectivity into CO was one of the biggest challenges they had to address, because of the domination of the H2 evolution reaction in an aqueous solution.

“Right now, the best catalyst we know is made of Cu,” said Jens Nørskov, professor of chemical engineering and photon science at Stanford University and director of SUNCAT. “In our lab, we are working both on understanding Cu [catalysts], as well as on new designs that will work better,’’ he said. Nørskov wants to skip the extra step and is looking for a way to electrochemically transform CO2 to something more reduced. “We don’t have the catalysts that enable this efficiently. We do have catalysts, based on Cu in particular, that work, and we can make a number of interesting products. What we want is to make these catalysts work with less energy input … and also to be able to control their selectivity. Make only one or a few products rather than a whole soup of them,” he added.

Unlike electrochemistry (EC) and PEC, in STC processes, syngas is thermally produced using concentrating solar power systems—special mirror assemblies that track the sun and concentrate the rays to high intensities. In a typical two-step cyclic STC process, solar-thermal heat reduces a metal oxide in a first step, releasing oxygen, and H2 and/or CO are produced in a second distinct step when the oxide is reoxidized by H2O and/or CO2, respectively.

For both steps to be thermodynamically and kinetically feasible, metal oxides that reduce at very high temperatures tend to be preferred. Oxides containing iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), zirconium (Zr), and cerium (Ce) are the spearheads in this area. While materials development and reactor engineering efforts have decreased reduction temperatures to less than 1500°C, operating temperatures well above 1200°C are still common. Nonetheless, compared to PEC, “STC approaches are more successful in stability (in the range of months) and have been demonstrated at scales of kilowatts to hundreds of kilowatts,” said Haussener.

Mirror assemblies that focus the power of the sun on solar receivers atop power towers at the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System in California’s Mojave Desert. Credit: BrightSource Energy.

The European Commission-supported SOLAR-JET project, led by Aldo Steinfeld and Philipp Furler of ETH Zürich, highlighted the entire production chain for renewable kerosene by solar thermochemical splitting of CO2 and H2O. In this case, nonstoichiometric ceria (CeO2–δ), in the form of a reticulated porous ceramic structure, was used as the reactive oxide in a high-temperature two-step H2O/CO2 thermochemical splitting reactor. The researchers reported conducting 291 consecutive CO2 and CO2/H2O splitting cycles, yielding 700 standard liters of syngas. The collected syngas was subsequently processed via FT and hydrocracking at Shell Global Solutions in Amsterdam, giving liquid hydrocarbons with a composition of 17.1 wt% naphtha, 35.6 wt% kerosene, 17.1 wt% gasoil, and 30.2 wt% of heavier fractions.

Though very high efficiencies are within reach theoretically, demonstrated efficiencies are currently in the range of 5%. Efficiencies are currently limited by both engineering (reactor design) and materials aspects, and the interplay between the two. The materials aspects of the challenge are becoming ever more appreciated. In Haussener’s view, “STC needs to be more focused on materials with better redox behavior” (deeper reduction at lower temperatures and higher oxygen partial pressure, while maintaining oxidation reactivity and rapid kinetics).

Materials work of this type is being pursued around the world, much of it now focused on Ce and redox active perovskites. One of the first successful uses of nonstoichiometric perovskite oxides for STC CO2 (and water) splitting was demonstrated at Sandia National Laboratories. LaAlO3 doped with Mn and Sr efficiently split CO2, producing significantly more fuel than Ce at reduction temperatures well below 1550°C and maintaining constant activity for many cycles. Computational design and discovery techniques now focus on similar materials for STC.

Additionally, many groups are pursuing a variety of hybrid approaches that incorporate aspects of STC with chemical looping that can help advance the field. For example, Fanxing Li at North Carolina State University and his team recently reported work on perovskite-structured oxides Sr2Fe2O5 and Sr3Fe2O6 dispersed in an inert and earth-abundant Ca0.5Mn0.5O phase to yield nanocomposites with excellent stability. The materials were first reduced by methane at 900– 980°C to yield syngas and then reoxidized with CO2 (with almost complete CO2 conversion) to provide additional CO; the overall process was proposed as a route to acetic acid with greatly decreased CO2 emissions.

Predictions are not easy for the when and how of sustainable fuels or, more broadly, chemicals. Nørskov noted, “It is really at the heart of the future in many ways, because we need fuels but we also need chemicals. A lot of the materials today are based on the carbon polymer industry, which is based on fossil input. If we want to change that in the future, we need processes with which we can make these molecules in a sustainable fashion.”

For now, EC, PEC, and STC research complement one another and mitigate risk, each having different challenges to address and different solutions to offer. Electrolysis has already left the lab and seems closer to succeeding in the goal of providing the transportation fleet with sustainable synthetic fuels with no fossil origins. STC has not demonstrated the efficiencies of PEC, but PEC has not demonstrated the robustness of STC. In any case, as Haussener and Mi said, success will also depend on government support and the early involvement of industry. “Policy actions like a carbon tax will ensure a plane playfield for the competition of renewable fuel and fossil fuel approaches,” said Mi. When asked to make a prediction, Tiede said, “We are trying to compete against natural fuels and gas, and it is of course cheaper to take these materials from the ground than to create it from scratch. It depends how much people like and need clean and sustainable versus soon-to be depleted geological sources. It might take long to develop a technology at scale, but we will need it eventually. It will mature, get better, and pretty soon will grow. So, I suspect, this is how it begins.”