Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:22:33.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Planarization of Cu and Ta Using Silica and Alumina Abrasives - A Comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

Y. Li
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699 Center for Advanced Materials ProcessingClarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699
S. Ramarajan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699 Center for Advanced Materials ProcessingClarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699
M. Hariharaputhiran
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699 Center for Advanced Materials ProcessingClarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699
Y. S. Her
Affiliation:
Ferro Corporation, Penn Yan, NY
S.V. Babu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699 Center for Advanced Materials ProcessingClarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699
Get access

Abstract

Experimental results on chemical mechanical polishing of copper and tantalum in the presence of different chemicals, such as Fe(NO3)3, H2O2 and glycine, using both silica and alumina abrasive particles are presented. The polish rates with alumina slurries vary in accordance with the hardness of the material being polished, suggesting a dominant role for a wear mechanism. However, polish rates with silica slurries do not relate directly to the hardness of the film, indicating a more complex removal mechanism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Steigerwald, J.M., Murarka, S.P., Gutmann, R. J., Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Microelectronic Materials, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1997).10.1002/9783527617746Google Scholar
2. Hariharaputhiran, M., Li, Y., Ramarajan, S. and Babu, S. V., Chemical-Mechanical Polishing of Ta, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 3 (2), (2000) pp.9598.Google Scholar
3. Ivan'ko, A. A., Handbook of Hardness Data, Israel Program for Sicience Translations, (1971).Google Scholar
4. Luo, Q., Campbell, D. R., and Babu, S. V., Stabilization of Alumina Slurry for Chemical-Mechanical Polishing of Copper, Langmuir, 12(15), (1996) pp. 3563.10.1021/la960062wGoogle Scholar
5. Ramarajan, S., Hariharaputhiran, M., Her, Y.-S. and Babu, S. V., Hardness of Sub-Micrometer Abrasive Particles and Polish Rate Measurements, Surf. Engg., 15 (4), (1999) pp.324328. 10.1179/026708499101516696Google Scholar
6. Cook, M. L., Chemical Processes in Glass Polishing, J. Non-Crystalline Solids, 120, (1990) pp.152171.10.1016/0022-3093(90)90200-6Google Scholar
7. Li, Y., Hariharaputhiran, M. and Babu, S. V., Chemical-Mechanical Polishing of Copper and Tantalum with Silica Abrasives, submitted to J. Mater. Res., May 2000.10.1557/JMR.2001.0148Google Scholar
8. Iler, R. K., The Colloid Chemistry of Silica and Silicates, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, (1955).10.1097/00010694-195507000-00014Google Scholar
9. Hariharaputhiran, M., Zhang, J., Li, Y. and Babu, S.V., MRS Proceedings, vol. 566, (1999) pp.129 10.1557/PROC-566-129Google Scholar
10. Ramarajan, S., Li, Y., Hariharaputhiran, M., Her, Y.-S and Babu, S. V., Effect of pH and Ionic Strength on The Chemical-Mechanical Polishing of Tantalum, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 3(5), (2000) pp.232235.10.1149/1.1391010Google Scholar