Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:06:17.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Nucleation and Epitaxial Growth of Au and Ag on Thin Silicon Studied With a Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Peirong Xu
Affiliation:
School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Peter Miller
Affiliation:
School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
John Silcox
Affiliation:
School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

An UHV Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope (STEM) has been used to study the nucleation and epitaxial growth of Au and Ag deposited at room temperature on H-passivated thin silicon (111) and (100) substrates. Direct observations of the initial stages of overlayer growth were made using bright field (BF) and annular dark field (ADF) imaging modes. Gold was found to grow on silicon in a quasi-continuous layer mode, while 3D island growth with density as high as 4×1012/cm2 was observed in Ag/Si systems. Electron diffraction studies reveal a good epitaxial relationship for Ag films grown both on silicon (111) and (100) substrates. Diffraction also indicates that Au (111) grows on the silicon (111) surface but the grains may be azimuthally rotated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Le Lay, G., Surf. Sci., 122 (1983), 169.Google Scholar
[2] Venables, J. A., Derrien, J. and Janssen, A. P., Surf. Sci., 25 (1980), 411.Google Scholar
[3] Le Lay, G., Quentel, G., Faurie, J. P. and Masson, A., Thin Solid Films, 25 (1976), 289.Google Scholar
[4] Grunthaner, F. J. and Grunthaner, P. J., Mater. Sci. Rep., 1 (1986), 65.Google Scholar
[5] Fork, D. K., Connell, G. A. N., Fenner, D. B., Boyce, J. B., Phillips, J. M. and Geballe, T. H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 52 (1990), 1137.Google Scholar
[6] Xu, P., Kirkland, E. J., Silcox, J. and Keyse, R., Ultramicroscopy, 22 (1990), 93.Google Scholar
[7] Kirkland, E. J., Ultramicroscopy, 32 (1990), 349.Google Scholar
[8] Lee, K. C., Silcox, J. and Lee, C. A., J. Appl. Phys., 54 (1983), 4035.Google Scholar
[9] Ishizaka, A. and Shiraki, Y., J. Electrochem., 133 (1986), 666.Google Scholar
[10] Fenner, D. B., Biegelsen, D. K. and Bringans, R. D., J. Appl. Phys., 66 (1989), 419.Google Scholar
[11] Tosch, St. and Neddermeyer, H., J. Micros., 152 (1988), 415.Google Scholar
[12] Van Loenen, E. J., Iwami, M., Tromp, R.M. and Van der Veen, J. F., Surf. Sci., 137 (1984), 1.Google Scholar
[13] Le Lay, G., Quentel, G., Faurie, J. P. and Masson, A., Thin Solid Films, 35 (1976), 273.Google Scholar
[14] LeGoues, F. K., Krakow, W. and Ho, P. S., Phil. Mag., 53 (1986), 833.Google Scholar
[15] Hiraki, A., Surf. Sci. Rep., 3 (1984), 357.Google Scholar