Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:28:00.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Dynamics Studies of Thin-Films of Sn On Cu

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. Ravelo ,
J. Aguilar  and
M. I. Baskes
R. Ravelo
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Materials Research Institute, University of Texas, El Paso, TX, 79968
J. Aguilar
Affiliation:
Materials Research Institute, University of Texas, El Paso, TX 79968
M. I. Baskes
Affiliation:
Materials Reliability Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, 94551
Get access

Abstract

Using Molecular Dynamics, the evolution dynamics of Sn on the (111) and (100) surfaces of Cu have been investigated as a function of coverage and temperature. The interaction potentials are described by modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potentials. The calculated diffusion activation energies of Cu in Sn and Sn in Cu agree reasonably well with experimental values. We find that the structure of the overlayer depends on the morphology of the substrate and remains stable up to temperatures of the order of 70% of the melting temperature of the substrate at which diffusion of Sn into the substrate and Cu atoms onto the overlayer is observed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 492: Symposium S – Microscopic Simulation of Interfacial Phenomena in Solids… , 1997 , 43
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Campbell, C.T., Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41, p. 775(1990).Google Scholar
[2] Overbury, S. H. and Ku, Yi-sha, Phys. Rev. B 46, p. 7868 (1992).Google Scholar
[3] Dyson, B.F., Anthony, T.R. and Turnbull, D., J. Appl. Phys. 38, p. 3408 (1967).Google Scholar
[4] Abel, F., Cohen, C., Davies, J.A., Moulin, J. and Schmaus, D., Appl. Surf. Sci. 44, pp. 17–27 (1990).Google Scholar
[5] Argile, G. and Rhead, G.E., Surf. Sci. 135, p. 18 (1983).Google Scholar
[6] Baskes, M.I., Phys. Rev. B 46, p. 2727 (1992) and references therein.Google Scholar
[7] Baskes, M.I. and Johnson, R.A., Modeling Simul. Mater. Sei. Eng. 2, p. 147 (1994).Google Scholar
[8] Ravelo, R. and Baskes, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, p. 2482 (1997).Google Scholar
[9] Morris, J.R., Wang, C.Z., Ho, K.M. and Chan, C.T., Phys. Rev. B 49, p. 3109 (1994) and references therein.Google Scholar
[10] Ravelo, R. and Baskes, M. in Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Phase Transformations, edited by Im, I.S., Greer, A.L., Park, B. and Stephenson, G.B. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 398, Pittsburgh, PA 1996), p. 287.Google Scholar
[11] Baskes, M.I., Angelo, J.E. and Bisson, C.L., Modeling Simul. Mater. Sei. Eng. 2, 505 (1994).Google Scholar
[12] Balluffi, R.W. J. Nucl. Mater. 69/70, p. 240 (1978).Google Scholar
[13] Shah, N. and Catz, A.L., Phys. Rev. B 30, p. 2498 (1984).Google Scholar
[14] Mcllwain, J. et al., Radiation Effects 24, p. 19 (1975).Google Scholar
[15] Le Claire, A.D., J. Nucl. Mater. 69/70, p. 70 (1978).Google Scholar
[16] Le Claire, A.D., Phil. Mag. 7, p 141 (1962).Google Scholar
[17] Anthony, T.R. and Turnbull, D., Phys. Rev. 151, p 459 (1966).Google Scholar