Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:39:03.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design of Sandwich Composites with Multi-Functional Facesheets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

Uday K. Vaidya
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, U.S.A.
Selvum Pillay
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, U.S.A.
Helena Ricks
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, U.S.A.
Shane Bartus
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, U.S.A.
Chad Ulven
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, U.S.A.
Biju Mathew
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Sandwich composites find increasing use as flexural load bearing lightweight sub-elements in air / space vehicles, rail / ground transportation, marine and sporting goods. The core materials in these applications is usually balsa, foam or honeycombs, while laminated carbon or glass are used as facesheets. A limitation of traditional sandwich configurations is that the space in the core becomes inaccessible once the facesheets are bonded in place. Significant multi-functional benefits can be obtained by making either the facesheets or the core, space accessible. Multi-functionality is generally referred to as value added to the structure that enhances functions beyond traditional load bearing. Such functions may include sound / vibration damping, ability to route wires or embed sensors. The present work considers traditional core materials of nomex and aluminum honeycombs that possess functional space accessible facesheets, and their low velocity impact (LVI) response.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Karlsson, K.F and Astrom, B.T., “Manufacturing and Applications of Structural Sandwich Components,” Composites, Part A, pp. 97111 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Zenkert, D., “The Handbook of Sandwich Construction,” Engineering Materials Advisory Services Ltd., (Chameleon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
3. Palazotto, A.N., Gummadi, L.N.B., Vaidya, U.K., and Herup, E., “Low Velocity Impact Damage Characteristics of Z-Fiber Reinforced Sandwich Panels-An Experimental Study,” Composite Structures, Volume: 43, Issue: 4, Feb, pp. 275288 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Wu, C.L., Weeks, C.A., and Sun, C.T., “ Improving Honeycomb-Core Sandwich Structures for Impact Resistance,” Journal of Advanced Materials, pp. 4147 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Vaidya, U.K., Hosur, M.V., Earl, D., and Jeelani, S., “Impact Response of Integrated Hollow Core Sandwich Composite Panels,” Composites Part-A, 31 pp. 761772 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Wu, C.L. and Sun, C.T., “Low Velocity Impact Damage in Composite Sandwich Beams,” Composite Structures, 24, pp. 2127 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Abrate, S., “Impact on Laminated Composite Materials,” Applied Mechanics Review, Vol. 44, No.4, April, pp.155190 (1991)..Google Scholar
8. Herup, E., “Low Velocity Impact on Composite Sandwich Plates,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Air Force Institute of Technology, AFIT/DS/ENY/96-11, Dayton OH, July (1996).Google Scholar