Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:38:30.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical Stress as a Function of Temperature in Thin Aluminum Films and its Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Donald S. Gardner
Affiliation:
C.I.S., Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. 94305
Paul A. Flinn
Affiliation:
Intel Corporation and Dept. of M.S. & E., Stanford University, Stanford, Ca 94305
Get access

Abstract

Aluminum alloys have virtually replaced aluminum for interconnections in VLSI because of their improved reliability. Mechanical stress is a problem of growing importance in these interconnections. Stress as a function of temperature was measured for thin aluminum films and several aluminum alloys and layered films consisting of silicon, copper, titanium, tungsten, tantalum, vanadium, and TiSi2. Solid-state reactions of the aluminum with the additives and with the ambient during thermal cycling will occur and depending on what compounds have formed and at what temperature, this will determine the morphology and reliability of the metallization. The measurement technique, based on determination of wafer curvature with a laser scanning device, directly measures the total film stress and reflectivity in situ during thermal cycling. Changes in stress were detected when film composition and structure varied and were correlated using x-ray diffraction with the formation of aluminides. Other phenomena that contribute to stress changes including elastic behavior, recrystallization, grain growth, plastic behavior, yield strength, and film hardening from precipitates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Gardner, D. S.. Layered and Homogeneous Aluminum Alloys for Interconnection Devices in Integrated Circuits. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1988. Available through U.M.I., 300 Road, N. Zeeb, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, Order No. 88–15, 003.Google Scholar
[2] Gardner, D. S. and Flinn, P. A.. Trans. Electron Devices, 35(12), pp. 21602169, 1988.10.1109/16.8790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Gardner, D. S. and Flinn, P. A.. J. Appl. Phys., 1989. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
[4] Flinn, P. A., Gardner, D. S., and Nix, W. D.. IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices, ED–34(3), pp. 689699, 1987.10.1109/T-ED.1987.22981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Gardner, D. S., Michalka, T. L., Flinn, P. A., Barbee, T. W. Jr., Saraswat, K. C., and Meindl, J. D.. In 1985 Proc. Second Intl. IEEE VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conf., pp. 102–113, 1985.Google Scholar
[6] Hoffman, R. W.. In Physics of Thin Films, pp. 211273, 1966.Google Scholar
[7] Campbell, D. S.. In Basic Problems in Thin Film Physics, pp. 223–230, 1966.Google Scholar
[8] Campbell, D. S.. Handbook of Thin Film Technology, p. 12.3. Mc-Graw Hill Book Co., New York, 1970.Google Scholar
[9] Kinosita, K.. In Proc. of the Second Colloquium on Thin Films, Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, Gottingen, pp. 31–37, 1967.Google Scholar
[10] Hoffman, R. W.. Physics of Nonmetallic Thin Films, pp. 273353. Volume 14 of B, NATO Advanced Study Institute, Plenum Press, New York, 1976.10.1007/978-1-4684-0847-8_12Google Scholar
[11] Gardner, D. S., Michalka, T. L., Saraswat, K. C., Barbee, T. W. Jr., McVittie, J. P., and Meindl, J. D.. Trans. on Electron Devices, ED-32(2), 1985.10.1109/T-ED.1985.21927Google Scholar
[12] Gardner, D. S. and Saraswat, K.. In Multilayers: Synthesis, Properties, and Nonelectronic Applications, Materials Res. Soc., 1987.Google Scholar
[13] Sinha, A. K., Levenstein, H. J., and Smith, T. E.. J. Appl. Phys., 49, pp. 24232426, 1978.10.1063/1.325084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] McInerney, E. J. and Flinn, P. A.. In 20th Annual Proc. Intl. Reliability Physics Symp., IEEE, pp. 264–267, 1982.Google Scholar
[15] Flinn, P. A. and Waychunas, G. A.. J. Vac. Sci Technol., B 6(6), 1988.10.1116/1.584172Google Scholar
[16] Nakamura, K., Lau, S. S., Nicolet, M., and Mayer, J. W.. Appl. Phys. Lett., 28(5), pp. 277280, 1976.10.1063/1.88734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Eizenberg, M., Thompson, R. D., and Tu, K. N.. J. Appl. Phys., 53(10), pp. 68916897, 1982.10.1063/1.330030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Finstad, T. G., Salomonsen, G., Norman, N., and Johannessen, J. S.. Thin Solid Films, 114, pp. 271284, 1984.10.1016/0040-6090(84)90124-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Dirks, A. G. and van den Broek, J. J.. Scripta Metallurgica, 21(2), pp. 175180, 1987.10.1016/0036-9748(87)90430-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Colgan, E. G., Palmstrom, C. J., and Mayer, J. W.. J. Appl. Phys., 58(5), pp. 18381840, 1985.10.1063/1.336036Google Scholar