Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-4hfp6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-12T09:54:30.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Interface Roughness on Ellipsometric Measurements of Thin Oxides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Scott T. Dunham  and
Bhawana Agrawal
Scott T. Dunham
Affiliation:
Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Department., Boston University, Boston, MA 02215
Bhawana Agrawal
Affiliation:
Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Department., Boston University, Boston, MA 02215
Get access

Abstract

Measurements of film thickness using ellipsometry assume all interfaces to be ideally planar. This approximation works well for films much thicker than the roughness of the interfaces. For very thin films. the interface roughness can cause significant errors in thickness measurements. In this paper, we calculate the effect of interface roughness on oxide thickness measurements and use those calculations to account for some of the observed differences between film thickness measurements of thin oxides (< 200 A) as measured by ellipsometry and transmission electron microscopy.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 105: Symposium F – SiO2 and Its Interfaces , 1987 , 301
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]: Massoud, H. Z., Plummer, J. D. and Irene, E. A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 132, 2693 (1985).Google Scholar
[2] Carim, A. H. and Sinclair, R., J. Electrochem. Soc., 134, 741 (1987).Google Scholar
[3] Ravindra, N. M. and Narayan, J., Fathy, Darish, Srivastava, J. K. and Irene, E. A., J. Mater. Res.. 2. 216 (1987).Google Scholar
[4] Ravindra, N. M., Russo, O. L., Fathy, D., Narayan, J., Hyde, A. R.. and Vedam, K. in SiO2 and its Interfaces, edited by Lucovsky, G. and Pantelides, S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 105, Pittsburgh, PA 1987) pp.Google Scholar
[5] Blanc, J., Buiocchi, C. J., Abrahams, M. S. and Ham, W. E., Appl. Phys. Let., 30, 120 (1977).Google Scholar
[6] Garnett, J. C. Maxwell, Phil. Trans., 203. 385 (1904); 205, 237 (1906).Google Scholar
[7] Taft, E. and Cordes, L., J. Electrochem. Soc., 126, 131 (1979).Google Scholar
[8] Aspnes, D. E. and Theeten, J. B., J. Electrochem. Soc., 127,1359 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Johannessen, J. S. and Spicer, W. E., Strausser, Y. E., J. Appl. Phys., 47, 3028 (1976).Google Scholar
[10] Hecht, M. in SiO2 and its Interfaces, edited by Lucovsky, G. and Pantelides, S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 105, Pittsburgh, PA 1987) pp.Google Scholar
[11] Hahn, P. O., Lampert, I. and Schnegg, A. in SiO2 and its Interfaces, edited by Lucovsky, G. and Pantelides, S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 105, Pittsburgh, PA 1987) pp.Google Scholar