Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:28:32.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanostructured indium tin oxide for application in optoelectronic devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

S. P. Fernando
Affiliation:
sumudu@ualberta.ca, University of Alberta, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 114 St - 89 Ave, Edmonton AB, T6G2E1, Canada
K. D. Harris
Affiliation:
Ken.Harris@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, NRC National Institute for Nanotechnology, Edmonton AB, T6G2M9, Canada
N. J. Gerein
Affiliation:
ngerein@ualberta.ca, University of Alberta, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 114 St - 89 Ave, Edmonton AB, T6G2E1, Canada
M. J. Brett
Affiliation:
brett@ece.ualberta.ca, University of Alberta, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 114 St - 89 Ave, Edmonton AB, T6G2E1, Canada
Get access

Abstract

The electrical resistivities of nanostructured films of indium tin oxide were measured. The films were prepared using glancing angle deposition, a physical vapour deposition technique. This technique was used to prepare nanostructured indium tin oxide thin films of various morphologies. Films consisting of vertical posts were electrically characterized using a probing station. Compared to a normally evaporated planar film, the nanostructured films were found to exhibit resistivities approximately two orders of magnitude greater. Development of the measurement technique is ongoing, and several ideas for improvement are described.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ginley, D.S. and Bright, C., MRS Bulletin 25, Vol. 8, 1518 (2000).Google Scholar
2. So, S.K., Choi, W.K., Cheng, C.H., Leung, L.M., and Kwong, C.F., Appl. Phys. A 68, 447450 (1999).Google Scholar
3. Kim, H., Gilmore, C.M., Pique, A., Horwitz, J.S., Mattoussi, H., Murata, H., Kafafi, Z.H., and Chrisey, D.B., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 6451 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Robbie, K., Brett, M.J., and Lakhtakia, A., Nature 384, 616 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Robbie, K. and Brett, M.J., U.S. Patent No. 5 866 204 (Feb. 2, 1999).Google Scholar
6. Jensen, M.O. and Brett, M.J., Appl. Phys. A 80, 763768 (2005).Google Scholar
7. Malac, M., Egerton, R.F., Brett, M.J., and Dick, B., J. Vac. Sci. Technol B 17, 26712674 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Morgan, D.V., Aliyu, Y.H., Bruce, R.W., and Salehi, A., Thin Solid Films 312, 268272 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Nadaud, N., Lequeux, N., Nanot, M., Jové, J., and Roisnel, T., J. Solid State Chem. 135, 140148 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Robbie, K. and Brett, M.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15, 14601465 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Erts, D., Polyakov, B., Daly, B., Morris, M.A., Ellingboe, S., Boland, J., and Holmes, J.D., J. Phys. Chem. 110, 820826 (2006).Google Scholar