Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:11:03.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optical Energy Transfer and Photochromism in Doped Sol-Gel Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Drew L'Espérance
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside CA 92521
John M. Pelo
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside CA 92521
Eric L. Chronister
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside CA 92521
Get access

Abstract

Organically doped sol-gel glasses are investigated by optical absorption and time-resolved fluorescence depolarization measurements. Silicate and aluminosilicate glasses have been doped with quinizarin (Q) and aluminum phthalocyanine chloride (CAP). The structure and bonding in these inorganic sol-gel solids is different from that in frozen liquids and organic polymers, and the unique dynamics of these systems are a motivation for this study. Both rotational dynamics and optical energy transfer of doped chromophores in sol-gel glasses are investigated by time-resolved fluorescence depolarization measurements. Since the dipole-dipole energy transfer rate is very sensitive to transfer distance, these measurements are used to probe the spatial distribution of dopant molecules within these solids. We also present photochromic results on aluminum phthalocyanine chloride doped silicate sol-gel glasses and discuss possible uses as an optical power limiting material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dislich, H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 57 371 (1983)Google Scholar
2. Hench, L., West, J., Zhu, B., and Ochoa, R., Sol-Gel Optics. edited by MacKenzie, J D and Ulrich, D. (Proc. SPIE 1328 1990) p 230 Google Scholar
3. Soileau, M. J., editor Materials for Optical Switches. Isolators and Limiters; (Proc SPIE.1105,42, 1989)Google Scholar
4. McKiernan, J., Pouxviel, J-C., Dunn, B., and Zink, J., J. Phys. Chem. 93. 21292133 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Hinsch, A. and Zastrow, A., Optical Materials Technology for Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy Conversion IX 208–217 (Proc. SPIE 1272. 1990)Google Scholar
6. Allen, N., Hayes, G., Riley, P. and Richards, A., J. Photochem. 3, 365373 (1987)Google Scholar
7. Basché, Th. and Bräuchle, C. J.Phys.Chem. 95, 71307131 (1991)Google Scholar
8. Lakowicz, J. R., Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. (Plenum, New York 1983)Google Scholar
9. Förster, Th., Z. Naturforschung A4 321 (1949)Google Scholar
10. Stein, A. D., Peterson, K. A., and Fayer, M. D., J. Chem. Phys. 92 5622 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Baumanm, J. and Fayer, M. D., J. Chem. Phys. 85. 40874107 (1986)Google Scholar
12. L'Espérance, D. and Chronister, E. L., Photopolymer Device Physics. Chemistry and Applications II (Proc. SPIE 1559 1991) pp. 56–64Google Scholar
13. L'Espérance, D. and Chronister, E. L., J Optical Society of America B, in pressGoogle Scholar
14. Perry, J. W., Khundkar, L. R., Coulter, D. R., Alvarez, D. Jr., Marder, S. R., Wei, T. H., Sence, M. J., Van Stryland, E. W., and Hagan, D. J., Organic Materials for Nonlinear Optics and Photonics, Messier, J. et al, editors, (NATO ASI Series E, 194 1991) pp. 369382.Google Scholar
15. Carmicheal, I., Hug, G. L., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 15, 1, (1986)Google Scholar