Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:30:20.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of the Time-Dependent Physical Processes in the Electromigration of Deep Submicron Copper and Aluminum Interconnects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

G. Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringNanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798
C. M. Tan
Affiliation:
School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringNanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798
Z. H. Gan
Affiliation:
School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringNanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798
K. Prasad
Affiliation:
School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringNanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798
D. H. Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringNanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798
Get access

Abstract

Electromigration (EM) is a major reliability issue in VLSI. Many physical processes are involved simultaneously in an EM process, namely atom migration due to electron wind force, thermal migration due to temperature gradient, stress migration due to stress gradient, and surface migration (just when free surface is available) due to surface tension. In this work, the intrinsic EM damages of Al and Cu, that is without the effect from the surrounding materials, was investigated and compared based on the finite element analysis (FEA). The FEA results show that, in the intrinsic Al EM damage, electron wind force induced flux divergence is always the main cause of void growth; however, in the intrinsic Cu EM damage, dominant flux divergence varies with time, with the final dominant flux divergence due to electron wind force. It is also found that current density and temperature gradient are the most important factors affecting flux divergence. These simulation predictions agree with experimental observation and theoretical analysis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Huntington, H. B., Thin Solid Films 25(2) 265, (1975).Google Scholar
[2] Blech, I. A., Acta Mater. 46(11) 3717, (1998).Google Scholar
[3] Lloyd, J. R., Microelectronics Engineering 49, 51, (1999).Google Scholar
[4] Xia, L., Bower, A. F., Suo, Z. and Shih, C. F., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 45(9) 1473, (1997).Google Scholar
[5] Zhao, J. H., Electromigration & Electronic Device Degradation, edited by Christou, A. (John Wiley & Sons, 1994), p.167.Google Scholar
[6] Blech, I. A. and Herring, C., Applied Physics Letters 29(3) 131, (1976).Google Scholar
[7] Ru, C. Q., Journal of Materials Science 35, 5575, (2000).Google Scholar
[8] Bastawros, A. F. and Kim, K. S., Journal of Electronic Packaging (ASME) 120(4) 354, (1998).Google Scholar
[9] Dalleau, D. and Weide-Zaage, K., Microelectronics Reliability 41, 1625, (2001).Google Scholar
[10] Cahn, R. W. and Hassen, P., Physical Metallurgy (North-Holland Physics Pub., 1983).Google Scholar
[11] Hu, C. K., Lee, K. Y., Gignac, L. and Carruthers, R., Thin Solid Films 308-309, 443, (1997).Google Scholar
[12] TableCurve 2D 5.0, released by SPSS Inc (2000).Google Scholar
[13] Lloyd, J. R., Clemens, J. and Snede, R., Microelectronics Reliability 39, 1595, (1999).Google Scholar