Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:21:15.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Nanocrystallinity on Properties of Photodiode and TFT Image Sensor Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. Kolodziej
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, University of Mining and Metallurgy, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30–059 Krakow, Poland, kolodzie@uci.agh.edu.pl
S. Nowak
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, University of Mining and Metallurgy, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30–059 Krakow, Poland, kolodzie@uci.agh.edu.pl
P. Krewniak
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, University of Mining and Metallurgy, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30–059 Krakow, Poland, kolodzie@uci.agh.edu.pl
Get access

Abstract

This paper reports technological experiments which have strongly affected the properties of the multilayer image sensor structure. The high deposition rate and large hydrogen content during the reactive magnetron deposition process causes nanocrystallization of prepared silicon films. We also report experiments with laser crystallization. The effect of microstructure in a-Si:H films on TFT and pin diode characteristics has been investigated. Crystallinity was confirmed by Raman scattering, small angle X-ray diffraction (SAXD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The parameters of the photodiodes such as quantum efficiency, dark and light currents, etc. have been tested using the measurements of samples in the configuration of a linear image sensor consisting of two rows, 30 to 160 pixels per row, with dimensions 0.1mm2-1mm2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Fujieda, I., Nelson, S., Nylen, P., Street, R.A., Weisfield, R.L., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 137&138, 1321 (1991).Google Scholar
2.Powell, M.J., French, I.D., Hughes, J.R., Bird, N.C., Davies, O.S., Glasse, C., Curran, J.E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 258, 1127 (1992).Google Scholar
3.Kolodziej, A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 185, 168 (1995).Google Scholar
4.Kolodziej, A., Nowak, S., Krewniak, P., in Proceedings of the 19-th Conference of ISHM Poland (International Society for Hybrid Microelectronics Poland Chapter, Wroclaw, 1996), p. 113.Google Scholar
5.Kanicki, J., in Amorphous and Microcrystalline Semiconductor Devices: Optoelectronic devices (Artech House, Boston, 1991).Google Scholar
6.Hack, M., Mei, P., Lujan, R., Lewis, A.G., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 164–166, 727 (1993).Google Scholar
7.Johnson, R.I., Anderson, G.B., Boyce, J.B., Fork, D.K., Mei, P., Ready, S.E., Chen, S. in Amorphous Silicon Technology (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 297, 1993) pp. 533538.Google Scholar
8.Gregora, I., Champagnon, B., Saviot, L., Monin, Y., Thin Solid Films 255, 139 (1995).Google Scholar
9.Biegelsen, D.K., Jackson, W.B., Lujan, R., Jared, D., Weisfield, R. in Amorphous Silicon Technology (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 377, 1995) pp. 833838.Google Scholar