Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:55:44.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Mechanics of Organic Composite Materials: A Case Study of Cellulose-Adhesive System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2014

Lik-ho Tam  and
Denvid Lau
Lik-ho Tam
Affiliation:
Ph.D. Student, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Denvid Lau
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Get access

Abstract

Organic composite materials can be readily found in our daily life, such as plywood used in construction industry and bamboo composites as indoor and outdoor flooring materials. These organic composite material systems consist of cellulose fibers bonded with each other through adhesives, leading to a bonded system with a gradient structure that possesses a unique structural behavior which has a great potential to be used as load-bearing building materials. In view of the manufacturing process of such composite material systems and the structure in-between the cellulose fibers and the adhesives, the interfacial adhesion of such systems at multiscale would play a major role in determining their capability in load-bearing structural applications. In this research work, the interface between cellulose fiber and phenol-formaldehyde adhesive is chosen as a representative of the organic composite material system and molecular dynamics simulation is used for quantifying their mechanical properties and the corresponding interfacial adhesion. Here we demonstrate that cellulose fiber has a strong affinity to a phenol-formaldehyde adhesive with an adhesion energy of 151.3 mJ/m2. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that reports this material property for cellulose-adhesive system, which is three times larger than that between the gecko foot’s hair and the mineral surface. The mechanism of such strong adhesion is due to the possible hydrogen bonding between the cellulose and the adhesive.

Keywords

adhesiveorganicadhesion
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1662: Symposium VV – Designed Cellular Materials—Synthesis, Modeling, Analysis and Applications , 2014 , mrsf13-1662-vv05-02
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Mohanty, A., Misra, M. and Drzal, L., Journal of Polymers and the Environment 10 (1-2), 19–26 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, T. C. and Skaf, M. S., Journal of computational chemistry 33(14), 1338–1346 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishiyama, Y., Langan, P. and Chanzy, H., Journal of the American Chemical Society 124(31), 9074–9082 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(Accelrys Software Inc.: Materials Studio).Google Scholar
Lau, D., Bueyuekoztuerk, O. and Buehler, M. J., Journal of Materials Research 27(14), 1787–1796 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauber‐Osguthorpe, P., Roberts, V. A., Osguthorpe, D. J., Wolff, J., Genest, M. and Hagler, A. T., Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 4(1), 31–47 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagler, A., Huler, E. and Lifson, S., Journal of the American Chemical Society 96(17), 5319–5327 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifson, S., Hagler, A. and Dauber, P., Journal of the American Chemical Society 101(18), 5111–5121 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maple, J. R., Dinur, U. and Hagler, A. T., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 85(15), 5350–5354 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagler, A. and Lifson, S., Journal of the American Chemical Society 96(17), 5327–5335 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büyüköztürk, O., Buehler, M. J., Lau, D. and Tuakta, C., International Journal of Solids and Structures 48(14), 2131–2140 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plimpton, S., Journal of Computational Physics 117(1), 1–19 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S. and Qu, J., Polymer (2012).Google ScholarPubMed
Shenogina, N. B., Tsige, M., Patnaik, S. S. and Mukhopadhyay, S. M., Polymer 54(13), 3370–3376 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laio, A. and Gervasio, F. L., Reports on Progress in Physics 71(12), 126601 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonomi, M., Branduardi, D., Bussi, G., Camilloni, C., Provasi, D., Raiteri, P., Donadio, D., Marinelli, F., Pietrucci, F., Broglia, R. A. and Parrinello, M., Computer Physics Communications 180(10), 1961–1972 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishino, T., Takano, K. and Nakamae, K., Journal of Polymer Science Part B-Polymer Physics 33(11), 1647–1651 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoeckel, F., Konnerth, J. and Gindl-Altmutter, W., International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives (2013).Google Scholar
Israelachvili, J. N., Intermolecular and surface forces: revised third edition. (Academic press, 2011).Google Scholar