Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:10:57.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring the Adhesion of Diamond Thin Films to Substrates Using the Blister Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Jim Sizemore
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305
R. J. Hohlfelder
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305
J. J. Vlassak
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305
W. D. Nix
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305
Get access

Abstract

It is shown that the blister testing technique can be used to measure the adhesion of thin films to their substrates. A brief discussion of blister test mechanics is presented here, leading to a simple equation relating adhesion to the height of the blister and the pressure causing it to grow. Blister test data for plasma-enhanced CVD diamond films on Si substrates have been analyzed using this relation. The tests show adhesion energies of 1.8– 2.6 J/m2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1) Bachmann, P.K. and Messier, R., Chem. and Eng. News, 67 (20) 2439 1989)Google Scholar
2) Beams, J. W., Structure and properties of thin films, Neugebauer, C. A., Newkirk, J. B., and Vermilyea, D. A., Eds., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1959.Google Scholar
3) Vlassak, J. J., Nix, W. D., J. Materials Research, 7, 32423249 (1992).Google Scholar
4) Paviot, V. M., Vlassak, J. J., Nix, W. D., Measuring the mechanical properties of thin metal films by bulge testing of micromachined windows, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 356 1995.Google Scholar
5) Dannenberg, H., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 5, 125 (1961).Google Scholar
6) Gent, A. N., Lewandowski, L. H., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 33, 15671577 (1987).Google Scholar
7) Jeong, H.S., Chu, Y. Z., Duming, C. J., White, R. C., Surface and Interface Analysis, 18 289292 (1992).Google Scholar
8) Sizemore, J., Stevenson, D. A., Stringer, J., Modeling of the blister test to express adhesive strength in terms of measurable quantities, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 308, 165170 1993.Google Scholar
9) Small, M. K., Nix, W. D., J. Materials Research, 7, 15531563 (1992).Google Scholar
10) Vlassak, J. J., Ph. D. Dissertation, Stanford University, 1994.Google Scholar
11) Small, M. K., Ph. D. Dissertation, Stanford University, 1992.Google Scholar
12) Suo, Z, Hutchinson, J. W., Int. J. Fract., 43, 1 (1990).Google Scholar
13) Hohlfelder, R. J., Vlassak, J. J., Nix, W. D., Luo, H, Chidsey, C. E. D., Blister Test Analysis Methods, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 356, 1995.Google Scholar
14) Courtney, T. H., Mechanical Behavior of Materials, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990.Google Scholar